Explanation Of David Powell?

Fellow R.A.S.er's (yes, that includes you too, David)............... I'm sorry for copying and reposting this in a new string. I know that's a "no no" in newsgroup etiquette......but this was deeply buried in a silly string below that I started....for fun. I believe this message plainly explains why David Powell is so often "un-readable" and rarely seems to make sense (or humor)......and this post deserves a higher spotlight than it would have received buried in a string of a completely different topic. This is professed to be written by a close friend and long-term schoolmate of Mr. Powell's.......addressed to all the rest of us on r.a.s. I'll not make any further comment, you can form your own opinions as easily as I. So......may I introduce to you.............the REAL David Powell: TP ************************************************************************ Written by: "Gareth" r.a.s. post/string "Re: LFS - Are You Guys Easily Entertained or What?" on 8/21/02 at 8:02 am ************************************************************************ "laughs out loud" at this mess! you guys have been completely suckered! May I introduce myself as a close real life friend of David's for the last 10years in real life. I was glad to receive mail pointing me in the direction of some tea break reading, I love a laugh. Well blow me down! "David, said check out how many petty "muppets" there on this group and mainly how easy you are to wind up" David, your ability to wind up wankers is very strong, and always has been. I have been evilly annoyed at your ability to wind me up at times and do so with such a calm and relaxed look in your eye, but that's why I like you amongst a wealth of other reasons. I may add to Mr.Ymenard, that me old mucker Powell is completely sane, and is doing what he does best, winding up the wanker. He has a ability in this field I've yet to see surpassed, and being closely involved with Courts of Law and the Police this is quite an achievement. It's more about the way he winds people up, he turns "reasonable", "normal" people into dribbling heaps of self embarrassment. He has a canny ability to carry this off, I may add, he only picks people he doesn't like or generally those others don't. I think to him its a game, he's secure enough in his own mind to make a tit of himself while dragging others to new found levels of desperation. To me this old news I've seen it many times, I can tell you for sure, you have been had up. Mr Powell will be sat in his desk probably smoking another joint rubbing his hands with glee at how easy you lot are to manipulate. What's really funny is, these guys think your serious "laughs out loudly"....I mean, when it comes to driving debate you will be serious, intensely so, I've seen James and yourself at logger heads enough times to know that, but anything else "laughs out loudly"...You've got that Ynemard fella feeding from your hand like a baby.... Ymenard must be completely mad, funny thing is David acts mad, but he's totally sane (well a very developed and free mind and that is often used/seems to bring out the worst in people) just has a good grasp of psychology, mostly uses this to wind people into a spin where they haven't got an clue which direction to go to get out. This being a classic example... Ynemard will no doubt try and weasel out of this with a load of reversed arguments, but that's just my BA Psychology talking. Guys don't mess with him, he will ruin you, and all the time he's smoking joints and "laughing out loudly" You shouldn't waste so much time here David, we miss you, that bloody game has consumed you! Good to see you can still "wind the wanker" - "laughs out loudly" I'm amazed at your resilience, as everyone here hates you! "laughs out loudly" but that's why your here, cause you know those that mean anything to you, know what's happening, and most all, know you for what are, not the awful projection you display or yourself at times "laughs out loudly" P.S I don't even like motor-racing but I can see this Ymenard bloke is talking the brown stuff, or talking what he wishes the situation to be, that's in both sides of the debate. You guys think you know David, "laughs out loudly" you don't know him in the slightest! "laughs out loudly" I do not condone David's activities just feel you should know a little more before thinking he's serious "laughs out loudly" and he's a wanker! "laughs out loudly" I'm sure he does plenty of the later "laughs out loudly" NUDGE NUDGE "laughs out loudly" as most of the agoraphobia sufferers on this group "laughs out loudly" As they arguing with an idiot brings you to his level, and in this case seems David has stooped to new levels of low-ness with Ymenard "laughs out loudly" I will thank you all for some good entertainment, although I don't think I'll become a regular "laughs out loudly" GCN P.S David, you know what I say about arguing with people from the American continent don't you. Its pointless as they have yet to develop a sense of humour that can take the convoluted methods of the European style. Oh and Jesus, after working in LA for a few months they can't take criticism either, same reason there all in therapy, insecurities "laughs out loudly"...as I'm sure this will prove...see I can play too! haha!

Cause i'm too stoned to type? *wink* Tom Pabst <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:KXO89.195307$[email hidden]... > Fellow R.A.S.er's (yes, that includes you too, David)............... > > I'm sorry for copying and reposting this in a new string. I know that's a > "no no" in newsgroup etiquette......but this was deeply buried in a silly > string below that I started....for fun. I believe this message plainly > explains why David Powell is so often "un-readable" and rarely seems tomake

Quoted text (120 lines)

> sense (or humor)......and this post deserves a higher spotlight than it > would have received buried in a string of a completely different topic. > > This is professed to be written by a close friend and long-term schoolmate > of Mr. Powell's.......addressed to all the rest of us on r.a.s. I'll not > make any further comment, you can form your own opinions as easily as I. > > So......may I introduce to you.............the REAL David Powell: > > TP > > ************************************************************************ > Written by: "Gareth" > r.a.s. post/string "Re: LFS - Are You Guys Easily Entertained or What?" on > 8/21/02 at 8:02 am > ************************************************************************ > > > "laughs out loud" at this mess! > > > you guys have been completely suckered! > > > May I introduce myself as a close real life friend of David's for the > last 10years in real life. I was glad to receive mail pointing me in > the direction of some tea break reading, I love a laugh. Well blow me > down! "David, said check out how many petty "muppets" there on this > group and mainly how easy you are to wind up" > > David, your ability to wind up wankers is very strong, and always has > been. I have been evilly annoyed at your ability to wind me up at > times and do so with such a calm and relaxed look in your eye, but > that's why I like you amongst a wealth of other reasons. > > I may add to Mr.Ymenard, that me old mucker Powell is completely sane, > and is doing what he does best, winding up the wanker. He has a > ability in this field I've yet to see surpassed, and being closely > involved with Courts of Law and the Police this is quite an > achievement. It's more about the way he winds people up, he turns > "reasonable", "normal" people into dribbling heaps of self > embarrassment. He has a canny ability to carry this off, I may add, he > only picks people he doesn't like or generally those others don't. I > think to him its a game, he's secure enough in his own mind to make a > tit of himself while dragging others to new found levels of > desperation. > > To me this old news I've seen it many times, I can tell you for sure, > you have been had up. Mr Powell will be sat in his desk probably > smoking another joint rubbing his hands with glee at how easy you lot > are to manipulate. > > What's really funny is, these guys think your serious "laughs out > loudly"....I mean, when it comes to driving debate you will be > serious, intensely so, I've seen James and yourself at logger heads > enough times to know that, but anything else "laughs out > loudly"...You've got that Ynemard fella feeding from your hand like a > baby.... > > Ymenard must be completely mad, funny thing is David acts mad, but > he's totally sane (well a very developed and free mind and that is > often used/seems to bring out the worst in people) just has a good > grasp of psychology, mostly uses this to wind people into a spin where > they haven't got an clue which direction to go to get out. This being > a classic example... > > Ynemard will no doubt try and weasel out of this with a load of > reversed arguments, but that's just my BA Psychology talking. > > Guys don't mess with him, he will ruin you, and all the time he's > smoking joints and "laughing out loudly" > > You shouldn't waste so much time here David, we miss you, that bloody > game has consumed you! > > Good to see you can still "wind the wanker" - "laughs out loudly" > > > I'm amazed at your resilience, as everyone here hates you! "laughs out > loudly" but that's why your here, cause you know those that mean > anything to you, know what's happening, and most all, know you for > what are, not the awful projection you display or yourself at times > "laughs out loudly" > > > P.S I don't even like motor-racing but I can see this Ymenard bloke is > talking the brown stuff, or talking what he wishes the situation to > be, that's in both sides of the debate. > > > You guys think you know David, "laughs out loudly" you don't know him > in the slightest! "laughs out loudly" > > > I do not condone David's activities just feel you should know a little > more before thinking he's serious "laughs out loudly" and he's a > wanker! "laughs out loudly" I'm sure he does plenty of the later > "laughs out loudly" NUDGE NUDGE "laughs out loudly" as most of the > agoraphobia sufferers on this group "laughs out loudly" > > As they arguing with an idiot brings you to his level, and in this > case seems David has stooped to new levels of low-ness with Ymenard > "laughs out loudly" > > I will thank you all for some good entertainment, although I don't > think I'll become a regular "laughs out loudly" > > GCN > > P.S David, you know what I say about arguing with people from the > American continent don't you. Its pointless as they have yet to > develop a sense of humour that can take the convoluted methods of the > European style. Oh and Jesus, after working in LA for a few months > they can't take criticism either, same reason there all in therapy, > insecurities "laughs out loudly"...as I'm sure this will prove...see I > can play too! haha! > > > >

Cause i'm too stoned to type? *wink*

On Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:10:18 GMT, "Tom Pabst" <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted text (16 lines)

>Written by: "Gareth" > >"laughs out loudly" >"laughs out loudly" >"laughs out loudly" >"laughs out loudly" >"laughs out loudly" >"laughs out loudly" >"laughs out loudly" >"laughs out loudly" >"laughs out loudly" >"laughs out loudly" > >after working in LA for a few months >they ( US citizens) can't take criticism either, same reason >there all in therapy, insecurities "laughs out loudly".

Hmmm.. Gareth, maybe you 'criticized' and then 'laughed out loudly' to the wrong person in LA. Did he knock your undermaintained, yellow teeth out?

I couldn't care less... Tom Pabst <[email hidden]> schreef in berichtnieuws KXO89.195307$[email hidden]... > Fellow R.A.S.er's (yes, that includes you too, David)............... > > I'm sorry for copying and reposting this in a new string. I know that's a > "no no" in newsgroup etiquette......but this was deeply buried in a silly > string below that I started....for fun. I believe this message plainly > explains why David Powell is so often "un-readable" and rarely seems tomake

Quoted text (120 lines)

> sense (or humor)......and this post deserves a higher spotlight than it > would have received buried in a string of a completely different topic. > > This is professed to be written by a close friend and long-term schoolmate > of Mr. Powell's.......addressed to all the rest of us on r.a.s. I'll not > make any further comment, you can form your own opinions as easily as I. > > So......may I introduce to you.............the REAL David Powell: > > TP > > ************************************************************************ > Written by: "Gareth" > r.a.s. post/string "Re: LFS - Are You Guys Easily Entertained or What?" on > 8/21/02 at 8:02 am > ************************************************************************ > > > "laughs out loud" at this mess! > > > you guys have been completely suckered! > > > May I introduce myself as a close real life friend of David's for the > last 10years in real life. I was glad to receive mail pointing me in > the direction of some tea break reading, I love a laugh. Well blow me > down! "David, said check out how many petty "muppets" there on this > group and mainly how easy you are to wind up" > > David, your ability to wind up wankers is very strong, and always has > been. I have been evilly annoyed at your ability to wind me up at > times and do so with such a calm and relaxed look in your eye, but > that's why I like you amongst a wealth of other reasons. > > I may add to Mr.Ymenard, that me old mucker Powell is completely sane, > and is doing what he does best, winding up the wanker. He has a > ability in this field I've yet to see surpassed, and being closely > involved with Courts of Law and the Police this is quite an > achievement. It's more about the way he winds people up, he turns > "reasonable", "normal" people into dribbling heaps of self > embarrassment. He has a canny ability to carry this off, I may add, he > only picks people he doesn't like or generally those others don't. I > think to him its a game, he's secure enough in his own mind to make a > tit of himself while dragging others to new found levels of > desperation. > > To me this old news I've seen it many times, I can tell you for sure, > you have been had up. Mr Powell will be sat in his desk probably > smoking another joint rubbing his hands with glee at how easy you lot > are to manipulate. > > What's really funny is, these guys think your serious "laughs out > loudly"....I mean, when it comes to driving debate you will be > serious, intensely so, I've seen James and yourself at logger heads > enough times to know that, but anything else "laughs out > loudly"...You've got that Ynemard fella feeding from your hand like a > baby.... > > Ymenard must be completely mad, funny thing is David acts mad, but > he's totally sane (well a very developed and free mind and that is > often used/seems to bring out the worst in people) just has a good > grasp of psychology, mostly uses this to wind people into a spin where > they haven't got an clue which direction to go to get out. This being > a classic example... > > Ynemard will no doubt try and weasel out of this with a load of > reversed arguments, but that's just my BA Psychology talking. > > Guys don't mess with him, he will ruin you, and all the time he's > smoking joints and "laughing out loudly" > > You shouldn't waste so much time here David, we miss you, that bloody > game has consumed you! > > Good to see you can still "wind the wanker" - "laughs out loudly" > > > I'm amazed at your resilience, as everyone here hates you! "laughs out > loudly" but that's why your here, cause you know those that mean > anything to you, know what's happening, and most all, know you for > what are, not the awful projection you display or yourself at times > "laughs out loudly" > > > P.S I don't even like motor-racing but I can see this Ymenard bloke is > talking the brown stuff, or talking what he wishes the situation to > be, that's in both sides of the debate. > > > You guys think you know David, "laughs out loudly" you don't know him > in the slightest! "laughs out loudly" > > > I do not condone David's activities just feel you should know a little > more before thinking he's serious "laughs out loudly" and he's a > wanker! "laughs out loudly" I'm sure he does plenty of the later > "laughs out loudly" NUDGE NUDGE "laughs out loudly" as most of the > agoraphobia sufferers on this group "laughs out loudly" > > As they arguing with an idiot brings you to his level, and in this > case seems David has stooped to new levels of low-ness with Ymenard > "laughs out loudly" > > I will thank you all for some good entertainment, although I don't > think I'll become a regular "laughs out loudly" > > GCN > > P.S David, you know what I say about arguing with people from the > American continent don't you. Its pointless as they have yet to > develop a sense of humour that can take the convoluted methods of the > European style. Oh and Jesus, after working in LA for a few months > they can't take criticism either, same reason there all in therapy, > insecurities "laughs out loudly"...as I'm sure this will prove...see I > can play too! haha! > > > >

oh dear.... "after working in LA for a few months they can't take criticism either, same reason there all in therapy, insecurities "laughs out loudly"...as I'm sure this will prove...see I can play too! haha" "as I'm sure this will prove...see I can play too!" <<< I think Gareth was trolling, or right, I can't quite work out the later yet. rrevved <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted text (25 lines)

> On Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:10:18 GMT, "Tom Pabst" <[email hidden]> wrote: > > >Written by: "Gareth" > > > >"laughs out loudly" > >"laughs out loudly" > >"laughs out loudly" > >"laughs out loudly" > >"laughs out loudly" > >"laughs out loudly" > >"laughs out loudly" > >"laughs out loudly" > >"laughs out loudly" > >"laughs out loudly" > > > >after working in LA for a few months > >they ( US citizens) can't take criticism either, same reason > >there all in therapy, insecurities "laughs out loudly". > > Hmmm.. Gareth, maybe you 'criticized' and then > 'laughed out loudly' to the wrong person in LA. > > Did he knock your undermaintained, yellow teeth out? > >

I probably am not just speaking for myself when I say... can people who use this newsgroup leave their petulent little attitudes at the door and stick to racing sims. If I remember correctly this is "rec.autos.simulators" (RAS) , not "rec.im.gonna.talk.about.myself.and.who.i.like.and.who.i.dont.and.everyone.w ill.agree.with.me", or RIGTAMAWILAWIDAEWAWM Give it a rest.

Agreed.....trying to stop it too. Sometimes, you have to fight fire with fire..... TP "Alex Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:ak0msb$lu8$[email hidden]... > I probably am not just speaking for myself when I say... can people whouse > this newsgroup leave their petulent little attitudes at the door and stick > to racing sims. If I remember correctly this is "rec.autos.simulators"(RAS) > , not >"rec.im.gonna.talk.about.myself.and.who.i.like.and.who.i.dont.and.everyone.w > ill.agree.with.me", > or RIGTAMAWILAWIDAEWAWM > > Give it a rest. > >

"Alex Smith" wrote...

Quoted text (9 lines)

> I probably am not just speaking for myself when I say... > can people who use this newsgroup leave their petulent > little attitudes at the door and stick to racing sims. > If I remember correctly this is "rec.autos.simulators" > (RAS), not "rec.im.gonna.talk.about.myself.and.who.i.like. > and.who.i.dont.and.everyone.will.agree.with.me", > or RIGTAMAWILAWIDAEWAWM > > Give it a rest.

LOL... I can't believe you just posted that! ;-) Jan. =---

Hear Hear "Alex Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:ak0msb$lu8$[email hidden]... > I probably am not just speaking for myself when I say... can people whouse > this newsgroup leave their petulent little attitudes at the door and stick > to racing sims. If I remember correctly this is "rec.autos.simulators"(RAS) > , not >"rec.im.gonna.talk.about.myself.and.who.i.like.and.who.i.dont.and.everyone.w > ill.agree.with.me", > or RIGTAMAWILAWIDAEWAWM > > Give it a rest. > >

Hear Hear "rec.im.gonna.talk.about.myself.and.who.i.like.and.who.i.dont.and.everyone.w

"Alex Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:ak0msb$lu8$[email hidden]... > I probably am not just speaking for myself when I say... can people whouse > this newsgroup leave their petulent little attitudes at the door and stick > to racing sims. If I remember correctly this is "rec.autos.simulators"(RAS) > , not >"rec.im.gonna.talk.about.myself.and.who.i.like.and.who.i.dont.and.everyone.w > ill.agree.with.me", > or RIGTAMAWILAWIDAEWAWM > > Give it a rest. > > AGREED ...take it to email or celebrity deathmatch ;) Ash

"Tom Pabst" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<KXO89.195307$[email hidden]>...

Quoted text (15 lines)

> Fellow R.A.S.er's (yes, that includes you too, David)............... > > I'm sorry for copying and reposting this in a new string. I know that's a > "no no" in newsgroup etiquette......but this was deeply buried in a silly > string below that I started....for fun. I believe this message plainly > explains why David Powell is so often "un-readable" and rarely seems to make > sense (or humor)......and this post deserves a higher spotlight than it > would have received buried in a string of a completely different topic. > > This is professed to be written by a close friend and long-term schoolmate > of Mr. Powell's.......addressed to all the rest of us on r.a.s. I'll not > make any further comment, you can form your own opinions as easily as I. > > So......may I introduce to you.............the REAL David Powell: >

Who cares? The Powell/Menard exchange might be worth reading if it was even slightly entertaining, or intelligent flameage, but it's just boring. -- Cpl Hicks.

Yep. John "Ashley McConnell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:ak299b$a7h$[email hidden]... > > "Alex Smith" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:ak0msb$lu8$[email hidden]... > > I probably am not just speaking for myself when I say... can people who > use > > this newsgroup leave their petulent little attitudes at the door andstick > > to racing sims. If I remember correctly this is "rec.autos.simulators" > (RAS) > > , not > > >"rec.im.gonna.talk.about.myself.and.who.i.like.and.who.i.dont.and.everyone.w

Quoted text (14 lines)

> > ill.agree.with.me", > > or RIGTAMAWILAWIDAEWAWM > > > > Give it a rest. > > > > > > AGREED > > ...take it to email or celebrity deathmatch ;) > > Ash > >