God bless the troops that protect us.

Have a happy memorial day all current and former soldiers who serve/served honorably. I salute you all!!!! Mitch Flip off a liberal today and earn extra points

Mitch A wrote: > Have a happy memorial day all current and former soldiers who serve/served > honorably. I salute you all!!!! > > Mitch > > I'm all for that. But...

Quoted text (8 lines)

> > > > > > Flip off a liberal today and earn extra points > >

...this just makes you look stupid.

"Mitch A" wrote... > <snip> I'm sure all "combat deployed" troops are doing as good a job as can be humanly expected of them and, if nothing else and as a (retired) army reserve, I respect and honour their sense of duty. I do feel, however, it's a mistake to confuse their sacrifice with the moral and ethical validity of their orders. Jan. =---

"Jan Verschueren" wrote... >> <snip> > I do feel, however, it's a mistake to confuse their sacrifice with > the moral and ethical validity of their orders. Having said (and meant) that, what's up with this site (just been spammed the link by e-mail): http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm#Main Quite apart from the security camera stills showing the plane flying towards the building, then erupting into a fireball, the FAA report on the crash and all the other evidence, what do they suggest happened to the plane and its occupants supposing it wasn't flown into the Pentagon? -is the Bermuda triangle shifting to Washington suddenly more plausible than someone hijacking a plane and using it as a bomb? They must take us for fools. Jan. =---

I have many friends currently/formerly the military and a very very large percentage feel this is an honorable mission. 25 million free people is nothing to sneeze at but you would think otherwise based on the endless whining from the anti-everything (ponytail) crowd. You hint as much in your post as well. Any real soldier knows that "war is hell" but for some odd reason the mainstream media/liberals think we can wage a war without death and destruction (The Danica/Cornacova sp? effect). As far as Im concerned their is no such thing as a politically correct war and trying to wage one proves once again how delirious some people are. Saddam was/is a disgusting human being (and I use the term loosely) and anyone on his side is my enemy.. I don;t hear Fischer spewing her crocodile tears bullshit about the (literally) millions of human beings Saddam and his band of scum killed during his tenure but she sure doesnt hesitate to spew bullshit about US soldiers before an investigation is even complete. Sad little bitches her and her girlfriend Freddy/Rex/Larry Bakesmith are. Whats your address in Jersey Fischer? I have some military friends that live nearby and would like to have a discussion with you, in person, regarding your recent post. Anyone give me odds on the likelihood of this happening? LOL...... He won't because then everyone will know he's 40, jobless and living in Mommies basement reading the Daily KOS.... Mitch "Jan Verschueren" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:91reg.452979$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (14 lines)

> "Mitch A" wrote... >> <snip> > > I'm sure all "combat deployed" troops are doing as good a job as can be > humanly expected of them and, if nothing else and as a (retired) army > reserve, I respect and honour their sense of duty. > > I do feel, however, it's a mistake to confuse their sacrifice with the > moral and ethical validity of their orders. > > Jan. > =--- > >

Just in case you missed it. Talk about cowards.... >One thing the u.s. has proven it can do better than anyone is to lie, and >then send a bunch of coward, vile, scumbags to another country and have >themslaughter little children. Even 8 month old babies. They also murder their mothers, old ladies, and old men in wheelchairs who have one leg.

Just in case you missed it. Talk about cowards.... slaughter little children. Even 8 month old babies. They also *** their mothers, old ladies, and old men in wheelchairs who have one leg.

Mitch A wrote:

Quoted text (11 lines)

> Just in case you missed it. Talk about cowards.... > > > >> One thing the u.s. has proven it can do better than anyone is to lie, and >> then send a bunch of coward, vile, scumbags to another country and have >> them > slaughter little children. Even 8 month old babies. They also murder their > mothers, old ladies, and old men in wheelchairs who have one leg. > >

Mitch, we just want to know why they do it

"Mitch A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:W_reg.41969$[email hidden]... || Any real soldier knows that "war is hell" but for some odd reason the | mainstream media/liberals think we can wage a war without death and | destruction. As far as Im concerned their | is no such thing as a politically correct war and trying to wage one proves | once again how delirious some people are. |I think maybe you watch too much television, and are listening to what others say about this mainstream media. I haven't watched a national news segment in over twenty years. I try to watch things-- when I do watch, which is not all that often-- that afford no commentary. You might try doing the same, and make up your own mind about things instead of listening to what others say you should think. (BTW, it is my belief that all this politcal correctness BS is a way to turn the tables and deny any kind of free speech. And it's the ones complaining about the absurdness of trying to be politically correct who are at the root of the problem.) | Saddam was/is a disgusting human being (and I use the term loosely) and | anyone on his side is my enemy.. | That may be the case, but America is not the world's police at all times everywhere. There are more effective, longer-lasting ways of ridding the world of pestilence rather than just bombing them. It's like the parent who resorts to physically hitting a child-- that's a LAST resort (i.e., "never"). If that doesn't work, the parent is finished. War did not work with the Iraqis, and now America might be finished. | I don;t hear Fischer spewing her crocodile tears bullshit about the | (literally) millions of human beings Saddam and his band of scum killed | during his tenure but she sure doesnt hesitate to spew bullshit about US | soldiers before an investigation is even complete. Sad little bitches her | and her girlfriend Freddy/Rex/Larry Bakesmith are. |I see you have a clear head about all this. Why are you worrying what other people do? Worry about what you do: it's hard to control the actions of others. |Whats your address in Jersey Fischer? I have some military friends that | live nearby and would like to have a discussion with you, in person, | regarding your recent post. Anyone give me odds on the likelihood of this | happening? LOL...... He won't because then everyone will know he's 40, | jobless and living in Mommies basement reading the Daily KOS.... | I think you'd better see a doctor. Alanb

Classic! Alan proves once again he's incapable of rational thought (as your reply email addy clearly shows) or reading comprehension and obviously mind reading isn't his specialty either.... Yeah you get your info from a website, it has to be true in that case eh... Sheeesh after partying all day I'd hoped for something better than this drivel in response. You let me down once again Alan. No we arent the Worlds police force but we sure as hell cant wait for the Europeans to do anything... History is CLEARLY on this side. The Useless Nations (as horrible as they are) gave the Authority in how many resolutions again? Don't let facts and the truth get in your way OK. You have drool rolling down your chin better get a Kleenex <vbseg> Mitch "Alan Bernardo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

Why don;t you go look for your sense of humor, it's MIA. I guess with a name like Smuck I wouldnt laugh at much either, lol. "Derek Smuck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:qObeg.3969

Mitch A wrote:

Quoted text (23 lines)

> Classic! > > Alan proves once again he's incapable of rational thought (as your reply > email addy clearly shows) or reading comprehension and obviously mind > reading isn't his specialty either.... > > Yeah you get your info from a website, it has to be true in that case eh... > Sheeesh after partying all day I'd hoped for something better than this > drivel in response. You let me down once again Alan. > > No we arent the Worlds police force but we sure as hell cant wait for the > Europeans to do anything... History is CLEARLY on this side. The Useless > Nations (as horrible as they are) gave the Authority in how many resolutions > again? Don't let facts and the truth get in your way OK. > > You have drool rolling down your chin better get a Kleenex <vbseg> > > Mitch > > > "Alan Bernardo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > >

Why did the Useless Nations get to create a country in 1948?

>Flip off a liberal today and earn extra points Wouldn't it be more challenging to flip off different liberals instead of the same ones over and over again?

"Mitch A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:oLveg.97328$[email hidden]... | Classic! | | Alan proves once again he's incapable of rational thought (as your reply | email addy clearly shows) or reading comprehension and obviously mind | reading isn't his specialty either.... | I see. I'm incapable of rational thought because of my reply address (which is intended to blast all politicians), but yet you refuse to address any of the issues in my last post concerning yourself and your own ideas, clearly gleaned from the media, which you so very much detest. Yeah you get your info from a website, it has to be true in that case eh... huh? | Sheeesh after partying all day I'd hoped for something better than this | drivel in response. You let me down once again Alan. | | This might be a part of your problem. | No we arent the Worlds police force but we sure as hell cant wait for the | Europeans to do anything... The US has been around for a little over 200 years. Europe has been around a considerable longer time. I think the US could learn something from the Europeans. The only problem with the US is that they have so much money and resources, they only know one method: War and anihilation. | | You have drool rolling down your chin better get a Kleenex <vbseg> | I don't typically continue to argue with someone who cannot fathom the proper use of the comma or how the possessive works, or with someone who puts stupid things inside greater than and less-than signs. As such, I'll stop here, allowing you more time to read and try to figure things for yourself, rather than letting others think for you. Alanb

IT IS THE SOLDIER It is the Soldier, not the minister Who has given us freedom of religion. It is the Soldier, not the reporter Who has given us freedom of the press. It is the Soldier, not the poet Who has given us freedom of speech. It is the Soldier, not the campus organizer Who has given us freedom to protest. It is the Soldier, not the lawyer Who has given us the right to a fair trial. It is the Soldier, not the politician Who has given us the right to vote. It is the Soldier who salutes the flag, Who serves beneath the flag, And whose coffin is draped by the flag, Who allows the protester to burn the flag. "Alan Bernardo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

Ooops wrong button. See above. No it shows you have an agenda based on your insane ramblings of the left. Perhaps we have different diffintion of a Party. You and your crack me and my cake LOL. As you say, Europe has been around loger. Long enough to lose any ratioanal thought I guess. When all else fails attack the grammar or sentence structure. Classic ANAL!!! More? Mitch

Hell, my wife is a liberal. Then again it comes naturally to women. The motherly instinct is quite strong in women and thats understandable from a natural perspective What I cannot understand is a MAN acting like a woman... Mitch "mcewena" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > >Flip off a liberal today and earn extra points > > Wouldn't it be more challenging to flip off different liberals instead > of the same ones over and over again? >

Mitch A wrote: > Hell, my wife is a liberal. Who's flicking her off then, I wonder. ;-)

Quoted text (12 lines)

> > "mcewena" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > >>>Flip off a liberal today and earn extra points >> >>Wouldn't it be more challenging to flip off different liberals instead >>of the same ones over and over again? >> > > >

Today is a day to honor those who have made the ultimate sacrifice of their life blood for the values of a liberal democracy that is the foundation of what has made America great. May God strike down the corrupt leaders who have sent them to be killed and maimed for lies. Marty Mitch A wrote:

Quoted text (15 lines)

> Have a happy memorial day all current and former soldiers who serve/served > honorably. I salute you all!!!! > > Mitch > > > > > > > > Flip off a liberal today and earn extra points > > >

Mitch A wrote: > I have many friends currently/formerly the military and a very very large > percentage feel this is an honorable mission. 25 million free people is > nothing to sneeze at but you would think otherwise based on the endless > whining from the anti-everything (ponytail) crowd. You hint as much in your > post as well. <sniped/blah, blah, blah, predictable mean vile obscenities> ---------------------------------------- "Poll of troops in Iraq sees 72% support for withdrawal within a year. Seventy-two percent of troops on the ground in Iraq think U.S. military forces should get out of the country within a year, according to a Zogby poll released Tuesday." By Leo Shane III, Stars and Stripes Mideast edition, Wednesday, March 1, 2006 http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=34538&archive=true ---------------------------- Fool. Marty

Marty_U wrote:

Quoted text (23 lines)

> Mitch A wrote: >> I have many friends currently/formerly the military and a very very >> large percentage feel this is an honorable mission. 25 million free >> people is nothing to sneeze at but you would think otherwise based on >> the endless whining from the anti-everything (ponytail) crowd. You >> hint as much in your post as well. > > <sniped/blah, blah, blah, predictable mean vile obscenities> > > ---------------------------------------- > "Poll of troops in Iraq sees 72% support for withdrawal within a year. > > Seventy-two percent of troops on the ground in Iraq think U.S. military > forces should get out of the country within a year, according to a Zogby > poll released Tuesday." > > By Leo Shane III, Stars and Stripes > Mideast edition, Wednesday, March 1, 2006 > http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=34538&archive=true > ---------------------------- > Fool. > > Marty

LIBERAL GO TO IRAQ

"Mitch A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:kkaeg.102305$[email hidden]... > Have a happy memorial day all current and former soldiers who serve/served > honorably. I salute you all!!!! > Especially all the women, homosexuals and men who think there's nothing wrong with sex with 2nd hand women. Fuck only know's what any of you think you're protecting but good luck to you anyway. With luck, you won't get your head blown off and you can return to the good ole U.S of A where you can live out the rest of your life as a cunt amongst your fellow cunts! Glory, glory, hallelujah ! LOL.

"Mitch A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:W_reg.41969$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (7 lines)

> > Any real soldier knows that "war is hell" but for some odd reason the > mainstream media/liberals think we can wage a war without death and > destruction (The Danica/Cornacova sp? effect). As far as Im concerned > their is no such thing as a politically correct war and trying to wage one > proves once again how delirious some people are. >

Any "real" soldier (not spelt "slave zombie") does not commit to combat due to a leader being unable to get the right group (Bin Laden) and so taking it out on an already beaten but not entirely finished off (due to George W's old man) group (Saddam/Iraq). The "Coalition of the willing" are pathetic little children in the eyes of all but other pathetic little children. In combat in a civilian zone and non desperate circumstances, the use of puppy drug addicts in the field, or even any troop under the age of 21 or so, is inexcusable. Uniforms are not in play here and the line between enemy and innocent civilian is blury to say the least. Imagine how blury that line is to a teenager and then imagine how blury it is to one on drugs! Clearly, bullets are getting sprayed around on a whim in many cases. Just a joke. And this is not even taking into account the morality and character of any individuals either!

"Alan Bernardo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted text (9 lines)

> > That may be the case, but America is not the world's police at all times > everywhere. There are more effective, longer-lasting ways of ridding the > world of pestilence rather than just bombing them. It's like the parent > who > resorts to physically hitting a child-- that's a LAST resort (i.e., > "never"). If that doesn't work, the parent is finished. War did not work > with the Iraqis, and now America might be finished. >

Just a note here - in this country (australia), hitting a child is not a last resort - it's a trip to prison and an excuse for the gov't to steal your children. This is the great democracy we ar bringing to Iraq. LOL. Such laws get passed since the gov't is full of the fucked who wish to fuck everyone else. Also, since they have no character and standards to pass to there children they have no need for such tools ie the odd belt over the earhole for a child in the grip of a cunt of a god or just plain stupidity. The best way to fuck your own children over is to stand by and watch them fall into every trap here on planet earth - something that is inevitable without 1st rate parental guidance. And part of 1st rate parental guidance is the odd belt over the head or whatever is needed to purge the demons.

"Mitch A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:hqGeg.35932$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (24 lines)

> IT IS THE SOLDIER > It is the Soldier, not the minister > Who has given us freedom of religion. > > It is the Soldier, not the reporter > Who has given us freedom of the press. > > It is the Soldier, not the poet > Who has given us freedom of speech. > > It is the Soldier, not the campus organizer > Who has given us freedom to protest. > > It is the Soldier, not the lawyer > Who has given us the right to a fair trial. > > It is the Soldier, not the politician > Who has given us the right to vote. > > It is the Soldier who salutes the flag, > Who serves beneath the flag, > And whose coffin is draped by the flag, > Who allows the protester to burn the flag. >

It is the bad soldier that kills children and the innocent It is the bad soldier that spreads homosexuality in Iraq It is the bad soldier that inspires people to level things like the twin towers etc, etc, etc

"Byron Forbes" <[email hidden]> wrote in

Quoted text (14 lines)

>> > > It is the bad soldier that kills children and the innocent > > It is the bad soldier that spreads homosexuality in Iraq > > It is the bad soldier that inspires people to level things like > the twin > towers > > etc, etc, etc > > >

The first one I agree. The second one, I have no knowledge and don't understand why homesexuality is bad to spread. Now..Aids..that is different. From what read of Abu Graib..it was Iraqi men raping Iraqi young men at the wink and nod of America. The third one...I don't see the connection. Bin Laden's beef was with having Infidels stationed in the Holy Land(Saudi Arabia) And having the Saudi Prince choose America to defend them instead of the Mujahadeen(sp?) Other Wahabi terrorists have used our decadent lifestyle as reason enough to destroy and kill. The al-qaida group was attacking because we are the USA, not because we are USA Soldiers. While they did strike directly at US military, (USS Cole, The Khobar Towers) they also directed attacks at symbols of the US goverment, like the two embassies in Africa that were bombed and...one might argue...the two separate attacks on the Twin Towers. So a bad soldier is just as much a symbol of the Goverment as a good soldier. To groups like Al Quaida, there is zero difference. And most of these attacks took place against a Democratic President, they do not care about our petty distinctions. It is the USA they attack because we are the USA, not because a Republican President is in power, or, as shown above, a Democratic one. I figure we will see several Murder trials resulting from the Hadifa shootings. Already there have been officers that have been releived of command.(a career death sentence if nothing else) The actions of the 'bad' soldiers will be punished. I doubt though, that the punishments of the Marines will sate the hatred of the military by many. I work in an industry that is flooded with retired Vetrans, and they span the gamut of good to bad. As with ANY group, beit Middle Eastern Madrassa Teachers, Politicians, citizens, and even college educated proffesionals, there will be evil in every group. Joining the Army does not guarentee there are no bad apples, just as joining a political party does not guarentee that all the elected officials will be motivated to act in the best interests of their constituants. I will end this by declaring my support of the United States Soldier. I do not hate them, I am not any more disgusted of their actions than I am of any group. I marvel at the sacrifices they make on my behalf. dave henrie

Byron Forbes wrote:

Quoted text (30 lines)

> "Mitch A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:hqGeg.35932$[email hidden]... > >> IT IS THE SOLDIER >> It is the Soldier, not the minister >> Who has given us freedom of religion. >> >> It is the Soldier, not the reporter >> Who has given us freedom of the press. >> >> It is the Soldier, not the poet >> Who has given us freedom of speech. >> >> It is the Soldier, not the campus organizer >> Who has given us freedom to protest. >> >> It is the Soldier, not the lawyer >> Who has given us the right to a fair trial. >> >> It is the Soldier, not the politician >> Who has given us the right to vote. >> >> It is the Soldier who salutes the flag, >> Who serves beneath the flag, >> And whose coffin is draped by the flag, >> Who allows the protester to burn the flag. >> > > > It is the bad soldier that spreads homosexuality in Iraq

Why is that bad?

Marty_U <[email hidden]> wrote in news:447bb471@user-4jkyi8khqn.: > "Poll of troops in Iraq sees 72% support for withdrawal within a year. > > Seventy-two percent of troops on the ground in Iraq think U.S. military > forces should get out of the country within a year, according to a Zogby > poll released Tuesday." how nice. I'm sure when the Military is run as a democracy then the results of such a poll would be relevant. Without knowing the internals of such a poll, the numbers are meaningless. I can site the record numbers of re-inlistments as just as valid or non-valid a number as the above poll. for example.. Question: If the Iraqi Military/Police proved they could defend the populace, would you want to leave Iraq by the end of the year? for example: Question: Since we all know there will be no victory in Iraq, do you want to leave by year's end or wait til the politicians feel they have run out of Grunts to kill? for example: Question. Do you agree with President Bush's plan to reduce troop strength as the Iraqi Goverment proves it can defend it's people? If so, would you hope this was possible by year's end? for example: Question. If you knew the Iranian backed insurgents would have free reign to murder possibly millions of Iraqis after a premature US pullout. would you still want to leave by year's end? for example: Question. If you knew this topic was out of the realm of this newsgroup and you continued to post anyway, would you therefore expect everyone else to be just as frivolous with any rule and therefore our soldiers would be completely justified in any action they took against any group? dave henrie

Marty_U <[email hidden]> wrote in news:447bb11f@user-4jkyi8khqn.: > May God strike down the corrupt leaders who have sent them to be killed > and maimed for lies. So when the previous Democratic Presidential canditate stated that Saddam must be dis-armed, was he lieing? When the previous democratic President declared Iraq a terrorist state and signed legislation that stated 'regime change', was he lieing? So when the leader of the CIA, a man appointed first by a Democratic President said that the presense of WMD in IRAQ was a slam dunk, was HE lieing? When the King of Jordan stated that Iraq had WMD, When the President of Egypt stated to General Franks that Saddam had many WMD, When the intelligence agencies of Russia, France, Germany, England, Israel, along with dozens of other countries...were they ALL lieing? When the former National Security Advisor to President Clinton stole and destroyed classified documents from the National Archives...was that corrupt? When a private detective, hired by the subbordinates of President Clinton and a man with ZERO clearance, aquired hundreds of IRS files of US citizens, was that not only corrupt but spying on Americans? If one is to make such horrific statements, at least one could do is provide some sort of proof that lieing took place. If one was to charge politicians as corrupt, the least he could do is tell us WHICH politicians were corrupt and why. If one is to blindly beleive that only the OTHERSIDE is bad bad bad, then one must not have a very firm grasp of reality. The reality is...Political parties are all exactly the same, they all do that which benefits themselves.. There was a President that was for Tax Cuts, that was for foreign intervention, that was for clandestine regime change. This President was Democrat JFK. There was a President was for the arrest and detention of hundreds of thousands of US citizens all without any warrants. This President replaced the entire Supreme court. This President was Democrat. There was a President who allowed his underlings to break laws and steal sensitive information. This President then used his power to protect those under him. This President also used the IRS to punish those who criticized him. This President was Republican. There was a President who suborned Perjury and allowed his lawyer in a court of law to perpetuate this perjury, this president bald-facedly lied to the American people on camera and then had his entire cabinet criss- cross the country to defend and repeat the lie. Another President suspended parts of the Constitution and deported some political opponents. That president was Republican. Please folks..wake up. We are not served by crucifying our opponents while totally ignoring behavior that is identical or even worse from those whom you support. Yes the Republicans have done wrong. But to suggest, that ONLY the Republicans are corrupt, is sooo naive. And did you notice that not ONCE, not a single solitary time, did I insult. I have, and continue to post without screaming invective at either side. dave henrie

Quoted text (61 lines)

>> May God strike down the corrupt leaders who have sent them to be killed >> and maimed for lies. > > So when the previous Democratic Presidential canditate stated that Saddam > must be dis-armed, was he lieing? When the previous democratic President > declared Iraq a terrorist state and signed legislation that stated 'regime > change', was he lieing? So when the leader of the CIA, a man appointed > first by a Democratic President said that the presense of WMD in IRAQ was > a > slam dunk, was HE lieing? When the King of Jordan stated that Iraq had > WMD, When the President of Egypt stated to General Franks that Saddam had > many WMD, When the intelligence agencies of Russia, France, Germany, > England, Israel, along with dozens of other countries...were they ALL > lieing? > When the former National Security Advisor to President Clinton stole and > destroyed classified documents from the National Archives...was that > corrupt? When a private detective, hired by the subbordinates of > President > Clinton and a man with ZERO clearance, aquired hundreds of IRS files of > US > citizens, was that not only corrupt but spying on Americans? > If one is to make such horrific statements, at least one could do is > provide some sort of proof that lieing took place. If one was to charge > politicians as corrupt, the least he could do is tell us WHICH politicians > were corrupt and why. If one is to blindly beleive that only the > OTHERSIDE > is bad bad bad, then one must not have a very firm grasp of reality. The > reality is...Political parties are all exactly the same, they all do that > which benefits themselves.. > > There was a President that was for Tax Cuts, that was for foreign > intervention, that was for clandestine regime change. This President was > Democrat JFK. > There was a President was for the arrest and detention of hundreds of > thousands of US citizens all without any warrants. This President > replaced > the entire Supreme court. This President was Democrat. > There was a President who allowed his underlings to break laws and steal > sensitive information. This President then used his power to protect > those > under him. This President also used the IRS to punish those who > criticized > him. This President was Republican. > There was a President who suborned Perjury and allowed his lawyer in a > court of law to perpetuate this perjury, this president bald-facedly lied > to the American people on camera and then had his entire cabinet criss- > cross the country to defend and repeat the lie. > Another President suspended parts of the Constitution and deported some > political opponents. That president was Republican. > > Please folks..wake up. We are not served by crucifying our opponents > while > totally ignoring behavior that is identical or even worse from those whom > you support. Yes the Republicans have done wrong. But to suggest, that > ONLY the Republicans are corrupt, is sooo naive. > > And did you notice that not ONCE, not a single solitary time, did I > insult. I have, and continue to post without screaming invective at > either > side. > dave henrie

The most annoying thing about Liberal anti-war tree huggers is that they are right but do not know how to implement their philosophies. Check out Neil Young's new CD "Living With War". It's probably his finest album to date and that's saying something. It's because he's writing and singing with passion but, unfortunately, as with all these well meaning, Dudley do rights, they can never actually explain how all this peace love and understanding is going to come about. Shame, as most of what they strive for is perfectly reasonable. Just un-achievable. How do the explain Nanking, the holocaust or any other atrocity ? It's because there are human beings(?) among us that have never been influenced by any political thinking. They have a different agenda.

Well said Ted. I also agree with some of those ideas but as you say (kinda) and "an idea does not a solution make". lol. Problem is we give an inch and they take a mile with their socialist agenda. Everyone isnt equal. Equality comes from desire, hard work, and ability not some scumbag politicians penstroke. If someone want to bitch at something why not attack the real enemy, Congress.... Mitch "redTed" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:447c28e8$0$18314$[email hidden]...

You are one strange person. "Byron Forbes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > Especially all the women, homosexuals and men who think there's nothing

Quoted text (9 lines)

> wrong with sex with 2nd hand women. Fuck only know's what any of you think > you're protecting but good luck to you anyway. With luck, you won't get > your head blown off and you can return to the good ole U.S of A where you > can live out the rest of your life as a cunt amongst your fellow cunts! > > Glory, glory, hallelujah ! > > LOL. >

You are one strange person. all the women, ***s and men who think there's nothing

Nobody ever said democracy is perfect. "Byron Forbes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

Quoted text (10 lines)

> Such laws get passed since the gov't is full of the fucked who wish to > fuck everyone else. Also, since they have no character and standards to > pass to there children they have no need for such tools ie the odd belt > over the earhole for a child in the grip of a cunt of a god or just plain > stupidity. The best way to fuck your own children over is to stand by and > watch them fall into every trap here on planet earth - something that is > inevitable without 1st rate parental guidance. And part of 1st rate > parental guidance is the odd belt over the head or whatever is needed to > purge the demons. >

"Mitch A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:2zGeg.35938$[email hidden]... | Ooops wrong button. See above. | | | No it shows you have an agenda based on your insane ramblings of the left. | I see. Just remember what Dylan said, They say that patriotism is the last refuge To which a scoundrel clings. Excessive patriotism is bad, plain bad. And you got it bad, blind to the bad policies of America. | Perhaps we have different diffintion of a Party. You and your crack me and | my cake LOL. | This makes little sense. And it's "definition", my kind friend. Those who have problems writing clearly have problems thinking clearly. | As you say, Europe has been around loger. Long enough to lose any ratioanal | thought I guess. | Europe has more experience in diplomacy, for the most part. America is like the parent who resorts to corporeal punishment. | When all else fails attack the grammar or sentence structure. Classic | ANAL!!! | |That's classic alright: and a very common response, when all else fails. I'll talk to you when you get some better ideas, which might be a while. Alanb

"Alan Bernardo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted text (14 lines)

> > "Mitch A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:2zGeg.35938$[email hidden]... > | Ooops wrong button. See above. > | > | > | No it shows you have an agenda based on your insane ramblings of the > left. > | > > I see. Just remember what Dylan said, > > They say that patriotism is the last refuge > To which a scoundrel clings.

Who really cares what some stoner song writer "has been" from the 60's thinks? You and your nutjob friends thats who. I guess Barbara Streisand, Mike Moore or G.Clooney will be making American foreign policy next LOLOLOL. > > Excessive patriotism is bad, plain bad. And you got it bad, blind to the > bad policies of America. Your baseless assumptions are hilarious. Do you honestly think Im pro gov? Youre mistaken. The only reason I sound even slightly repblican is because the Repubs (used to) believe government was bad while the socialist Dems think the Gov shoudl run it all. Its been proven Big Gov is bad individual responsibilty is good. Congress is chock full of proven crooks on all sides (looking to protect themselves) yet all you can do is attack Bush. Does that make sense? Not to me.

Quoted text (9 lines)

> > | Perhaps we have different diffintion of a Party. You and your crack me > and > | my cake LOL. > | > > This makes little sense. And it's "definition", my kind friend. Those > who > have problems writing clearly have problems thinking clearly.

Once again when you cannot argue the facts you resort to some sort of opaque childish insult of my grammar or spelling, how sad you are..

Quoted text (9 lines)

> > | As you say, Europe has been around loger. Long enough to lose any > ratioanal > | thought I guess. > | > > Europe has more experience in diplomacy, for the most part. America is > like > the parent who resorts to corporeal punishment.

Diplomacy only works when both sides are honest. You and your third world bretheran are not honest. Although youve put up a total mental block on the subject anyone with any common sense can recall how well Diplomacy worked in Iraq. The UN (and the Euros, china and Russia) undermined every aspect of diplomacy for their own self interest (oil). Ive read the reports on the Oil for Food scam but you think its just another US conspiracy.... America is full of spoiled brats that don;t respect anything but their own self interests. When a child doesnt learn respect we end up with Europe, San Francisco, New York, Chicago, Atlanta and LA. Bye now....

Especially when Iraq votes in a terrorist government like Palestine did. Good planning guys! MitchA wrote:

Quoted text (15 lines)

> Nobody ever said democracy is perfect. > > "Byron Forbes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> Such laws get passed since the gov't is full of the fucked who wish to >> fuck everyone else. Also, since they have no character and standards to >> pass to there children they have no need for such tools ie the odd belt >> over the earhole for a child in the grip of a cunt of a god or just plain >> stupidity. The best way to fuck your own children over is to stand by and >> watch them fall into every trap here on planet earth - something that is >> inevitable without 1st rate parental guidance. And part of 1st rate >> parental guidance is the odd belt over the head or whatever is needed to >> purge the demons. >> > >

Dave Henrie wrote:

Quoted text (9 lines)

> Marty_U <[email hidden]> wrote in news:447bb11f@user-4jkyi8khqn.: > >> May God strike down the corrupt leaders who have sent them to be killed >> and maimed for lies. > > So when the previous Democratic Presidential canditate stated that Saddam > must be dis-armed, was he lieing? When the previous democratic President > declared Iraq a terrorist state and signed legislation that stated 'regime > change', was he lieing?

YES! He was lying. Imagine, a democrat and a republican both wrong! The world is ending! How can there be more than 2 sides. My poor American brain can't handle that!

LOLOLOL Kettle meet Pot "MitchA" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:a%_eg.88351$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (16 lines)

> You are one strange person. > > "Byron Forbes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > Especially > all the women, homosexuals and men who think there's nothing >> wrong with sex with 2nd hand women. Fuck only know's what any of you >> think you're protecting but good luck to you anyway. With luck, you won't >> get your head blown off and you can return to the good ole U.S of A where >> you can live out the rest of your life as a cunt amongst your fellow >> cunts! >> >> Glory, glory, hallelujah ! >> >> LOL. >> > >

"Dave Henrie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted text (7 lines)

> "Byron Forbes" <[email hidden]> wrote in > > I will end this by declaring my support of the United States Soldier. > I do not hate them, I am not any more disgusted of their actions than I > am of any group. I marvel at the sacrifices they make on my behalf. > > dave henrie

It is indeed pointless to hate the soldiers. They are acting under orders. However, they are also representatives of the U.S. and more particularly the U.S. government.

"Derek Smuck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:UlReg.4653$[email hidden]... > Byron Forbes wrote: >> >> It is the bad soldier that spreads homosexuality in Iraq > > Why is that bad? So there's nothing wrong with taking it up the arse then? LOL. In my world - Priority #1 is avoiding the above. Priority #2 is not having sex with a 2nd hand women. Priority #3 is avoiding physical death Priorty #3 pales into insignificance compared to the other 2. No point in physical life if one is spiritually dead! :)

Yes, and by this planets definitions of what "normal" is - THANK FUCK FOR THAT! LOL "MitchA" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:a%_eg.88351$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (16 lines)

> You are one strange person. > > "Byron Forbes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > Especially > all the women, homosexuals and men who think there's nothing >> wrong with sex with 2nd hand women. Fuck only know's what any of you >> think you're protecting but good luck to you anyway. With luck, you won't >> get your head blown off and you can return to the good ole U.S of A where >> you can live out the rest of your life as a cunt amongst your fellow >> cunts! >> >> Glory, glory, hallelujah ! >> >> LOL. >> > >

Quoted text (14 lines)

>>> It is the bad soldier that spreads homosexuality in Iraq >> >> Why is that bad? > > So there's nothing wrong with taking it up the arse then? LOL. > > In my world - > > Priority #1 is avoiding the above. > Priority #2 is not having sex with a 2nd hand women. > Priority #3 is avoiding physical death > > Priorty #3 pales into insignificance compared to the other 2. No point > in physical life if one is spiritually dead! :)

Second hand women as in...non virgins ?? What the fuck are you putting in your Foster's, blue ?

Second hand women as in...non ***s ?? What the *** are you putting in your Foster's, blue ?

rex roland <[email hidden]> wrote in news:0R2fg.11985$cB3.3818 @tornado.tampabay.rr.com: > > YES! He was lying. Imagine, a democrat and a republican both wrong! The > world is ending! How can there be more than 2 sides. My poor American > brain can't handle that! Then to what purpose would two leaders of different parties tell the same lie? What benefit, what gain did each seek by telling the lie. To say someone lied is far far FAR different than to say someone was wrong. dave henrie

Byron Forbes wrote:

Quoted text (8 lines)

> In my world - > > Priority #1 is avoiding the above. > Priority #2 is not having sex with a 2nd hand women. > Priority #3 is avoiding physical death > > Priorty #3 pales into insignificance compared to the other 2. No point > in physical life if one is spiritually dead! :)

Wow, that's some seriously twisted world, glad I don't live there. What is this second hand women thing you've made up? No one over fourteen years old? Don McCorkle

I second that!! "Mitch A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:kkaeg.102305$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (15 lines)

> Have a happy memorial day all current and former soldiers who serve/served > honorably. I salute you all!!!! > > Mitch > > > > > > > > Flip off a liberal today and earn extra points > > >

"Woodie83" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted text (15 lines)

> Byron Forbes wrote: > >> In my world - >> >> Priority #1 is avoiding the above. >> Priority #2 is not having sex with a 2nd hand women. >> Priority #3 is avoiding physical death >> >> Priorty #3 pales into insignificance compared to the other 2. No >> point in physical life if one is spiritually dead! :) > > Wow, that's some seriously twisted world, glad I don't live there. What > is this second hand women thing you've made up? No one over fourteen > years old? >

Yes, well the world is rome after all. I'm one of those that is entirely uninterested in being a roman - I like to fly first class only which is, in fact, a huge understatement. Maybe saying that I like my human existence to mean something is a better way of puting it. If there's nothing wrong with sex with a 2nd hand woman then there's nothing wrong with anything now is there? The idea of it has always made me want to vomit - I guess some have never tasted pride - pity. It is a genuine tragedy that there are so many in the world that know no better. No doubt, the likes of you will curse your own children with your pathetic lifestyle as well - truely tragic. It will mean absolutely nothing to be human on this planrt soon.

Maybe I'm wrong but didnt the Heavens Gate crowd already catch their ride to the Mother Ship? I guess Byron missed that last newsletter hehe. Mitch "Byron Forbes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > No doubt, the likes of you will curse your own children with your > pathetic lifestyle as well - truely tragic. It will mean absolutely > nothing to be human on this planrt soon. >

Byron Forbes wrote:

Quoted text (12 lines)

> "Woodie83" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > >> Wow, that's some seriously twisted world, glad I don't live there. What >> is this second hand women thing you've made up? No one over fourteen >> years old? >> > > If there's nothing wrong with sex with a 2nd hand woman then there's > nothing wrong with anything now is there? The idea of it has always made me > want to vomit - I guess some have never tasted pride - pity. It is a genuine > tragedy that there are so many in the world that know no better.

Since you still haven't answered my question, there can be no response. What the F are you talking about? Never been kissed? Virgins only? No divorces or widows? No one currently married? What's wrong with a clean, one owner? Can I arrange a lease, I get bored after a couple of years. Don McCorkle

Byron Forbes wrote:

Quoted text (36 lines)

> "Woodie83" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > >>Byron Forbes wrote: >> >> >>> In my world - >>> >>> Priority #1 is avoiding the above. >>> Priority #2 is not having sex with a 2nd hand women. >>> Priority #3 is avoiding physical death >>> >>> Priorty #3 pales into insignificance compared to the other 2. No >>>point in physical life if one is spiritually dead! :) >> >>Wow, that's some seriously twisted world, glad I don't live there. What >>is this second hand women thing you've made up? No one over fourteen >>years old? >> > > > Yes, well the world is rome after all. I'm one of those that is entirely > uninterested in being a roman - I like to fly first class only which is, in > fact, a huge understatement. Maybe saying that I like my human existence to > mean something is a better way of puting it. > > If there's nothing wrong with sex with a 2nd hand woman then there's > nothing wrong with anything now is there? The idea of it has always made me > want to vomit - I guess some have never tasted pride - pity. It is a genuine > tragedy that there are so many in the world that know no better. > > No doubt, the likes of you will curse your own children with your > pathetic lifestyle as well - truely tragic. It will mean absolutely nothing > to be human on this planrt soon. > >

There's a new Carry On film being cast at the moment. You should try for it - it's call Carry On Wanking. As a stupid Aussie wanker, you should get the lead, no problem.

This is somehow OK? Or youre just a bitch with more time than sense? what a sad fuck..... ..|.. "Dave Henrie" <[email hidden]> >

Quoted text (45 lines)

> The first one I agree. > > The second one, I have no knowledge and don't understand why > homesexuality is bad to spread. Now..Aids..that is different. > From what read of Abu Graib..it was Iraqi men raping Iraqi > young men at the wink and nod of America. > > The third one...I don't see the connection. Bin Laden's beef was > with having Infidels stationed in the Holy Land(Saudi Arabia) And > having the Saudi Prince choose America to defend them instead of the > Mujahadeen(sp?) Other Wahabi terrorists have used our decadent lifestyle > as reason enough to destroy and kill. The al-qaida group was attacking > because we are the USA, not because we are USA Soldiers. While they did > strike directly at US military, (USS Cole, The Khobar Towers) they also > directed attacks at symbols of the US goverment, like the two embassies > in > Africa that were bombed and...one might argue...the two separate attacks > on > the Twin Towers. So a bad soldier is just as much a symbol of the > Goverment as a good soldier. To groups like Al Quaida, there is zero > difference. And most of these attacks took place against a Democratic > President, they do not care about our petty distinctions. It is the USA > they attack because we are the USA, not because a Republican President > is in power, or, as shown above, a Democratic one. > > I figure we will see several Murder trials resulting from the > Hadifa shootings. Already there have been officers that have been > releived of command.(a career death sentence if nothing else) The > actions of the 'bad' soldiers will be punished. I doubt though, that > the punishments of the Marines will sate the hatred of the military by > many. > > I work in an industry that is flooded with retired Vetrans, and they > span the gamut of good to bad. As with ANY group, beit Middle Eastern > Madrassa Teachers, Politicians, citizens, and even college educated > proffesionals, there will be evil in every group. Joining the Army does > not guarentee there are no bad apples, just as joining a political party > does not guarentee that all the elected officials will be motivated to > act in the best interests of their constituants. > > I will end this by declaring my support of the United States Soldier. > I do not hate them, I am not any more disgusted of their actions than I > am of any group. I marvel at the sacrifices they make on my behalf. > > dave henrie

This is somehow OK? Or youre just a *** with more time than sense? what a sad ***..... ..|..

What, more hypocrisy? Should I keep looking? Youre just mad because the attention isnt on you LOL. "Dave Henrie" spewed his hypocrite bullshit<[email hidden]> in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted text (44 lines)

> Marty_U <[email hidden]> wrote in news:447bb471@user-4jkyi8khqn.: > >> "Poll of troops in Iraq sees 72% support for withdrawal within a year. >> >> Seventy-two percent of troops on the ground in Iraq think U.S. military >> forces should get out of the country within a year, according to a Zogby >> poll released Tuesday." > > how nice. I'm sure when the Military is run as a democracy then the > results of such a poll would be relevant. Without knowing the internals > of > such a poll, the numbers are meaningless. I can site the record numbers > of > re-inlistments as just as valid or non-valid a number as the above poll. > > for example.. > Question: If the Iraqi Military/Police proved they could defend the > populace, would you want to leave > Iraq by the end of the year? > > for example: > Question: Since we all know there will be no victory in Iraq, do you want > to leave by year's end or wait til the politicians feel they have run out > of Grunts to kill? > > for example: > Question. Do you agree with President Bush's plan to reduce troop > strength > as the Iraqi Goverment proves it can defend it's people? If so, would you > hope this was possible by year's end? > > for example: > Question. If you knew the Iranian backed insurgents would have free reign > to murder possibly millions of Iraqis after a premature US pullout. would > you still want to leave by year's end? > > for example: > Question. If you knew this topic was out of the realm of this newsgroup > and you continued to post anyway, would you therefore expect everyone > else > to be just as frivolous with any rule and therefore our soldiers would be > completely justified in any action they took against any group? > > dave henrie

Yet another. Let me refresh your fucked up memory ok postman.... This is ok because YOU wrote it, right? Mitch ------------------------------------------------ NO! There are places to discus this tripe just as there are place for me to take a DUMP! People have asked both sides NICELY to stop. Since neither seems to want to listen I won't be nice. I DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR POLITICAL POSITIONS. I DON'T CARE IF YOU HAVE BEEN INSULTED OR MIS-INTERPRETED. GO SOMEWHERE ELSE. GO TO ALT.WATERCOOLER.PISSONTHEOTHERGUY. BUT DON'T COME HERE AND FILL UP THE NEWSGROUP WITH ANY MORE POLITICAL TALK. When folks ask you NICELY to stop and all the both of you do is rationalize why what YOU have to say is too important to be quiet...then you just don't have any consideration for the group. I'm guilty too, I added to this..but now I've seen my error and I'm stopping. AND SO THE FVCK SHOULD YOU YOU GO**AMN LITTLE FOURYEAROLDS!!!! Do I need to be any plainer? This is no different than some auto software guy flooding our newsgroup with pirated auto diagnostic software. It's wrong. If you don't know it...you should. "Dave Henrie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted text (16 lines)

> rex roland <[email hidden]> wrote in news:0R2fg.11985$cB3.3818 > @tornado.tampabay.rr.com: > >> >> YES! He was lying. Imagine, a democrat and a republican both wrong! The >> world is ending! How can there be more than 2 sides. My poor American >> brain can't handle that! > > > Then to what purpose would two leaders of different parties tell the same > lie? What benefit, what gain did each seek by telling the lie. > To say someone lied is far far FAR different than to say someone was > wrong. > > dave henrie >

"Mitch -A" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:e_sgg.37924$[email hidden]: > > This is somehow OK? Or youre just a bitch with more time than sense? > Check your email. THEN maybe you will understand. thankyou dave henrie

Got it, misunderstandings happen. Sorry for going off so quickly. Ignore the rest of em ok Dave ;) Back to the regularly scheduled programming... Mitch "Dave Henrie" <[email hidden]> > Check your email. THEN maybe you will understand. > thankyou > > dave henrie

Mitch -A wrote: > This is somehow OK? Or youre just a bitch with more time than sense? > > what a sad fuck..... Oh, very intelligent reply! <ROLLS EYES>

Quoted text (53 lines)

> > ..|.. > > "Dave Henrie" <[email hidden]> > > >>The first one I agree. >> >>The second one, I have no knowledge and don't understand why >>homesexuality is bad to spread. Now..Aids..that is different. >>From what read of Abu Graib..it was Iraqi men raping Iraqi >>young men at the wink and nod of America. >> >>The third one...I don't see the connection. Bin Laden's beef was >>with having Infidels stationed in the Holy Land(Saudi Arabia) And >>having the Saudi Prince choose America to defend them instead of the >>Mujahadeen(sp?) Other Wahabi terrorists have used our decadent lifestyle >>as reason enough to destroy and kill. The al-qaida group was attacking >>because we are the USA, not because we are USA Soldiers. While they did >>strike directly at US military, (USS Cole, The Khobar Towers) they also >>directed attacks at symbols of the US goverment, like the two embassies >>in >>Africa that were bombed and...one might argue...the two separate attacks >>on >>the Twin Towers. So a bad soldier is just as much a symbol of the >>Goverment as a good soldier. To groups like Al Quaida, there is zero >>difference. And most of these attacks took place against a Democratic >>President, they do not care about our petty distinctions. It is the USA >>they attack because we are the USA, not because a Republican President >>is in power, or, as shown above, a Democratic one. >> >> I figure we will see several Murder trials resulting from the >>Hadifa shootings. Already there have been officers that have been >>releived of command.(a career death sentence if nothing else) The >>actions of the 'bad' soldiers will be punished. I doubt though, that >>the punishments of the Marines will sate the hatred of the military by >>many. >> >> I work in an industry that is flooded with retired Vetrans, and they >>span the gamut of good to bad. As with ANY group, beit Middle Eastern >>Madrassa Teachers, Politicians, citizens, and even college educated >>proffesionals, there will be evil in every group. Joining the Army does >>not guarentee there are no bad apples, just as joining a political party >>does not guarentee that all the elected officials will be motivated to >>act in the best interests of their constituants. >> >> I will end this by declaring my support of the United States Soldier. >>I do not hate them, I am not any more disgusted of their actions than I >>am of any group. I marvel at the sacrifices they make on my behalf. >> >>dave henrie > > >

Mike Hunt <[email hidden]> wrote in news:erwgg.3272$Yi3.653@newsfe3- win.ntli.net: >> This is somehow OK? Or youre just a bitch with more time than sense? >> >> what a sad fuck..... > > Oh, very intelligent reply! <ROLLS EYES> >> Mike, Mitch was working with a scrambled time line. He saw my posts asking for this and all other political topics to end before he saw posts I had placed previously. But...this still doesn't solve anything. All we have been doing is insulting and defaming each other. Clearly this is not the purpose of this type of newsgroup. I admitted I participated...I have listened to those who wish this and other topics to cease. So That is what I will continue to maintain. Until we can shut these down. If anyone wishes, my spam filter is fairly easy to figure out. Please email me privately and I will attempt to clarify any point. I was blunt to the point of insult in the hopes of grabbing the attention of my fellow offenders. Hopefully we can all learn the value of silence. Byron, Mitch, Lance, DGF etc We are doing a disservice to this group. I value the input of all of you, but not when we are going ballistic at each other. dh

Brilliant retort mitch. I see that thinking is not your strong point. Best you stick to regurgitating your rediculous "party" line, seems that is all you are capable of. If you wanted people to pay any attention to you at all..... You should at least try to come across as a person capable of arguing his position as opposed to your infantile playground approach of name calling et al. Seek help. ======== "MitchA" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:dV6fg.104140$[email hidden]... > Take another hit you'll get over yourself eventually... > "Mitch -A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:e_sgg.37924$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (55 lines)

> > This is somehow OK? Or youre just a bitch with more time than sense? > > what a sad fuck..... > > ..|.. > > "Dave Henrie" <[email hidden]> > >> The first one I agree. >> >> The second one, I have no knowledge and don't understand why >> homesexuality is bad to spread. Now..Aids..that is different. >> From what read of Abu Graib..it was Iraqi men raping Iraqi >> young men at the wink and nod of America. >> >> The third one...I don't see the connection. Bin Laden's beef was >> with having Infidels stationed in the Holy Land(Saudi Arabia) And >> having the Saudi Prince choose America to defend them instead of the >> Mujahadeen(sp?) Other Wahabi terrorists have used our decadent lifestyle >> as reason enough to destroy and kill. The al-qaida group was attacking >> because we are the USA, not because we are USA Soldiers. While they did >> strike directly at US military, (USS Cole, The Khobar Towers) they also >> directed attacks at symbols of the US goverment, like the two embassies >> in >> Africa that were bombed and...one might argue...the two separate attacks >> on >> the Twin Towers. So a bad soldier is just as much a symbol of the >> Goverment as a good soldier. To groups like Al Quaida, there is zero >> difference. And most of these attacks took place against a Democratic >> President, they do not care about our petty distinctions. It is the USA >> they attack because we are the USA, not because a Republican President >> is in power, or, as shown above, a Democratic one. >> >> I figure we will see several Murder trials resulting from the >> Hadifa shootings. Already there have been officers that have been >> releived of command.(a career death sentence if nothing else) The >> actions of the 'bad' soldiers will be punished. I doubt though, that >> the punishments of the Marines will sate the hatred of the military by >> many. >> >> I work in an industry that is flooded with retired Vetrans, and they >> span the gamut of good to bad. As with ANY group, beit Middle Eastern >> Madrassa Teachers, Politicians, citizens, and even college educated >> proffesionals, there will be evil in every group. Joining the Army does >> not guarentee there are no bad apples, just as joining a political party >> does not guarentee that all the elected officials will be motivated to >> act in the best interests of their constituants. >> >> I will end this by declaring my support of the United States Soldier. >> I do not hate them, I am not any more disgusted of their actions than I >> am of any group. I marvel at the sacrifices they make on my behalf. >> >> dave henrie > >

I could really care less what you have to say. Not sure why you even bother (stalker tendencies perhaps).... Last post Ill see from you though, buh-bye loser ;) Don't you Canucks have your own internet to screw up? Why do you insist on stinking up OURS? Mitch -- "Don't pee on my leg then tell me it's raing". "==--==" <[email hidden]> spewed his nonsense one to many times

"Mike Hunt" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:v%Ufg.720$[email hidden]... >> > There's a new Carry On film being cast at the moment. You should try for > it - it's call Carry On Wanking. As a stupid Aussie wanker, you should get > the lead, no problem. Now that is pretty good! :) Too bad you're on the wrong side of the fence.