Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

Nascar 2002 Graphigs...

8 posts by 5 people · 14 Feb 2002 10:31 UTC - 14 Feb 2002 20:38 UTC

Pete 14 Feb 2002 10:31 UTC#136678
What i do wrong,i have test d3d and OpenGL, and all graf full,diffrent driver for my GF3...but still Nascar 4 looks better than Nascar 2002...? pete
Trapper 14 Feb 2002 12:40 UTC↳ reply to Pete#136602
I don't think so. I think it looks better, the AI is better and it gives me better Fps on my machine. Quite a bit of improvements all the way around compared to N4. Just my .02. "Petri Lindberg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:a4g3mh$jut$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (7 lines)> What i do wrong,i have test d3d and OpenGL, and all graf full,diffrent > driver for my GF3...but still Nascar 4 looks better than Nascar 2002...? > > > pete > >
Biz 14 Feb 2002 13:13 UTC↳ reply to Pete#136612
Might help if you list some of your hardware for possible clues to whats wrong. -- Biz "Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand alloys and compositions and,......things with molecular structures,....and the....." - Ash Petri Lindberg <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:a4g3mh$jut$[email hidden]... > What i do wrong,i have test d3d and OpenGL, and all graf full,diffrent > driver for my GF3...but still Nascar 4 looks better than Nascar 2002...? > > > pete > > >
Pete 14 Feb 2002 13:49 UTC↳ reply to Biz#136620
ok,i have: AMD 1600+ TB,512 mb,Gainward GF3 with just now driver 27.20 (but also test 21.83 and 32.11) Abit KT7A RAID,2 x 7200 46gb IBM deskstar,SB Audigy,Momo...and some thing else shit ;) pete "Biz" <[email hidden]> kirjoitti viestiss�:iKOa8.5947$[email hidden]... > Might help if you list some of your hardware for possible clues to whatswrong.
Quoted text (10 lines)> > -- > Biz > > "Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand > alloys and compositions and,......things with molecular structures,....and > the....." - Ash > > > Petri Lindberg <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:a4g3mh$jut$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (10 lines)> > What i do wrong,i have test d3d and OpenGL, and all graf full,diffrent > > driver for my GF3...but still Nascar 4 looks better than Nascar 2002...? > > > > > > pete > > > > > > > >
SimRacer 14 Feb 2002 17:53 UTC↳ reply to Pete#136578
Ok, got the specs, you left out the most important really. What OS are you running? I have a similar system to yours (same mobo, RAM and sound card) but have a lowly AMD 1.2 Ghz CPU and a Visiontek GF3. I use Win XP Pro, 23.11 vid drivers and get decent results in OpenGL at 1024X768 with FSAA 2x enabled. All looks great and I get over 50 FPS most places (online, in populated races, not alone in testing, those are 70+ FPS) Pete <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:a4gf46$ang$[email hidden]... > ok,i have: AMD 1600+ TB,512 mb,Gainward GF3 with just now driver 27.20(but
Quoted text (19 lines)> also test 21.83 and 32.11) Abit KT7A RAID,2 x 7200 46gb IBM deskstar,SB > Audigy,Momo...and some thing else shit ;) > > > > pete > > > > "Biz" <[email hidden]> kirjoitti > viestiss�:iKOa8.5947$[email hidden]... > > Might help if you list some of your hardware for possible clues to whats > wrong. > > > > -- > > Biz > > > > "Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand > > alloys and compositions and,......things with molecular
structures,....and
Quoted text (7 lines)> > the....." - Ash > > > > > > Petri Lindberg <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:a4g3mh$jut$[email hidden]... > > > What i do wrong,i have test d3d and OpenGL, and all graf full,diffrent > > > driver for my GF3...but still Nascar 4 looks better than Nascar
2002...?
Quoted text (10 lines)> > > > > > > > > pete > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
I have the same opinion. I'm running the demo and the full game on the same machine. AMD 1.2 Thunderbird, WinXP, GeForce2MX 400 32meg, 512meg ram, 21.83 driver (also tried 23.11), same graphics detail settings in D3D. The demo looks much better. The full game looks fuzzy. Tried OpenGL with same result, but better framerate. I tried the same testing on 2 other similar machines (one running Win98) with same result. I like the game, but I can't get rid of the fuzziness. "Petri Lindberg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:a4g3mh$jut$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (7 lines)> What i do wrong,i have test d3d and OpenGL, and all graf full,diffrent > driver for my GF3...but still Nascar 4 looks better than Nascar 2002...? > > > pete > >
Hmm.Thats interesting the full game and Demo look the same to me. "> driver (also tried 23.11), same graphics detail settings in D3D. The demo > looks much better. The full game looks fuzzy. > "Petri Lindberg"<[email hidden]> wrote in message >

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy