Archive / 2001 / December

Nascar 2002 Setups?

18 posts by 5 people · 30 Dec 2001 20:21 UTC - 01 Jan 2002 17:03 UTC

Thom j. 30 Dec 2001 20:21 UTC#144585

Does anyone know if we can use the same *.sim & *.acd setups in Nascar 2002 as in Nascar 4? Tia.. thom_j.

John Pancoast 30 Dec 2001 21:21 UTC↳ reply to Thom j.#144473

Yes, you can. I have been. -John Thom j. <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:SGKX7.339333$[email hidden]... > Does anyone know if we can use the same *.sim & *.acd > setups in Nascar 2002 as in Nascar 4? Tia.. thom_j. > > >

Thom j. 30 Dec 2001 21:39 UTC↳ reply to John Pancoast #144483

Great! Thanx John!! :) "John Pancoast" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted text (14 lines)

Larry (The Other Larry) 30 Dec 2001 21:56 UTC↳ reply to Thom j.#144494

They will load, but I've found them to be useless. I had to re-do them from scratch. My very good Atlanta setup for N4 was junk under N5. -Larry "Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:SGKX7.339333$[email hidden]... > Does anyone know if we can use the same *.sim & *.acd > setups in Nascar 2002 as in Nascar 4? Tia.. thom_j. > > >

John Pancoast 30 Dec 2001 23:15 UTC↳ reply to Larry (The Other Larry)#144391

Really? I found a 2-3 second improvement with them. Hard to say. -John Larry (The Other Larry) <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:34MX7.10696$[email hidden]... > They will load, but I've found them to be useless. I had to re-do themfrom

Quoted text (15 lines)

> scratch. > > My very good Atlanta setup for N4 was junk under N5. > > -Larry > > "Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:SGKX7.339333$[email hidden]... > > Does anyone know if we can use the same *.sim & *.acd > > setups in Nascar 2002 as in Nascar 4? Tia.. thom_j. > > > > > > > >

Thom j. 31 Dec 2001 03:17 UTC↳ reply to Larry (The Other Larry)#144361

Well then Larry, please give us yours.. pleaasssssssse :) "Larry (The Other Larry)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:34MX7.10696$[email hidden]... | They will load, but I've found them to be useless. I had to re-do themfrom

Quoted text (15 lines)

Larry (The Other Larry) 31 Dec 2001 15:57 UTC↳ reply to John Pancoast #144263

Mine was really bad. Good under N4, terrible under N5. -Larry "John Pancoast" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted text (26 lines)

> Really? I found a 2-3 second improvement with them. Hard to say. > > -John > > > Larry (The Other Larry) <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:34MX7.10696$[email hidden]... > > They will load, but I've found them to be useless. I had to re-do them > from > > scratch. > > > > My very good Atlanta setup for N4 was junk under N5. > > > > -Larry > > > > "Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:SGKX7.339333$[email hidden]... > > > Does anyone know if we can use the same *.sim & *.acd > > > setups in Nascar 2002 as in Nascar 4? Tia.. thom_j. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Larry (The Other Larry) 31 Dec 2001 15:59 UTC↳ reply to Thom j.#144264

I'm still working on it :) I'm searching for that 'fine line' between spinning out off the corners and a good exit that pulls the nose in from the wall. Not quite there yet :) This version of Atlanta really seems to factor in tire temps more than N4. It's very loose the first 3 laps, then tightens up slowly but constantly as the race goes on. Just as it should be, just more noticable to me under N5. That is not a bad thing. -Larry "Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:MMQX7.339727$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (23 lines)

> Well then Larry, please give us yours.. pleaasssssssse :) > > "Larry (The Other Larry)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:34MX7.10696$[email hidden]... > | They will load, but I've found them to be useless. I had to re-do them > from > | scratch. > | > | My very good Atlanta setup for N4 was junk under N5. > | > | -Larry > | > | "Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message > | news:SGKX7.339333$[email hidden]... > | > Does anyone know if we can use the same *.sim & *.acd > | > setups in Nascar 2002 as in Nascar 4? Tia.. thom_j. > | > > | > > | > > | > | > >

StP 31 Dec 2001 20:13 UTC↳ reply to Larry (The Other Larry)#144207

Does that mean that my junk N4 setups will be good in N5 ??? Steve paradise

Quoted text (11 lines)

> My very good Atlanta setup for N4 was junk under N5. > > -Larry > > "Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:SGKX7.339333$[email hidden]... > > Does anyone know if we can use the same *.sim & *.acd > > setups in Nascar 2002 as in Nascar 4? Tia.. thom_j. > > > > > >

Thom j. 31 Dec 2001 23:18 UTC↳ reply to Larry (The Other Larry)#144225

Yea I feel the push start around lap 10-11 but then when you try to compensate {or atleast for me} end up over'steering.. Then I start the TeeJay slide..:) Keep working & then send your setups to us all :) "Larry (The Other Larry)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:zX%X7.13039$[email hidden]... | I'm still working on it :) I'm searching for that 'fine line' between | spinning out off the corners and a good exit that pulls the nose in fromthe | wall. | | Not quite there yet :) | | This version of Atlanta really seems to factor in tire temps more than N4. | It's very loose the first 3 laps, then tightens up slowly but constantlyas | the race goes on. Just as it should be, just more noticable to me underN5.

Quoted text (11 lines)

them

Quoted text (20 lines)

| > from | > | scratch. | > | | > | My very good Atlanta setup for N4 was junk under N5. | > | | > | -Larry | > | | > | "Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message | > | news:SGKX7.339333$[email hidden]... | > | > Does anyone know if we can use the same *.sim & *.acd | > | > setups in Nascar 2002 as in Nascar 4? Tia.. thom_j. | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | | > | | > | > | |

Sean Higgins 01 Jan 2002 01:03 UTC↳ reply to StP #144237

LMAO!! -- Sean Higgins Redline Racing League www.rrlnrs.com My Ferrari pics http://home.sprintmail.com/~higgy/ "StP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > Does that mean that my junk N4 setups will be good in N5 ??? > Steve paradise > > > My very good Atlanta setup for N4 was junk under N5. > > > > -Larry > > > > "Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:SGKX7.339333$[email hidden]... > > > Does anyone know if we can use the same *.sim & *.acd > > > setups in Nascar 2002 as in Nascar 4? Tia.. thom_j. > > > > > > > > >

Sean Higgins 01 Jan 2002 01:04 UTC↳ reply to Larry (The Other Larry)#144238

I found them(N4 setups) to be 2-3 mph faster than the fast setup in the NR2002 Demo. My N4 setups feel good. With Atlanta I had to adjust a little bit to get the tightness out, but Richmond is good. I like the N4 feel, or maybe I'm just used to it. -- Sean Higgins Redline Racing League www.rrlnrs.com My Ferrari pics http://home.sprintmail.com/~higgy/ "Larry (The Other Larry)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:34MX7.10696$[email hidden]... > They will load, but I've found them to be useless. I had to re-do them from > scratch. > > My very good Atlanta setup for N4 was junk under N5. > > -Larry > > "Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:SGKX7.339333$[email hidden]... > > Does anyone know if we can use the same *.sim & *.acd > > setups in Nascar 2002 as in Nascar 4? Tia.. thom_j. > > > > > > > >

Larry (The Other Larry) 01 Jan 2002 04:13 UTC↳ reply to StP #144181

I don't think we really know for sure. All I know is that my Atlanta for N4 was un-useable in N5. Since the damage model, overheating, tire explosions, etc... are all disabled in the NR2002 demo, it's a bit difficult to tell what is what right now. -Larry "StP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted text (14 lines)

> Does that mean that my junk N4 setups will be good in N5 ??? > Steve paradise > > > My very good Atlanta setup for N4 was junk under N5. > > > > -Larry > > > > "Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:SGKX7.339333$[email hidden]... > > > Does anyone know if we can use the same *.sim & *.acd > > > setups in Nascar 2002 as in Nascar 4? Tia.. thom_j. > > > > > > > > >

Larry (The Other Larry) 01 Jan 2002 04:13 UTC↳ reply to Thom j.#144182

$19.95 :) -Larry "Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:xn6Y7.343250$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (15 lines)

> Yea I feel the push start around lap 10-11 but then when you try > to compensate {or atleast for me} end up over'steering.. Then I > start the TeeJay slide..:) Keep working & then send your setups > to us all :) > > "Larry (The Other Larry)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:zX%X7.13039$[email hidden]... > | I'm still working on it :) I'm searching for that 'fine line' between > | spinning out off the corners and a good exit that pulls the nose in from > the > | wall. > | > | Not quite there yet :) > | > | This version of Atlanta really seems to factor in tire temps more than

N4.

Quoted text (38 lines)

> | It's very loose the first 3 laps, then tightens up slowly but constantly > as > | the race goes on. Just as it should be, just more noticable to me under > N5. > | That is not a bad thing. > | > | -Larry > | > | "Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message > | news:MMQX7.339727$[email hidden]... > | > Well then Larry, please give us yours.. pleaasssssssse :) > | > > | > "Larry (The Other Larry)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > | > news:34MX7.10696$[email hidden]... > | > | They will load, but I've found them to be useless. I had to re-do > them > | > from > | > | scratch. > | > | > | > | My very good Atlanta setup for N4 was junk under N5. > | > | > | > | -Larry > | > | > | > | "Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message > | > | news:SGKX7.339333$[email hidden]... > | > | > Does anyone know if we can use the same *.sim & *.acd > | > | > setups in Nascar 2002 as in Nascar 4? Tia.. thom_j. > | > | > > | > | > > | > | > > | > | > | > | > | > > | > > | > | > >

Thom j. 01 Jan 2002 06:07 UTC↳ reply to Larry (The Other Larry)#144123

Gee Larry you made a mistake with your decimal. its $1.99_5 :) "Larry (The Other Larry)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:aIaY7.15427$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (15 lines)

| $19.95 :) | | -Larry | | "Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message | news:xn6Y7.343250$[email hidden]... | > Yea I feel the push start around lap 10-11 but then when you try | > to compensate {or atleast for me} end up over'steering.. Then I | > start the TeeJay slide..:) Keep working & then send your setups | > to us all :) | > | > "Larry (The Other Larry)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message | > news:zX%X7.13039$[email hidden]... | > | I'm still working on it :) I'm searching for that 'fine line' between | > | spinning out off the corners and a good exit that pulls the nose in

from

Quoted text (8 lines)

| > the | > | wall. | > | | > | Not quite there yet :) | > | | > | This version of Atlanta really seems to factor in tire temps more than | N4. | > | It's very loose the first 3 laps, then tightens up slowly but

constantly | > as | > | the race goes on. Just as it should be, just more noticable to meunder

Quoted text (37 lines)

| > N5. | > | That is not a bad thing. | > | | > | -Larry | > | | > | "Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message | > | news:MMQX7.339727$[email hidden]... | > | > Well then Larry, please give us yours.. pleaasssssssse :) | > | > | > | > "Larry (The Other Larry)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message | > | > news:34MX7.10696$[email hidden]... | > | > | They will load, but I've found them to be useless. I had to re-do | > them | > | > from | > | > | scratch. | > | > | | > | > | My very good Atlanta setup for N4 was junk under N5. | > | > | | > | > | -Larry | > | > | | > | > | "Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message | > | > | news:SGKX7.339333$[email hidden]... | > | > | > Does anyone know if we can use the same *.sim & *.acd | > | > | > setups in Nascar 2002 as in Nascar 4? Tia.. thom_j. | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | | > | > | | > | > | > | > | > | | > | | > | > | |

Thom j. 01 Jan 2002 06:10 UTC↳ reply to Sean Higgins #144125

Just Curious Sean, Are you breaking the average of 180mph around Atlanta? "Sean Higgins" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:rW7Y7.2328$4d5.15867@rwcrnsc54...

Quoted text (34 lines)

Larry (The Other Larry) 01 Jan 2002 16:59 UTC↳ reply to Thom j.#144006

You're Right! But you moved it in the wrong direction :) -Larry "Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:NmcY7.344533$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (18 lines)

> Gee Larry you made a mistake with your decimal. its $1.99_5 :) > > "Larry (The Other Larry)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:aIaY7.15427$[email hidden]... > | $19.95 :) > | > | -Larry > | > | "Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message > | news:xn6Y7.343250$[email hidden]... > | > Yea I feel the push start around lap 10-11 but then when you try > | > to compensate {or atleast for me} end up over'steering.. Then I > | > start the TeeJay slide..:) Keep working & then send your setups > | > to us all :) > | > > | > "Larry (The Other Larry)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > | > news:zX%X7.13039$[email hidden]... > | > | I'm still working on it :) I'm searching for that 'fine line'

between

Quoted text (8 lines)

> | > | spinning out off the corners and a good exit that pulls the nose in > from > | > the > | > | wall. > | > | > | > | Not quite there yet :) > | > | > | > | This version of Atlanta really seems to factor in tire temps more

than

Quoted text (18 lines)

> | N4. > | > | It's very loose the first 3 laps, then tightens up slowly but > constantly > | > as > | > | the race goes on. Just as it should be, just more noticable to me > under > | > N5. > | > | That is not a bad thing. > | > | > | > | -Larry > | > | > | > | "Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message > | > | news:MMQX7.339727$[email hidden]... > | > | > Well then Larry, please give us yours.. pleaasssssssse :) > | > | > > | > | > "Larry (The Other Larry)" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > | > | > news:34MX7.10696$[email hidden]... > | > | > | They will load, but I've found them to be useless. I had to

re-do

Quoted text (27 lines)

> | > them > | > | > from > | > | > | scratch. > | > | > | > | > | > | My very good Atlanta setup for N4 was junk under N5. > | > | > | > | > | > | -Larry > | > | > | > | > | > | "Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message > | > | > | news:SGKX7.339333$[email hidden]... > | > | > | > Does anyone know if we can use the same *.sim & *.acd > | > | > | > setups in Nascar 2002 as in Nascar 4? Tia.. thom_j. > | > | > | > > | > | > | > > | > | > | > > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > | > > | > | > > | > | > | > | > | > > | > > | > | > >

Larry (The Other Larry) 01 Jan 2002 17:03 UTC↳ reply to Thom j.#144008

The setup I'm working on, in it's current form, is good for a top lap of 185.8 (only hit it once). Consistent laps will result in 184's until the tires start to wear, and then drop to 182's-183's. . Once the tires wear out, it drops to 181's or so. Lap times drop to zero if you push it too far :) I have no idea if this is good or not. I'm not an Atlanta master :) -Larry "Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:ipcY7.344557$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (8 lines)

> Just Curious Sean, Are you breaking the average > of 180mph around Atlanta? > > "Sean Higgins" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:rW7Y7.2328$4d5.15867@rwcrnsc54... > | I found them(N4 setups) to be 2-3 mph faster than the fast setup in the > | NR2002 Demo. My N4 setups feel good. With Atlanta I had to adjust a > | little bit to get the tightness out, but Richmond is good. I like the

Quoted text (13 lines)

them

Quoted text (20 lines)

> | from > | > scratch. > | > > | > My very good Atlanta setup for N4 was junk under N5. > | > > | > -Larry > | > > | > "Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message > | > news:SGKX7.339333$[email hidden]... > | > > Does anyone know if we can use the same *.sim & *.acd > | > > setups in Nascar 2002 as in Nascar 4? Tia.. thom_j. > | > > > | > > > | > > > | > > | > > | > | > >

Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

Nascar 2002 Setups?

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

News

Articles

Database

Guides