Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

GPL 107%

9 posts by 7 people · 20 Oct 2001 16:39 UTC - 26 Oct 2001 20:34 UTC

Nicholas J Ball 20 Oct 2001 16:39 UTC#157034
Hi there, just thought I would announce that I have finally got under 107% on all circuits now :-) The last few days I have been trying to get my Nurb time into the 107% but just couldn't do it. I seemed to be stuck at 9:14. But I stuck with it, and went through all the chassis, picking the slowest PB and running that chassis until I improved it, then picking on the next worst etc. My last 4 runs were:- Brabham - 9:07.116 Lotus - 9:06.060 BRM - 9:00.080 Eagle - 8:56.778 My next target is the Cooper then the Honda and finally the Ferrari. Sorry to post this but I am just soo happy :-))))))) All the very best, Nik http://www.balldesi.demon.co.uk/
Congrats! You da man today! J. Janasov "Nicholas J Ball" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > Hi there, just thought I would announce that I have finally got under 107% > on all circuits now :-) > > The last few days I have been trying to get my Nurb time into the 107% but > just couldn't do it. I seemed to be stuck at 9:14. But I stuck with it,and > went through all the chassis, picking the slowest PB and running that > chassis until I improved it, then picking on the next worst etc. My last4
Quoted text (18 lines)> runs were:- > > Brabham - 9:07.116 > Lotus - 9:06.060 > BRM - 9:00.080 > Eagle - 8:56.778 > > My next target is the Cooper then the Honda and finally the Ferrari. > > Sorry to post this but I am just soo happy :-))))))) > > All the very best, > > Nik > > http://www.balldesi.demon.co.uk/ > >
Excellent work Nik! GPL will eat your soul, but it's sooo fun, aint it? :-) -- "Racing! - Science for the action minded." mark "Nicholas J Ball" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > Hi there, just thought I would announce that I have finally got under 107% > on all circuits now :-) > > The last few days I have been trying to get my Nurb time into the 107% but > just couldn't do it. I seemed to be stuck at 9:14. But I stuck with it, and > went through all the chassis, picking the slowest PB and running that > chassis until I improved it, then picking on the next worst etc. My last 4 > runs were:- > > Brabham - 9:07.116 > Lotus - 9:06.060 > BRM - 9:00.080 > Eagle - 8:56.778 > > My next target is the Cooper then the Honda and finally the Ferrari. > > Sorry to post this but I am just soo happy :-))))))) > > All the very best, > > Nik > > http://www.balldesi.demon.co.uk/ > >
Nice one, Nick! ;-) I'm in EXACTLY the same position you were, trying to make 107% on all tracks, with only the 'Ring to go. Stuck at 08:58.60 in the Ferrari at the mo...I'm sure I can do better in the Eagle soon though (he said hopefully!) Jonesy GPLRANK (F1): +65.95 "Nicholas J Ball" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted text (23 lines)> Hi there, just thought I would announce that I have finally got under 107% > on all circuits now :-) > > The last few days I have been trying to get my Nurb time into the 107% but > just couldn't do it. I seemed to be stuck at 9:14. But I stuck with it, and > went through all the chassis, picking the slowest PB and running that > chassis until I improved it, then picking on the next worst etc. My last 4 > runs were:- > > Brabham - 9:07.116 > Lotus - 9:06.060 > BRM - 9:00.080 > Eagle - 8:56.778 > > My next target is the Cooper then the Honda and finally the Ferrari. > > Sorry to post this but I am just soo happy :-))))))) > > All the very best, > > Nik > > http://www.balldesi.demon.co.uk/
I have now got down to 8:42.179 in the Ferrari with the Lotus and Honda not far behind. I have to go back to the others and get them down from around 9:00 to under 8:45. BTW my Eagle time is 8:56.778 at the moment, but I hope to get it down this week. I have not been on any other track for 5 days now. I can almost imagine a lap! Jonesy, if you want me to send you my Eagle setup and replay file, jst let me know. Thanks for all the comments people. Nik Ball GPL Rank 44.62 :-) Monster Rank 555.07 :-))) http://www.balldesi.demon.co.uk/ "Jonesy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (11 lines)> Nice one, Nick! ;-) > > I'm in EXACTLY the same position you were, trying to make 107% on all > tracks, with only the 'Ring to go. > > Stuck at 08:58.60 in the Ferrari at the mo...I'm sure I can do better > in the Eagle soon though (he said hopefully!) > > Jonesy > > GPLRANK (F1): +65.95
EldredP 25 Oct 2001 15:00 UTC↳ reply to Jonesy#156144
In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] (Jonesy) writes:
Quoted text (8 lines)>Nice one, Nick! ;-) > >I'm in EXACTLY the same position you were, trying to make 107% on all >tracks, with only the 'Ring to go. > >Stuck at 08:58.60 in the Ferrari at the mo...I'm sure I can do better >in the Eagle soon though (he said hopefully!) >
Do you think it's better to start with the highest, or with the one most likely to beat whatever benchmark you've set? Meaning would you try to get your N-ring 109% time below your Rouen 108%, or would you try to get your Silverstone 101% down to 99%? Eldred -- Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001 Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett GPLRank - under construction... Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you with experience... Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
Biz 26 Oct 2001 05:12 UTC↳ reply to EldredP#156079
Obviously its whatever you want, but I usually try to work on the worst offender. 1> It offers the greatest possiblity of rank improvement. 2. Gotta do it sometime.... -- Biz "Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand alloys and compositions and,......things with molecular structures,....and the....." - Ash EldredP <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > In article <[email hidden]>, > [email hidden] (Jonesy) writes: > > >Nice one, Nick! ;-) > > > >I'm in EXACTLY the same position you were, trying to make 107% on all > >tracks, with only the 'Ring to go. > > > >Stuck at 08:58.60 in the Ferrari at the mo...I'm sure I can do better > >in the Eagle soon though (he said hopefully!) > > > > Do you think it's better to start with the highest, or with the one most likely > to beat whatever benchmark you've set? Meaning would you try to get your > N-ring 109% time below your Rouen 108%, or would you try to get your > Silverstone 101% down to 99%? > > Eldred > -- > Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001 > Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett > GPLRank - under construction... > > Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you > with experience... > Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
EldredP 26 Oct 2001 16:55 UTC↳ reply to Biz#156024
In article <Lg6C7.84229$[email hidden]>, "Biz" <[email hidden]> writes: >Obviously its whatever you want, but I usually try to work on the worst >offender. > >1> It offers the greatest possiblity of rank improvement. >2. Gotta do it sometime.... > I was just wondering how much reaching a goal helps. Meaning, does going -ve on a track or under 107% give a better sense of accomplishment than simply lowering one track's %age lower than another.<g> Eldred -- Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001 Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett GPLRank - under construction... Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you with experience... Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
EldredP <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (13 lines)> In article <Lg6C7.84229$[email hidden]>, "Biz" > <[email hidden]> writes: > > >Obviously its whatever you want, but I usually try to work on the worst > >offender. > > > >1> It offers the greatest possiblity of rank improvement. > >2. Gotta do it sometime.... > > > > I was just wondering how much reaching a goal helps. Meaning, does going -ve > on a track or under 107% give a better sense of accomplishment than simply > lowering one track's %age lower than another.<g>
My best results seemed to come from an organised sequence of tracks, from Kyalami to Zandvoort (or the other way, for variety ;-). I'd have a session at a track, play with setups (which for me is much of the fun) and see what I could do - and if I didn't improve, I'd shrug, have a break then move on to the next track. Variety (tracks, cars, sims, whatever) seems to be of huge benefit; the other thing is that this approach means you can't put off the tracks you hate (I still dislike Mosport, but I've got some reasonable times at it). Over-focusing on one track *doesn't* seem to help, for me. Jonny

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy