Hi there, just thought I would announce that I have finally got under 107%
on all circuits now :-)
The last few days I have been trying to get my Nurb time into the 107% but
just couldn't do it. I seemed to be stuck at 9:14. But I stuck with it, and
went through all the chassis, picking the slowest PB and running that
chassis until I improved it, then picking on the next worst etc. My last 4
runs were:-
Brabham - 9:07.116
Lotus - 9:06.060
BRM - 9:00.080
Eagle - 8:56.778
My next target is the Cooper then the Honda and finally the Ferrari.
Sorry to post this but I am just soo happy :-)))))))
All the very best,
Nik
http://www.balldesi.demon.co.uk/
Congrats! You da man today!
J. Janasov
"Nicholas J Ball" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> Hi there, just thought I would announce that I have finally got under 107%
> on all circuits now :-)
>
> The last few days I have been trying to get my Nurb time into the 107% but
> just couldn't do it. I seemed to be stuck at 9:14. But I stuck with it,and
> went through all the chassis, picking the slowest PB and running that
> chassis until I improved it, then picking on the next worst etc. My last4
Quoted text (18 lines)
> runs were:- > > Brabham - 9:07.116 > Lotus - 9:06.060 > BRM - 9:00.080 > Eagle - 8:56.778 > > My next target is the Cooper then the Honda and finally the Ferrari. > > Sorry to post this but I am just soo happy :-))))))) > > All the very best, > > Nik > > http://www.balldesi.demon.co.uk/ > >Excellent work Nik! GPL will eat your soul, but it's sooo fun, aint it? :-)
--
"Racing! - Science for the action minded."
mark
"Nicholas J Ball" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> Hi there, just thought I would announce that I have finally got under 107%
> on all circuits now :-)
>
> The last few days I have been trying to get my Nurb time into the 107% but
> just couldn't do it. I seemed to be stuck at 9:14. But I stuck with it,
and
> went through all the chassis, picking the slowest PB and running that
> chassis until I improved it, then picking on the next worst etc. My last
4
> runs were:-
>
> Brabham - 9:07.116
> Lotus - 9:06.060
> BRM - 9:00.080
> Eagle - 8:56.778
>
> My next target is the Cooper then the Honda and finally the Ferrari.
>
> Sorry to post this but I am just soo happy :-)))))))
>
> All the very best,
>
> Nik
>
> http://www.balldesi.demon.co.uk/
>
>
Nice one, Nick! ;-)
I'm in EXACTLY the same position you were, trying to make 107% on all
tracks, with only the 'Ring to go.
Stuck at 08:58.60 in the Ferrari at the mo...I'm sure I can do better
in the Eagle soon though (he said hopefully!)
Jonesy
GPLRANK (F1): +65.95
"Nicholas J Ball" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted text (23 lines)
> Hi there, just thought I would announce that I have finally got under 107% > on all circuits now :-) > > The last few days I have been trying to get my Nurb time into the 107% but > just couldn't do it. I seemed to be stuck at 9:14. But I stuck with it, and > went through all the chassis, picking the slowest PB and running that > chassis until I improved it, then picking on the next worst etc. My last 4 > runs were:- > > Brabham - 9:07.116 > Lotus - 9:06.060 > BRM - 9:00.080 > Eagle - 8:56.778 > > My next target is the Cooper then the Honda and finally the Ferrari. > > Sorry to post this but I am just soo happy :-))))))) > > All the very best, > > Nik > > http://www.balldesi.demon.co.uk/I have now got down to 8:42.179 in the Ferrari with the Lotus and Honda not
far behind. I have to go back to the others and get them down from around
9:00 to under 8:45.
BTW my Eagle time is 8:56.778 at the moment, but I hope to get it down this
week. I have not been on any other track for 5 days now. I can almost
imagine a lap!
Jonesy, if you want me to send you my Eagle setup and replay file, jst let
me know.
Thanks for all the comments people.
Nik Ball
GPL Rank 44.62 :-)
Monster Rank 555.07 :-)))
http://www.balldesi.demon.co.uk/
"Jonesy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (11 lines)
> Nice one, Nick! ;-) > > I'm in EXACTLY the same position you were, trying to make 107% on all > tracks, with only the 'Ring to go. > > Stuck at 08:58.60 in the Ferrari at the mo...I'm sure I can do better > in the Eagle soon though (he said hopefully!) > > Jonesy > > GPLRANK (F1): +65.95In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] (Jonesy) writes:
Do you think it's better to start with the highest, or with the one most likely
to beat whatever benchmark you've set? Meaning would you try to get your
N-ring 109% time below your Rouen 108%, or would you try to get your
Silverstone 101% down to 99%?
Eldred
--
Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPLRank - under construction...
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
Quoted text (8 lines)
>Nice one, Nick! ;-) > >I'm in EXACTLY the same position you were, trying to make 107% on all >tracks, with only the 'Ring to go. > >Stuck at 08:58.60 in the Ferrari at the mo...I'm sure I can do better >in the Eagle soon though (he said hopefully!) >Obviously its whatever you want, but I usually try to work on the worst
offender.
1> It offers the greatest possiblity of rank improvement.
2. Gotta do it sometime....
--
Biz
"Don't touch that please, your primitive intellect wouldn't understand
alloys and compositions and,......things with molecular structures,....and
the....." - Ash
EldredP <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> In article <[email hidden]>,
> [email hidden] (Jonesy) writes:
>
> >Nice one, Nick! ;-)
> >
> >I'm in EXACTLY the same position you were, trying to make 107% on all
> >tracks, with only the 'Ring to go.
> >
> >Stuck at 08:58.60 in the Ferrari at the mo...I'm sure I can do better
> >in the Eagle soon though (he said hopefully!)
> >
>
> Do you think it's better to start with the highest, or with the one most
likely
> to beat whatever benchmark you've set? Meaning would you try to get your
> N-ring 109% time below your Rouen 108%, or would you try to get your
> Silverstone 101% down to 99%?
>
> Eldred
> --
> Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001
> Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
> GPLRank - under construction...
>
> Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats
you
> with experience...
> Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
In article <Lg6C7.84229$[email hidden]>, "Biz"
<[email hidden]> writes:
>Obviously its whatever you want, but I usually try to work on the worst
>offender.
>
>1> It offers the greatest possiblity of rank improvement.
>2. Gotta do it sometime....
>
I was just wondering how much reaching a goal helps. Meaning, does going -ve
on a track or under 107% give a better sense of accomplishment than simply
lowering one track's %age lower than another.<g>
Eldred
--
Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPLRank - under construction...
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
EldredP <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
My best results seemed to come from an organised sequence of
tracks, from Kyalami to Zandvoort (or the other way, for
variety ;-).
I'd have a session at a track, play with setups (which for me
is much of the fun) and see what I could do - and if I didn't
improve, I'd shrug, have a break then move on to the next
track.
Variety (tracks, cars, sims, whatever) seems to be of huge
benefit; the other thing is that this approach means you
can't put off the tracks you hate (I still dislike Mosport,
but I've got some reasonable times at it).
Over-focusing on one track *doesn't* seem to help, for me.
Jonny


































