Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

GPL New version of bandwidth patch

5 posts by 3 people · 26 Aug 2001 21:52 UTC - 29 Aug 2001 21:23 UTC

Bart Westra 26 Aug 2001 21:52 UTC#165441
Hi I have made a new version of the GPL bandwidth patch. Enhancements are: * Support for GPL 1.2.0.2 (Cpu fix) * Morecars patch and cars behind patch combined in one program * Program can undo and redo the patches, and show which patches are present * Added two examples to show the effect the patch can have If you have the current version of the patch working (more cars patch and/or cars behind patch), there is no need to re-apply as the patch code itself has not changed. The new program will show the presence of the old patches. You find the patch here: http://www.xs4all.nl/~westrab/gpl.htm#bw Bart Westra
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001 23:52:59 +0200, "Bart Westra" <[email hidden]> wrote: >Hi > >I have made a new version of the GPL bandwidth patch. Enhancements are: Right on!! Andre
I am a few days late on this re: question but does this patch have a positive affect if you have CPUs lower then the 1.3-1.4gig type? Since I'm only running a P3 1ghz o/c @ 1.22ghz is there any real benefit for me to use this patch? Tia. Thom_j. "Bart Westra" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:9mbr7u$7sk$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (7 lines)| Hi | | I have made a new version of the GPL bandwidth patch. Enhancements are: | | * Support for GPL 1.2.0.2 (Cpu fix) | * Morecars patch and cars behind patch combined in one program | * Program can undo and redo the patches, and show which patches are
present | * Added two examples to show the effect the patch can have | | If you have the current version of the patch working (more cars patchand/or | cars behind patch), there is no need to re-apply as the patch code itself | has not changed. The new program will show the presence of the oldpatches.
Quoted text (8 lines)| | You find the patch here: http://www.xs4all.nl/~westrab/gpl.htm#bw | | Bart Westra | | | |
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.273 / Virus Database: 143 - Release Date: 8/16/2001
"Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:LP4j7.149383$[email hidden]... > I am a few days late on this re: question but does this patch have > a positive affect if you have CPUs lower then the 1.3-1.4gig type? > Since I'm only running a P3 1ghz o/c @ 1.22ghz is there any real > benefit for me to use this patch? Tia. Thom_j. The papy cpu fix prevents errors with the pace at which GPL runs in >1.4G cpu's. The error is caused by an integer overflowing and the solution in the cpu fix is to enlarge (probably double) this integer. (Sorry Randy if I am over-simplifying here.) On <1.4G cpu's the integer does not overflow and it still won't when you apply the cpu fix. The performance overhead of the enlarged integer is neglectible so you may consider the fix neutral. I had to update the bandwidth patches because the cpu fix moved some code within GPL and changed some addresses. For pre-cpu fix gpl the bandwidth patches have not changed at all. However the patch program is now a bit more user friendly, it can show patch status and undo/redo the patches. Also because of this it no longer makes backup copies of gpl.exe (abundant checks are built in that must be passed before gpl.exe is actually changed). The benefit of the bandwidth patch is that less cars will seem to spring from nowhere in online races. Bart Westra
Ok Bart thank you.. I think I get the basic idea.. For now I'll just stay without the patch.. Again Thanx.. -Thom_j. "Bart Westra" wrote: | The papy cpu fix prevents errors with the pace at which GPL runs in >1.4G | cpu's. The error is caused by an integer overflowing and the solution inthe
Quoted text (9 lines)| cpu fix is to enlarge (probably double) this integer. (Sorry Randy if I am | over-simplifying here.) | On <1.4G cpu's the integer does not overflow and it still won't when you | apply the cpu fix. The performance overhead of the enlarged integer is | neglectible so you may consider the fix neutral. | | I had to update the bandwidth patches because the cpu fix moved some code | within GPL and changed some addresses. For pre-cpu fix gpl the bandwidth | patches have not changed at all. However the patch program is now a bit
more | user friendly, it can show patch status and undo/redo the patches. Also | because of this it no longer makes backup copies of gpl.exe (abundantchecks
Quoted text (12 lines)| are built in that must be passed before gpl.exe is actually changed). | The benefit of the bandwidth patch is that less cars will seem to spring | from nowhere in online races. | | Bart Westra | | "Thom j." <[email hidden]> wrote in message | news:LP4j7.149383$[email hidden]... | > I am a few days late on this re: question but does this patch have | > a positive affect if you have CPUs lower then the 1.3-1.4gig type? | > Since I'm only running a P3 1ghz o/c @ 1.22ghz is there any real | > benefit for me to use this patch? Tia. Thom_j.
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.273 / Virus Database: 143 - Release Date: 8/16/2001

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy