Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

FAQ REQ - Is it needed?

7 posts by 5 people · 09 Jul 2001 23:58 UTC - 13 Jul 2001 02:03 UTC

Book 09 Jul 2001 23:58 UTC#174325
Just noticing all the repeat questions that are appearing of late. Does this NG require a FAQ? Does someone want to take a step forward and do it? Book PS - Why is everyone taking one step BACK!
ymenard 11 Jul 2001 21:13 UTC↳ reply to Book#173920
>"Book" <[email hidden]> wrote > Just noticing all the repeat questions that are appearing of late. Does > this NG require a FAQ? No. -- -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> -- May the Downforce be with you... -- http://www.ymenard.com/ -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimato Dominguez Corporation - helping America into the New World...
Well, a lot of the same physics questions keep coming around, maybe someone could compile these, save some typing in the future? I'll volunteer to write the shameless plug -- check sae.org for our book and other references (not Amazon). Does anyone have a server that could be set up to post a FAQ at weekly intervals (or whatever)? -- Doug Milliken Milliken Research Associates Inc. On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, ymenard wrote: > >"Book" <[email hidden]> wrote > > Just noticing all the repeat questions that are appearing of late. Does > > this NG require a FAQ? > > No.
Doug, We could probably do that at The Pits. http://www.theuspits.com -- Scott B. Husted ICQ# 4395450 http://www.Husted.cc "Doug Milliken" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > > Well, a lot of the same physics questions keep coming around, > maybe someone could compile these, save some typing in the future? > > I'll volunteer to write the shameless plug -- check sae.org for our > book and other references (not Amazon). > > Does anyone have a server that could be set up to post a FAQ at weekly > intervals (or whatever)? > > -- Doug Milliken > Milliken Research Associates Inc. > > On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, ymenard wrote: > > > >"Book" <[email hidden]> wrote > > > Just noticing all the repeat questions that are appearing of late. Does > > > this NG require a FAQ? > > > > No. >
>"Doug Milliken" <[email hidden]> wrote > Well, a lot of the same physics questions keep coming around, > maybe someone could compile these, save some typing in the future? Well we actually had a FAQ here for a long time, for multiple titles even. At this current evolution of the Usenet, it's more and more impossible to have a FAQ that answers the most common question, because the general interest of the Usenet by a single person searching for an answer is very sparse. So most of them won't read the FAQ. The people left are people with enough interest in the community to stick here a while, read what others have to say and find the answers themselves. Since most of the people DO answer questions, it means that they really don't need a FAQ and they will answers each and every question. It makes it much more personal than just saying "Read the FAQ" ;) -- -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> -- May the Downforce be with you... -- http://www.ymenard.com/ -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimato Dominguez Corporation - helping America into the New World...
Well, I don't think having a "physics" FAQ is a bad idea. We already have a small section on physics at The Pits (Physics of Racing Series FAQ). -- Scott B. Husted PA-Scott ICQ#4395450 ymenard <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:j5937.25817$[email hidden]... > >"Doug Milliken" <[email hidden]> wrote > > Well, a lot of the same physics questions keep coming around, > > maybe someone could compile these, save some typing in the future? > > > Well we actually had a FAQ here for a long time, for multiple titles even. > At this current evolution of the Usenet, it's more and more impossible to > have a FAQ that answers the most common question, because the general > interest of the Usenet by a single person searching for an answer is very > sparse. So most of them won't read the FAQ. > > The people left are people with enough interest in the community to stick > here a while, read what others have to say and find the answers themselves. > > Since most of the people DO answer questions, it means that they really > don't need a FAQ and they will answers each and every question. It makes it > much more personal than just saying "Read the FAQ" ;) > > > > -- > -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> > -- May the Downforce be with you... > -- http://www.ymenard.com/ > -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimato Dominguez > Corporation - helping America into the New World... > > >
"Scott B. Husted" <[email hidden]> wrote: >Doug, > >We could probably do that at The Pits. > >http://www.theuspits.com That would be great--I've been wanting a FAQ for some time now. I have tried finding answers to (what have turned out to be common) SCGT questions by web searching but rarely have much luck. And when asking on boards, the answers I have received have not always been, uh, definitve. --Morton Correct email: telson @ ameritech.net

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy