Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

EA - Wierd Strategy

5 posts by 5 people · 24 Mar 2001 14:09 UTC - 28 Mar 2001 19:53 UTC

Douglas Ellison 24 Mar 2001 14:09 UTC#194183
OK - Superbike 2001 has the most amazing graphics, even on a modest system. F12000 & F1CS2000 don't look as good, and require better faster hardware. They are ALL published by EA Why the HELL doesn't EA use the Superbike 2001 graphics engine in their F1 lineup?? Doug
we just covered that recently. Superbike is version of NFS: PU and F12k/cs2k are based on SCGT. Two different teams of developers, two different results. Even tho EA has the rights to each, I don't think they can take one developers code and give it to another... (I could be wrong about that tho..){Lord knows I have been before...} :) dave henrie "Douglas Ellison" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:NS1v6.35087$[email hidden]... > OK - Superbike 2001 has the most amazing graphics, even on a modestsystem.
Quoted text (13 lines)> > F12000 & F1CS2000 don't look as good, and require better faster hardware. > > They are ALL published by EA > > Why the HELL doesn't EA use the Superbike 2001 graphics engine in their F1 > lineup?? > > > Doug > > >
In article <NS1v6.35087$[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...
Quoted text (10 lines)> OK - Superbike 2001 has the most amazing graphics, even on a modest system. > > F12000 & F1CS2000 don't look as good, and require better faster hardware. > > They are ALL published by EA > > Why the HELL doesn't EA use the Superbike 2001 graphics engine in their F1 > lineup?? > >
The simple answer is that Electronic Arts is a *publisher*. The games they sell are developed by programing shops that are their own entities. The guys that wrote SB2001 was a completely different company that has EA publish their stuff. A parallel is Sierra. They *publish* racing sims developed by Papyrus.
"Douglas Ellison" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:NS1v6.35087$[email hidden]... > OK - Superbike 2001 has the most amazing graphics, even on a modestsystem.
Quoted text (11 lines)> > F12000 & F1CS2000 don't look as good, and require better faster hardware. > > They are ALL published by EA > > Why the HELL doesn't EA use the Superbike 2001 graphics engine in their F1 > lineup?? > > > Doug >
Because they will get their products sold anyway and can do another update next year with a decent engine. Sjoerd
I think because it is developed by two different developers. "Douglas Ellison" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht news:NS1v6.35087$[email hidden]... > OK - Superbike 2001 has the most amazing graphics, even on a modestsystem.
Quoted text (13 lines)> > F12000 & F1CS2000 don't look as good, and require better faster hardware. > > They are ALL published by EA > > Why the HELL doesn't EA use the Superbike 2001 graphics engine in their F1 > lineup?? > > > Doug > > >

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy