Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

F1 CS 2000, "minor problem"

6 posts by 5 people · 23 Jan 2001 07:57 UTC - 24 Jan 2001 03:30 UTC

Olav K. Malmin 23 Jan 2001 07:57 UTC#208336
Bought this one yesterday, and modified it right away with bhmotorsports all chassis patch. First impressions: Head and shoulders above the betaish F1-2000 and GP3. Framerates are good at 800x600 2xFSAA, and the tracks looks very good. Driving school is also very fun. Why couldn't they just release this game in the first place without the F1-2000 embarrasment ? And PC Gamer UK's 40% is so laughable that I did not renew my subscription... But there are always some problems. Mine is that it is impossible to start a race without getting thrown back to WinME, and sometimes it does this when loading a track for testing too. Really annoying. My system is Cel566@850, V5 5500 AGP with latest (and final :( )drivers, WinME with DX8, SB Live Player. Suggestions ? -- Olav K. Malmin remove .spam when replying
"Olav K. Malmin" <[email hidden]> wrote Why couldn't they just release this game in the first place > without the F1-2000 embarrasment ? And PC Gamer UK's 40% is so > laughable that I did not renew my subscription... The reason was TIME! EA saw that GP3 would most likely MISS the start of the season. The bought the rights to scgt not to get the game, which they quickly orphaned, but to get the prebuilt software engine. Considering ISI only had about 1 year to get F12k out the door, it was a pretty amazing effort. Then once 2k was done, they could spend some time polishing and adding features that the release date didn't allow. dave henrie
"Dave Henrie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:B2gb6.299646$[email hidden]... > > "Olav K. Malmin" <[email hidden]> wrote > Why couldn't they just release this game in the first place > > without the F1-2000 embarrasment ? And PC Gamer UK's 40% is so > > laughable that I did not renew my subscription... > The reason was TIME! EA saw that GP3 would most likely MISS the startof > the season. The bought the rights to scgt not to get the game, which they > quickly orphaned, but to get the prebuilt software engine. ConsideringISI > only had about 1 year to get F12k out the door, it was a pretty amazing > effort. > Then once 2k was done, they could spend some time polishing and adding > features that the release date didn't allow. > dave henrie Rushing a game out the door is not the sort of "amazing effort" that I appreciate. And I think F1CS2000 seems a bit rushed as well. The AI's racing lines are awful, for one thing. That pretty much ruins the game right there, not to mention other problems. -Aubrey
I agree totally. I'd rather have a game released late and actually finished. Who on this NG wants to see a half finished World Sports Cars get released early? It's companies like EA that give publishers such a bad reputation. They completely ruined Ultima 9 by insisting Origin release it before it had even reached beta testing (under threat of cancelling the project). It must be hell to be a developer signed on with them. "Aubrey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:zAjb6.3510$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (7 lines)> > Rushing a game out the door is not the sort of "amazing effort" that I > appreciate. And I think F1CS2000 seems a bit rushed as well. The AI's > racing lines are awful, for one thing. That pretty much ruins the game > right there, not to mention other problems. > > -Aubrey
In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] (Olav K. Malmin) wrote: >Bought this one yesterday, and modified it right away with >bhmotorsports all chassis patch. First impressions: Head and shoulders >above the betaish F1-2000 and GP3. Judging from the demo, graphics look the same, framerate is just about the same. Single track looks about the same. AI improved. They don't give access to the Driving School mode, but while perhaps a nice addon, that isn't what I'd buy an F1 sim for. I don't see how this can be described as "head and shoulders" above its predecessor. Again, based on the demo. Haven't seen anyone say the full game is *that* much better. Do you think so? >Why couldn't they just release this game in the first place >without the F1-2000 embarrasment ? Time, money.competition. And now they seem to be getting a fair number of people to have paid them twice.
> Time, money.competition. And now they seem to be getting a fair number of > people to have paid them twice. yup some have...not me...I waited...:) same with gp2.5. I'll wait for a real update...but in the meantime....a CART sim would be nice.... dave henrie

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy