All you need to do is check out the review at
http://www.gamepen.com/gamepen/review.asp?itemid=3112
Look at page 2: "The frame rate is consistent at 60 fps". Of course, he
doesn't say what kind of killer system he tests it on... The guy has been
kind enough to put his email address in the review so I hope someone will
set this dude straight (or get the info how to get 60fps). 60 fps... yeah, I
wish. I haven't been missing
framerate this bad since I installed Doom II on my old 386...
/The Dude
On Wed, 3 May 2000 11:16:59 +0200, "The Dude" <[email hidden]*>
wrote:
Like Road and Track constantly picking their 'Car of the Year' from
the company that pays them the most advertising $$$, the 'killer
system' is paid for by EA and therefore, gets 120FPS but the software
only allows 60FPS.
Odds are the person read the ad and wrote a review. Next question?
Quoted text (9 lines)
>All you need to do is check out the review at >http://www.gamepen.com/gamepen/review.asp?itemid=3112 > >Look at page 2: "The frame rate is consistent at 60 fps". Of course, he >doesn't say what kind of killer system he tests it on... The guy has been >kind enough to put his email address in the review so I hope someone will >set this dude straight (or get the info how to get 60fps). 60 fps... yeah, I >wish. I haven't been missing >framerate this bad since I installed Doom II on my old 386...Stephen <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> In testing 60 fps is quite easy to get even with a PII 350. In race mode,
> well now thats rather different.
Stephen...
60 fps is easy in which game?
Pops
Stephen...
60 fps is easy in which game?
Pops
time to add to the off topicness...:)
I used to play a ton of Doom II and Heretic over the modem to modem
connection with my friend. He was ALWAYS a generation ahead of me on
cpu's. And so his frame rate was usually better. I'd come around the
corner, spot him and start shooting...scoring hits, he'd turn and still
churn out more shots than me and kill me even tho I had the jump on him.
The only times I did very well was when I achieved cpu parity...hehe.
then, of course, he'd immeadiately run out and grab something quicker..
dang him... :)
We'll probably see this until the day our console games are made by
Cray and require their own small in=home Nuke reactor to power all the
chips...
dave henrie
Jeff Salzmann wrote:
Quoted text (20 lines)
> > On Wed, 3 May 2000 11:16:59 +0200, "The Dude" <[email hidden]*> > wrote: > > >All you need to do is check out the review at > >http://www.gamepen.com/gamepen/review.asp?itemid=3112 > > > >Look at page 2: "The frame rate is consistent at 60 fps". Of course, he > >doesn't say what kind of killer system he tests it on... The guy has been > >kind enough to put his email address in the review so I hope someone will > >set this dude straight (or get the info how to get 60fps). 60 fps... yeah, I > >wish. I haven't been missing > >framerate this bad since I installed Doom II on my old 386... > > Like Road and Track constantly picking their 'Car of the Year' from > the company that pays them the most advertising $$$, the 'killer > system' is paid for by EA and therefore, gets 120FPS but the software > only allows 60FPS. > > Odds are the person read the ad and wrote a review. Next question?60 fps in what? F1 2000?
I also have a p2 350.
I deleted F1 2000.
Chris
In article <[email hidden]>, "Stephen"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
>In testing 60 fps is quite easy to get even with a PII 350. Inrace mode,
>well now thats rather different.
>
>
>
>
>
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
In article <[email hidden]>, Jeff Salzmann <[email hidden]> wrote:
>Like Road and Track constantly picking their 'Car of the Year' from
>the company that pays them the most advertising $$$,
Ummm, R&T doesn't name a "Car of the Year". Were you thinking of Motor
Trend? Off topic (hey, you start it :-)), R&T strikes me as quite technical
and credible. Of course, they are biased as any subjective car reviewing mag
(or car loving nut) will be. Now Motor Trend...well, you know about "if you
don't have anything nice to say...".
I haven't looked at the review as I'm reading this offline, but is it the PC
version they're reviewing or PSX ?
I heard the PSX version runs pretty well so maybe that was it ;)
--
Ian Parker
> >
> > On Wed, 3 May 2000 11:16:59 +0200, "The Dude" <[email hidden]*>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >All you need to do is check out the review at
> > >http://www.gamepen.com/gamepen/review.asp?itemid=3112
> > >
> > >Look at page 2: "The frame rate is consistent at 60 fps". Of course, he
> > >doesn't say what kind of killer system he tests it on... The guy has
been
> > >kind enough to put his email address in the review so I hope someone
will
> > >set this dude straight (or get the info how to get 60fps). 60 fps...
yeah, I
> > >wish. I haven't been missing
> > >framerate this bad since I installed Doom II on my old 386...
> >
> > Like Road and Track constantly picking their 'Car of the Year' from
> > the company that pays them the most advertising $$$, the 'killer
> > system' is paid for by EA and therefore, gets 120FPS but the software
> > only allows 60FPS.
> >
> > Odds are the person read the ad and wrote a review. Next question?
In testing 60 fps is quite easy to get even with a PII 350. In race mode,
well now thats rather different.
Chris Bloom wrote in message
> I deleted F1 2000.
Your loss.
> I deleted F1 2000.
Your loss.
