Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

NASCAR setups

13 posts by 7 people · 21 Jun 1995 - 28 Jun 1995

I have a couple of questions for the intelligent people of this newsgroup: When going about setting up my car for a track, what is the general order of changing things? For example, shocks, camber, spoilers, wheel lock, and then tire pressure, or some order like that? I know that the main determinant in setup is tire temperatures in that they are supposed to be relatively the same temperature, but I always have a problem with the LF and RF tires being 70 - 90 degrees apart. Could someone give me some hints on general techniques on how to fix this? I understand adjusting spoilers and cross weight, but I haven't yet grasped how stiffening or softening shocks, tire pressure, and weight bias work together. Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Danny Fe***an -- Danny Ray Fe***an Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332 uucp: ...!{decvax,hplabs,ncar,purdue,rutgers}!gatech!prism!gt7191b
Carman Oko 21 Jun 1995#302623
For setting up a car in NASCAR racing the first thing I do is try to pace with the Sim cars. Of course I am using the Easy default setup. I run at least 50 laps or so just to see the other cars and were the groove is. The next thing to do is adjust the rear wieght , spoilers and cross weight so the car handles loose on full tanks and real good with 3/4 thru 1/4 tank. Always remember the race is not won on the first 10 laps but in the ending laps get the tires to last for a full tank of gas if possible. Next I adjust the shocks, tire pressure and camber as minor adjustments to get the car to handle at different times in the turn. I would suggest you find the ncar.wri file that tells the process on how to set up a car. Setting up a car does take time but once you have done it a couple of times each new track it gets easier. When it comes to car set ups I prefer a loose car were as my teammate in IWCC perfers a tighter car than I. We send each other our best setups and than start from there. Setups are hard to swap with drivers that do not now your style. Swapping setups might hurt more than it helps. Just my $.02 Carman Okon Eastman Kodak Co. Standard disclaimer
Todd Norr 21 Jun 1995#302624
lock, etc. I'd agree with Carmen's reply...until you have "your line", setups are pretty much irrelevant, but if there is an "order" to adjustments, it would be spoiler/airdam/weight distribution first, crossweight second, tire pressure/camber/shocks third, then repeat over and over again. The setup of a car is manipulation of a physical system, so their is no "cookbook" or linear approach...everything is a compromise and affects everything else. I've traded setups with folks and only once got one that fit my "style", however, in trading setups one thing I've heard (and unfortunately found, no big suprise) that beyond a "driving style" there is also the notion of running down a complete fuel load...some setups I trashed for one reason or another were actually good, but became good late in the fuel load. Some setups I've had were perfect for 10-15 laps, and then went away because I was too impatient to test the setup over the entire fuel load. If anything this "setup stuff" has given me a much much better appreciation for the dedication of the real drivers to run lap after lap after lap in practice...but in truth, that's where the championships are probably won. Todd
TOBY BRANFO 21 Jun 1995#302625
CO> When it comes to car set ups I prefer a loose car were as my CO> teammate in IWCC perfers a tighter car than I. We send each other CO> our best setups and than start from there. Setups are hard to swap CO> with drivers that do not now your style. Swapping setups might hurt CO> more than it helps. OK - setups are persoanl - ie they suit different styles. OK - lets get back to the point of these questions - people like me are asking "How do you put in these fast laps" aren't they. What we are asking for is instruction in how to drive better. So, _PLEASE_.....DON'T give just smug "practice a lot" answers - that's not helpful - either keep quiet or be more constructive. Techniques are worth discussing. In F1 or ICR, its's easy to talk about how you take a particular corner.....what's your entry-apex-exit speed/revs/gear, and your line - braking point, turn-in point, accelaration point, etc. It's helpful to communicate what setup you use to achieve this. I've learnt a lot, and helped a few, in this fashion. So, would anyone who is skillful AND helpful like to offer something detailed to impress us novices? How about describing _your_ method of taking any part (or whole) circuit at speed.....tell me about your speed/revs/gear at any/every key point, how much lock you are using, how much braking/accelaration, and what the car is doing at that point. Are the tires squealing? How hot are they/do they get? Is there much under or over-steer. Are you holding a line, or drifting? If things are going wrong - where have you over-cooked/over-braked or whatever - and what happens? Am I the only one here who has problems with some descriptions people give? Could vague terms like "getting loose", "pushing", etc, either be explained in detail when you use them, or be avoided? Perhaps it's UK as supposed to US slang that makes these terms rather vague. But they don't really mean much to me. I recognise understeer when I'm turning the wheel and sliding straight on. I know I've unbalanced the car when I brake hard and the back starts to slide around turning me in faster - and opposite lock to correct only makes things worse the other way. If anyone could offer up something like this - they'll be REALLY helpful to those novices like me who want practical help in learning to drive these cars. Any instructors out there? Cheers! --- * RM 1.3 U0414 * "Windws i ine for bckground communiaions." - Bll Gats, 193
Chris Drak 22 Jun 1995#302667
In <Swapping setups might hurt more than it helps. >Just my $.02 >Carman Okon >Eastman Kodak Co. >Standard disclaimer You are absolutely right! I race my boss over the modem a lot. We were working on racing Atlanta and he gave me his setup so we could get right into it. The up-shot of this is that he can turn 181-182 with this setup and the best I can do with the SAME setup is 178-179. Driving style makes a BIG difference in an optimized setup! For what its worth, Chris
Carman Oko 27 Jun 1995#302856
Toby, No Smug answers from me. I think I understand what you are asking. In the US we use Loose to discribe the way the car tends to overstreer. or as they say the cars wants to swap ends. If a car is loose it tends to be alot faster than a car that wants to push. What I mean when I say push is understeer. The car tends to try to meet the wall head on. This is a bad condition. The push is the best condition to try to test in. Get the car to a point were it is pushing real bad in the corner than work on the setup so the car tends to be on the neutral to loose condition. The best why to find out how you are doing is to pace yourself against a sim car. For instance at Atlanta the sim cars take turn 1 at 162 or so. try to keep up with them in turn 1. Adjust your car until you get thru the turn at the same or better speed. Run a full tank of gas as a setup that is good for 10-15 laps is not a good race setup. The ncar.wri file that has been floating around for a while is a good start. I don't know were you can find it. If anyone out there knows were it is Please fill us in! ;-)) Carman Okon Eastman Kodak Co. Standard disclaimer
>The ncar.wri file that has been floating around for a while is a good start. >I don't know were you can find it. If anyone out there knows were it is >Please fill us in! ;-)) It is a great file on how to setup a car for Atlanta, its helped me out alot. You can find it at: ftp://didnt.doit.wisc.edu/PublicFiles/Racing/NASCAR/Misc/ncarrw.zip Hope this helps. :) Jeff
TOBY BRANFO 27 Jun 1995#302858
CO> No Smug answers from me. I think I understand what you are asking. Your're right - not a smug answer at all, and you did understand what I was asking. THANKS! That's very helpful - got some things to try now. That ncar.wri file - I'll go looking for that as well. Your name will get added to the rec.autos.simms.instructors list, as supposed to the rec.autos.simms.overcompetitive.egos list! B-) Cheers! --- * RM 1.3 U0414 * Three people _can_ keep a secret...if two of them are dead
Todd Norr 27 Jun 1995#302859
This is one of the better comments I've seen...if you trade setups, make sure you ASK what length of race people are running...cars change over the length of a fuel stop, and a setup can "come in" after 10-20 laps, or "go away" after 10-15 laps...a good race setup should balance as the fuel load goes down and the tire wear goes up. Ok, then you need a UK to Dixie Translator, which is of course, oxymoronic, but...we'll try to teach y'all about racin' First, if you are from the UK, here's the First Things you need to know: 1) Push = Tight = you see the wall when you hit. 2) Loose = outta control = you don't see the wall when you hit (definitions supplied by Neil Bonnett) 3) you drive on tars. 4) tars win races... 5) puttin' wedge in her makes her tight...exactly the opposite of what happens when you put wedge in a UK girl, she probably gets loose. 6) Tars come in when they get hot, go away when they get too hot (215-230 degrees) 7) body roll has nothing to do with athletics in bed...body roll is too soft of a right front shock. I hope that helps >:>
Todd Norr 28 Jun 1995#302897
Ok, in previous post I said "give up track position if you can get it back"..here's where that DOESN'T work: 1) Shorttracks like Martinsville and North Wilkesboro. Both are very hard to pass on and have lots of cautions, which completely mess up any planned pitstops...here you DON'T want to surrender track position. 2) Talladega. You lose the draft, you lose. Nuff Said. 3) Road Courses (Sears Point and Watkins Glen). Here, race like F1...track position is everything. 4) Resurfaced tracks that have one racing groove..again track position is a premium as passing is hard. Stock cars in the "marbles" (ie all the ***that accumulates up near the wall) will NOT RACE...in fact they will paint the wall. As the game stands now the only tracks that have "resurfaced" grooves that are hard to race are Rockingham and Dover (Dover isn't resurfaced in the game, but it always sucked). Your basic strategy should be on these tracks is to fight for track position ASSUMING the fight doesn't set off "one of those racin' deals" (Southern-speak for Wreck). With the exception of Talladega (where there is plenty of room to race) and the road courses (which is just standard F1 patience), you should expect on the others that even if you burn up the tars, the race will not stay green that long...and burnups will work out ok. However, if you get caught in an extended green, especially on the shorttracks, keep in mind that "what goes around comes around". It is not at all unusual on the above tracks for lead cars to have to pit under green on off-sequences...don't get discouraged if you have to pit and go down a lap (or 2). Stick in there...don't race a poor-handling car to a caution...chances are you'll BE the caution. Fuel Economy wins on 1.5mile and greater tracks that have wide grooves...Talladega, Atlanta, C***te, and Michigan to name the prominent four...here you can plan pit strategy and "strategize" your way to a win...however on these tracks if you go down a lap it's very difficult to get it back...the fuel strategy only works if you can stay on the lead lap.
Todd Norr 28 Jun 1995#302898
This is pretty much meant for UK/FR etc players, and most Southern and Yankee players will probably consider it mundane. Anyway, here's a completely trivial set of tips for UK players..especially those that try to race hard in the corners. The biggest adjustment from open wheel (ie, whimpy F1) to NASCAR is the notion that you are carrying a LOT more weight on narrow tires (or tars, to be accurate). Tars win races, however trite that may sound. A good setup should give you consistent handling and speed over the entire fuel load...not just in the first few laps. Most IndyCar or F1 races revolve around speed and track position..in NASCAR, it's ok to give up track position if YOU CAN GET IT BACK over the entire fuel load. The WORST temptations in NASCAR are to: 1) run hard INTO the corners, and heat the tars. It will give you better lap times for a while, but these are LONG races, and will do you no good whatsoever over 500 miles. 2) assume that NASCAR is demolition derby, and go door-to-door with someone for any length of time. Again, tar wear is horrid, although the fans will love it. As stupid as it may sound, the best strategy is to run consistent laps with low tar wear (again, tars are the key thing). A stock car is HEAVY relative to a F1 frame, and you need to adjust for that. Another lil secret no one in the Lil Ol South ever admits to is that stock cars race like Bricks. Don't expect they will handle well...don't expect you can find a setup where they stick perfect..this isn't multi-million dollar F1...this is simply a frame, 720HP carbuerated engine, and some sheet metal on narrow tars. It will not race "well"...it's not really a race car by European standards. Unlike F1 where the car feels like an extension of the driver's body, a stock car is more like a bucking horse...it does not (and SHOULD NOT) want to do what you want it to do...the premium here is not on the car and technology, it's on YOU the driver..if you are good to her, she's good to you. Once you make that mental turn that your car is as much your opponent as your fellow racers, THEN you are ready to take to the track for NASCAR. This is primarily why all those "experienced" folks say "seat time is everything, setup is nothing". A stock car should "push" (understeer) as the fuel load decreases, assuming the tars are heating too fast. Many lead drivers like Earnhardt and Gordon have setups that are a touch loose (oversteer) at the beginning to compensate for this. However, that means DON'T BE GREEDY early..you have to be patient. Dale Earnhardt runs a lil loose at the beginning so that if he has to race, and has to pass in traffic, the extra tar heat doesn't really result in much of a push. Drivers like DW (that's Darrell Waltrip for UK'ers) and Morgan Shepherd tend to run a lil tight (another word for "push") as they run for fuel economy...DW has mellowed over the years and emphasizes that lap times are irrelavent..you want "elapsed time not lap time". If you can eliminate a fuel stop or run strong at the end of a fuel run, that can be as effective as running fast in the first 10 laps. Here's the worst question you can ask about a setup: "what's your fastest lap?" WHO CARES!!! If you need to qualify upfront because you can't handle traffic, work on traffic, don't work on qualifying. Pole Position is very overrated in NASCAR (again, in F1, the cars get their primary downforce from the front wing..therefore passing is hard..in NASCAR this isn't true..you can learn to pass). Earnhardt qualifies like junk because RCR Enterprises runs a qualifying setup very close to their race setup...they approach qualifying as another practice (partly due to the fact that Earnhardt is one of the best in traffic). A much better question to ask is: How many miles did this setup run and over what time? That's a NASCAR question! Again, the emphasis is not on velocity (a F1 concept) but on Speed (a NASCAR concept). I hope this helps a bit (especially for those who don't go racin' with us every week). BTW, my comments here are not designed to denigrate F1...it's just simply that F1 (and Indycar) IMHO grew up as "manufacturer's sports" where the premium is on technology...NASCAR grew up as a "driver's sport" where the premium is on the man...it's not better or worse, it's just different, and you need to consider the sport's roots when jumping into the seat.

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy