Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

Anybody try GP2 on a PPro?

17 posts by 10 people · 25 Jul 1996 - 30 Jul 1996

I was just wondering how the frame rate was on Gp2 since I will be buying a new mobo. I'm trying to decide between a PPro 200 or a P200 or just go to a P166 and wait for the MMX stuff to come out. Thanx. Frank Morissette
The Pentium Pro 200 would probably run GP2 slower then a Pentium 200. This is due to the fact that the PPro's architeceture is optimized for 32-bit operation where GP2 runs under DOS(16-bit code). In a comparison of the two processors running 16-bit code the P200 tended to out perform the PPro 200. On Thu, 25 Jul 1996 11:14:07 -0700, "Kenton R. Wilson"
Quoted text (11 lines)>> I was just wondering how the frame rate was on Gp2 since I >> will be buying a new mobo. I'm trying to decide between a >> PPro 200 or a P200 or just go to a P166 and wait for the MMX >> stuff to come out. Thanx. >> Frank Morissette >> Don't go for any of the P200's,they're barely different than the P166. >> There just so expensive and popular because they're new. GP2 runs fine >> on a P166!
The truth is just a poor excuse for lack of imagination.
> The Pentium Pro 200 would probably run GP2 slower then a Pentium 200. > This is due to the fact that the PPro's architeceture is optimized for > 32-bit operation where GP2 runs under DOS(16-bit code). In a > comparison of the two processors running 16-bit code the P200 tended > to out perform the PPro 200. While the above is true, a program called FASTVID virtually eliminates this inherent slowdown. We tested GP2 on a fast Dell 166 vs a Gateway P6 200 (matrox 4m, 32 ram) and indeed the Dell was generating better frame rates. However, after loading Fastvid the pro200 was a good deal faster . E.g. Svga... main view - all objects, all textures except sky on, mirrors - track,smoke only(no mirror texture)... estimated fps=>25. Set for 18.x gives PO of 55-65% except in very congested situations where fps=90-105%. (playback always shows PO of 125-150% or more (?))
Quoted text (11 lines)> On Thu, 25 Jul 1996 11:14:07 -0700, "Kenton R. Wilson" > >> I was just wondering how the frame rate was on Gp2 since I > >> will be buying a new mobo. I'm trying to decide between a > >> PPro 200 or a P200 or just go to a P166 and wait for the MMX > >> stuff to come out. Thanx. > ...
JEB 26 Jul 1996#329349
Quoted text (25 lines)> > The Pentium Pro 200 would probably run GP2 slower then a Pentium 200. > > This is due to the fact that the PPro's architeceture is optimized for > > 32-bit operation where GP2 runs under DOS(16-bit code). In a > > comparison of the two processors running 16-bit code the P200 tended > > to out perform the PPro 200. > While the above is true, a program called FASTVID virtually eliminates this inherent > slowdown. We tested GP2 on a fast Dell 166 vs a Gateway P6 200 (matrox 4m, 32 ram) and > indeed the Dell was generating better frame rates. However, after loading Fastvid the > pro200 was a good deal faster . E.g. Svga... main view - all objects, all textures except > sky on, mirrors - track,smoke only(no mirror texture)... estimated fps=>25. Set for 18.x > gives PO of 55-65% except in very congested situations where fps=90-105%. (playback always > shows PO of 125-150% or more (?)) > > On Thu, 25 Jul 1996 11:14:07 -0700, "Kenton R. Wilson" > > >> I was just wondering how the frame rate was on Gp2 since I > > >> will be buying a new mobo. I'm trying to decide between a > > >> PPro 200 or a P200 or just go to a P166 and wait for the MMX > > >> stuff to come out. Thanx. > > ...
Now, don't go tellin' them about FASTVID...hehehe That's "our" little secret. A P6/200 with FASTVID on is the fastest machine out, period. Any sim, any frame rate type game. Nothing is faster. JEB in Vegas
> Now, don't go tellin' them about FASTVID...hehehe > That's "our" little secret. > A P6/200 with FASTVID on is the fastest machine out, period. > Any sim, any frame rate type game. Nothing is faster. > JEB in Vegas
: The Pentium Pro 200 would probably run GP2 slower then a Pentium 200. : This is due to the fact that the PPro's architeceture is optimized for : 32-bit operation where GP2 runs under DOS(16-bit code). In a : comparison of the two processors running 16-bit code the P200 tended : to out perform the PPro 200. Except that GP2 uses Watcom's DOS/4GW DOS extender. I understand that any DOS/4GW programs are 32 bit.
JEB 28 Jul 1996#329805
Quoted text (12 lines)> hehehe....you are so full of shit its running full steam > out of your ***! > >Now, don't go tellin' them about FASTVID...hehehe > >That's "our" little secret. > >A P6/200 with FASTVID on is the fastest machine out, period. > >Any sim, any frame rate type game. Nothing is faster. > >JEB in Vegas
Hey, Thanks AGAIN....hehehehe I'm flattered...two notes, wow! JEB in Vegas
JEB 28 Jul 1996#329806
Quoted text (12 lines)> hehehe....you are so full of shit its running full steam > out of your ***! > >Now, don't go tellin' them about FASTVID...hehehe > >That's "our" little secret. > >A P6/200 with FASTVID on is the fastest machine out, period. > >Any sim, any frame rate type game. Nothing is faster. > >JEB in Vegas
OH, thought I might mention the p6 get a score of 379 processor 606 video on the gp2 log:on test. What does your machine get? Faster, I'll bet...huh? JEB in Vegas
JEB 28 Jul 1996#329807
Quoted text (12 lines)> hehehe....you are so full of shit its running full steam > out of your ***! > >Now, don't go tellin' them about FASTVID...hehehe > >That's "our" little secret. > >A P6/200 with FASTVID on is the fastest machine out, period. > >Any sim, any frame rate type game. Nothing is faster. > >JEB in Vegas
Thank you. What kinda 'puter are you driving these days? JEB in Vegas
Chip Wild 29 Jul 1996#330128
hehehe....you are so full of shit its running full steam out of your ***! >Now, don't go tellin' them about FASTVID...hehehe >That's "our" little secret. >A P6/200 with FASTVID on is the fastest machine out, period. >Any sim, any frame rate type game. Nothing is faster. >JEB in Vegas
Hmmm... Weird... my P180 gets a 349 on processor. On video I'm way under that... 34x but it's a DRAM card... Greets, Yves
JEB 29 Jul 1996#330130
Quoted text (11 lines)> > OH, thought I might mention the p6 get a score of > > 379 processor > > 606 video > > on the gp2 log:on test. > Hmmm... Weird... my P180 gets a 349 on processor. On video I'm way > under that... 34x but it's a DRAM card... > Greets, > Yves
I saw a poster say that his P5/166 gets a processor score of something like 429. That's a smokin' machine. JEB in Vegas
Quoted text (7 lines)>> OH, thought I might mention the p6 get a score of >> 379 processor >> 606 video >> on the gp2 log:on test. >Hmmm... Weird... my P180 gets a 349 on processor. On video I'm way >under that... 34x but it's a DRAM card...
Mmmmm, by dx2/66 gets around 70 for both cpu & video. Greeeeeat!
JEB 29 Jul 1996#330132
Quoted text (9 lines)> >OH, thought I might mention the p6 get a score of > >379 processor > >606 video > Whats your video card again ? > Austin, Texas
A Matrox Millenium 4 meg. JEB in Vegas
Ville Ko 30 Jul 1996#330491
Quoted text (7 lines)>OH, thought I might mention the p6 get a score of >379 processor >606 video >on the gp2 log:on test. >What does your machine get? >Faster, I'll bet...huh? >JEB in Vegas
strange....I have p166 and gplog gives me the same processor speed....but like U I have a matrox mill. too but my video speed is "only" 479.....very strange....I think they should be vice versa....eh? So the question is can your processor affect your video speed? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<Ville Kopu>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ViK at IRC, #f1 & #gp2 http://koti.kolumbus.fi/~vkopu ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<Second is first of loserS>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ville Ko 30 Jul 1996#330492
Quoted text (13 lines)>>OH, thought I might mention the p6 get a score of >>379 processor >>606 video >>on the gp2 log:on test. >>What does your machine get? >>Faster, I'll bet...huh? >>JEB in Vegas >strange....I have p166 and gplog gives me the same processor >speed....but like U I have a matrox mill. too but my video speed is >"only" 479.....very strange....I think they should be vice >versa....eh? >So the question is can your processor affect your video speed?
yep...I checked it again and my processor speed infact was 393...so it was more than yours...but having read your earlier posts I KNOW your PC can run the game faster... ....I wonder if those gplog scores really give us true performance score. Can someone explain this? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<Ville Kopu>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ViK at IRC, #f1 & #gp2 http://koti.kolumbus.fi/~vkopu ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<Second is first of loserS>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy