Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

GP2 speed

2 posts by 2 people · 27 Jul 1996 - 28 Jul 1996

Tim Olso 27 Jul 1996#329484
I don't really know how fast or slow GP2 is, because I'm still waiting for it. A lot of you are saying that GP2 sucks because the SVGA graphics are so slow, and that ICR2 and NASCAR are better because you can get a better SVGA mode frame rate. Let me ask you this: When NASCAR first came out, how many of you were able to run it in SVGA mode with a lot of detail and get a decent frame rate out of it? Not very many people had the hardware for it back then. The same goes for ICR2. Computers are faster now, and the code is optimized so ICR 2 runs better than NASCAR in SVGA mode. It can still slow down, though. In ICR2, with most detail turned on in SVGA mode, I've been able to get up to 20 fps. The lowest was 9 fps. It depends on the track and where I am on the track. From the pictures I've seen so far, GP2 has more detail than ICR2 or NASCAR. You can expect it to run slower then in SVGA mode than ICR2 or NASCAR. Why don't you run in regular VGA mode then, until Pentium 300s or something like that come out? I heard from a friend that the VGA mode of GP2 isn't all that bad. I think the same thing from some of the VGA pictures I've seen. Just my 2 cents worth. Tim [link lost in import]
Quoted text (16 lines)>I don't really know how fast or slow GP2 is, because I'm still waiting >for it. A lot of you are saying that GP2 sucks because the SVGA graphics >are so slow, and that ICR2 and NASCAR are better because you can get >a better SVGA mode frame rate. Let me ask you this: When NASCAR first >came out, how many of you were able to run it in SVGA mode with a lot >of detail and get a decent frame rate out of it? Not very many people had the >hardware for it back then. The same goes for ICR2. Computers are faster now, >and the code is optimized so ICR 2 runs better than NASCAR in SVGA mode. It >can still slow down, though. In ICR2, with most detail turned on in SVGA >mode, I've been able to get up to 20 fps. The lowest was 9 fps. It depends on >the track and where I am on the track. From the pictures I've seen so far, >GP2 has more detail than ICR2 or NASCAR. You can expect it to run slower then >in SVGA mode than ICR2 or NASCAR. Why don't you run in regular VGA mode >then, until Pentium 300s or something like that come out? I heard from a >friend that the VGA mode of GP2 isn't all that bad. I think the same thing >from some of the VGA pictures I've seen. Just my 2 cents worth.
Hooray, someone with some common sense. I run GP2 in SVGA with most textures off and all detail on using a lowly P100 and it is FINE. With the same machine you can texture all VGA graphics and get a reasonable 16FPS. IMHO there is nothing wrong with the VGA graphics so all these people saying GP2 graphics suck GIVE US A BREAK! Mark _________________________________ "..every lap I think `Oh bollocks! This is dreadful..`" Damon Hill __________________________________

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy