Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

how to overclock????!!!!!!

13 posts by 10 people · 02 Aug 1996 - 17 Aug 1996

Kuang Ya 02 Aug 1996#331279
please someone tell me how to overclock my cpu!!!!!
Cam0474 03 Aug 1996#331443
It only works if you can change the CPU-speed by changing the jumpersetting. I've got my p90 running on 100 just by replacing three jumpers and it works great (for almost over a year now) Greetingz Frait
Quoted text (7 lines)> >please someone tell me how to overclock my cpu!!!!! > It only works if you can change the CPU-speed by changing the jumpersetting. > I've got my p90 running on 100 just by replacing three jumpers and it works > great (for almost over a year now) > Greetingz Frait
Advice, Don't do it! This is the kind of stuff that I do for a living and the reason that your CPU is a 90 is because it failed tests to be a 100. When you overclock, you are not going to light the processor on fire in most cases, but you will increase your chances of incorrect data processing. This may only happen once in a blue moon but won't you feel better knowing that the number you just got from your computer was correct? -- *********************************************************** * Jonathan A. Robinson * * National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center * * Mississippi State, MS * * http://www.erc.msstate.edu/~jon * ***********************************************************
Ron R. II 04 Aug 1996#331600
Quoted text (15 lines)>> >please someone tell me how to overclock my cpu!!!!! >> It only works if you can change the CPU-speed by changing the jumpersetting. >> I've got my p90 running on 100 just by replacing three jumpers and it works >> great (for almost over a year now) >> Greetingz Frait >Advice, Don't do it! This is the kind of stuff that I do for a living >and the >reason that your CPU is a 90 is because it failed tests to be a 100. >When you overclock, you are not going to light the processor on fire in >most cases, but you will increase your chances of incorrect data >processing. This may only happen once in a blue moon but won't you feel >better knowing that the number you just got from your computer was >correct?
Would that be anything like the infamous floating point prob in the early intel chips? Ron R II *********************************************** ** Keep the shiny side up & the hammer down ** *** Ron "Cougar" Riekens II *** **** Owner - Driver **** **** Medallion Motorsports/*** Photography **** *** NASS ARCA Series #96 Pontiac *** ***********************************************
Not really, but I will feel better getting a "P-200" for several hundred dollars less than Intel are asking people to pay at the moment. I had a "P-200" six months before Intel did, and it's still going strong. By the time it's ready to expire, it'll be worth about $20 and I could throw it in the trash anyway. Such is the march of progress. Just the other side of the coin.... Cheers! John _________________________________ __ _____| |_____ __ ________| |__| :| John Wallace | |__| |________ \ :| |::| :| Team WW Racing TSW | |::| | / > :| |::| :|_________________________________| |::| | < / :|__|::|____/ * Sim Racing News * \____|::|__| \ /______:/ \::/ http://sneezy.dcn.ed.ac.uk/simnews/index.htm \::/ \._____\ http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~harmon/simnews
dickb 05 Aug 1996#331781
says...
Quoted text (29 lines)>>Advice, Don't do it! This is the kind of stuff that I do for a living >>and the >>reason that your CPU is a 90 is because it failed tests to be a 100. >>When you overclock, you are not going to light the processor on fire in >>most cases, but you will increase your chances of incorrect data >>processing. This may only happen once in a blue moon but won't you feel >>better knowing that the number you just got from your computer was >>correct? >Not really, but I will feel better getting a "P-200" for several hundred >dollars less than Intel are asking people to pay at the moment. I had a >"P-200" six months before Intel did, and it's still going strong. By the >time it's ready to expire, it'll be worth about $20 and I could throw it >in the trash anyway. Such is the march of progress. >Just the other side of the coin.... >Cheers! >John > _________________________________ > __ _____| |_____ __ >________| |__| :| John Wallace | |__| |________ > \ :| |::| :| Team WW Racing TSW | |::| | / > > :| |::| :|_________________________________| |::| | < > / :|__|::|____/ * Sim Racing News * \____|::|__| \ >/______:/ \::/ http://sneezy.dcn.ed.ac.uk/simnews/index.htm \::/ \._____\ > http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~harmon/simnews
I agree wholeheartedly. How did you get to 200? What did it start as? I have a p5-150 juiced to 166 but my mobo doesnt list 200. It has a row of 8 dipswitches and I believe a jumper that I have not located yet. The last 4 dipswitch settings combined with the mystery jumper set the speed. 166 is dips4-8 on and j1n1 4/5. I would really like to go all the way to 200 and am figuring at the most I will replace this CPU in a year so whats to lose. Any ideas?
Rob Sn 05 Aug 1996#331782
Just cos your chip say 75/90 etc on it, it does not mean it will fail when you chip it. as far as I am aware Intel speed test a silicon slice of chips untill they all pass a set speed test. Dropping the speed if they get a failure. Sooo your chip may have run OK at a higher speed but lowered due to another chip on the same slice failing the test. my 75 has been running at 100 for 3 months no probs. If this chipping business wreaked chips intel would be smiling as they would be selling loads of replacements. No they have put speed limiters on tjeir new chips to stop overclocking. for a company to do this must be proof that the chipping is working for a large amount of chippers :) rob
James Bev 05 Aug 1996#331783
[snip overclocking posts] Not sure if this'll help, but if your motherboard is an Intel Endeavor, you can get the most up-to-date documentation on them at www.intel.com. Or maybe your manufacturer has a web page with current documentation on it. The docs I got with my Endeavor were pretty elderly, and didn't document all the switches and jumpers, so I d/led the latest from Intel (along with the lastest BIOS). Voila, how to jumper for 200Mhz. Now, if only I could persuade my P133 to run faster than 133Mhz ... James -- James Bevan NeXTMail & MIME welcome
Hi Rob, Actually the clock-limiting was put in place because the surface of the ceramic was being skimmed off (along with the speed markings), and new markings put in place showing a higher rating. Intel is obviously against overclocking, but the clock-limiters stopped SELLING overclocked chips, not to stop people doing it. I agree with you though, it's a great idea! Cheers! John _________________________________ __ _____| |_____ __ ________| |__| :| John Wallace | |__| |________ \ :| |::| :| Team WW Racing TSW | |::| | / > :| |::| :|_________________________________| |::| | < / :|__|::|____/ * Sim Racing News * \____|::|__| \ /______:/ \::/ http://sneezy.dcn.ed.ac.uk/simnews/index.htm \::/ \._____\ http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~harmon/simnews
AndyRoss 06 Aug 1996#331998
Just a note that most Pentium motherboards will run at one of three clock speeds, 50MHz, 60MHz or 66MHz. The chips are available in the following speeds: 60MHz (60MHz x 1) 66MHz (66MHz x 1) 75MHz (50MHz x 1.5) 90MHz (60MHz x 1.5) 100MHz (66MHz x 1.5) 120MHz (60MHz x 2) 133MHz (66MHz x 2) 150MHz (60MHz x 2.5) 166MHz (66MHz x 2.5) 200MHz (66MHz x 3) If you have a 100MHz or 133Mhz Pentium, you can't speed it up. It's already running at the maximum clock rate. Most motherboards seem to have two sets of jumpers. One sets the clock rate, and the other lets the motherboard know what the divider is in the chip. To be honest, I don't know if that last one alters any timings, or just changes the speed shown on the startup screen. Some motherboards may possibly support a 75MHz rate. I think I read that Cyrix may come out with a chip that supports that.
Damn! Does that mean that my P133 which has been running at 200Mhz for six months now is lying to me....? :) P-100 and P-133 can be overclocked just as well as any other CPU. A P100 is not as likely to voerclock (with reasons I bored everyone to tears with in Sim Racing News), but a P-133 is an excellent overclocking candidate. Cheers! John _________________________________ __ _____| |_____ __ ________| |__| :| John Wallace | |__| |________ \ :| |::| :| Team WW Racing TSW | |::| | / > :| |::| :|_________________________________| |::| | < / :|__|::|____/ * Sim Racing News * \____|::|__| \ /______:/ \::/ http://sneezy.dcn.ed.ac.uk/simnews/index.htm \::/ \._____\ http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~harmon/simnews
V1 17 Aug 1996#334024
Quoted text (8 lines)>> If you have a 100MHz or 133Mhz Pentium, you can't speed it up. It's >>already running at the maximum clock rate. >Damn! Does that mean that my P133 which has been running at 200Mhz for >six months now is lying to me....? :) >P-100 and P-133 can be overclocked just as well as any other CPU. A P100 >is not as likely to voerclock (with reasons I bored everyone to tears >with in Sim Racing News), but a P-133 is an excellent overclocking >candidate.
I've overclocked a 100Mhz to 120 Mhz without any problems so... Cheers Martin

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy