GP2 Contest?

It's amazing how no one at Microprose has any info on this contest or the results. No doubt most who entered have stopped in at the web page; in keeping with the spirit of things it too says nada. Does anyone know what's up? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Bob Bruss ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

>Subject: GP2 Contest? >Date: Tue, 03 Sep 1996 22:23:26 GMT >It's amazing how no one at Microprose has any info on this contest or >the results. No doubt most who entered have stopped in at the web >page; in keeping with the spirit of things it too says nada. Does >anyone know what's up? The winner was definitely under 1:20. I know of two guys that beat the 80-second barrier. I was 1:20.234 -- third as far as I know. Josh Beaulieu

Quoted text (9 lines)

>>Subject: GP2 Contest? >>Date: Tue, 03 Sep 1996 22:23:26 GMT >>It's amazing how no one at Microprose has any info on this contest or >>the results. No doubt most who entered have stopped in at the web >>page; in keeping with the spirit of things it too says nada. Does >>anyone know what's up? >The winner was definitely under 1:20. I know of two guys that beat the >80-second barrier. I was 1:20.234 -- third as far as I know. >Josh Beaulieu

I coudn't get under the low 22's. I hope they post the winnning times. They did add a comment to the web page that the winners will be notified on 9/23. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Bob Bruss ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Quoted text (16 lines)

>>>Subject: GP2 Contest? >>>Date: Tue, 03 Sep 1996 22:23:26 GMT >>>It's amazing how no one at Microprose has any info on this contest or >>>the results. No doubt most who entered have stopped in at the web >>>page; in keeping with the spirit of things it too says nada. Does >>>anyone know what's up? >>The winner was definitely under 1:20. I know of two guys that beat the >>80-second barrier. I was 1:20.234 -- third as far as I know. >>Josh Beaulieu >I coudn't get under the low 22's. I hope they post the winnning >times. They did add a comment to the web page that the winners will >be notified on 9/23. >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Bob Bruss >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Should have said 9/13. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Bob Bruss ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~