Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

What does everybody think of X-car

5 posts by 5 people · 19 Mar 1997 - 27 Mar 1997

Robert Mull 19 Mar 1997#359959
Just finished playing a couple of hours and I think it has a lot going with cars. My only gripe is in the control/physics model. It is hard to tell how accurate it is since these are make beleive cars but it feels a little fishy. Not quite as bad as POD or other arcarde games but not as accurate as GP2 or N2. Anybody else?
Quoted text (7 lines)>Just finished playing a couple of hours and I think it has a lot going >for it. Good graphics engine (20-25fps(guessing) with all options on >with cars. My only gripe is in the control/physics model. It is hard >to tell how accurate it is since these are make beleive cars but it >feels a little fishy. Not quite as bad as POD or other arcarde games >but not as accurate as GP2 or N2. Anybody else?
Regarding the physics model, you hit the nail right on the head. That is exactly how I felt about it, not sure how accurate it is since the cars are all 'experimental'. I thought overall the cars could be slowed to easily, and the cornering was inconsistent. Kyle Langston ____________________________________________ IBM #72 Ford Thunderbird - Hurricane Racing http://www.traction.git.net/hurricane/ NASS Series 1997 Winsten Cup Division
David Gary 24 Mar 1997#360661
Quoted text (7 lines)> Just finished playing a couple of hours and I think it has a lot going > for it. Good graphics engine (20-25fps(guessing) with all options on > with cars. My only gripe is in the control/physics model. It is hard > to tell how accurate it is since these are make beleive cars but it > feels a little fishy. Not quite as bad as POD or other arcarde games > but not as accurate as GP2 or N2. Anybody else?
The demo was off my HD with-in 30 minutes. It really only took that long to "feel" how shallow it was. The graphics where fine. Nice shadding and the pit was detailed nicely but it seemed to have that "arcadish" feel to it. Plus the replay was horrible. it had a "studder" to it, I would'nt say choppy, but it hung badly every 3 or 4 frames(pent166). The menu system was horrible and it took me awhile to get the controls to work. IMO, it wasnt the "next best thing". Not to mention the cars looked nothing like the "future" at least I hope it doesnt come to that!! They were more like, well....turds! The 3D art department needs work in this area. Of course it is a "beta" and hopefully they will spend alot more time "streamling" it.(especially the cars) -David Gary-
>Regarding the physics model, you hit the nail right on the head. That >is exactly how I felt about it, not sure how accurate it is since the >cars are all 'experimental'. I thought overall the cars could be >slowed to easily, and the cornering was inconsistent. To be honest I surprised myself and quite enjoyed it. Certainly it's still on my hard disk, and I think we owe it to Bethesda to at least take a little time and give it a proper test run. The only thing that's sure is that if we simply tell them "It stinks!!" without anything to say WHY it stinks, you can bet the release version will stink most horribly. IMO it certainly doesn't stink. There seems to be a lack of interaction between the gas/brakes and the downforce/steering. I have so far failed to find any sort of feedback or warning from the car as to when it's about to spin. I would expect some shift in the***pit view, tyre squeal, something of that nature. Secondly there seems no middle ground between "driving on rails" and "totally sideways". The car just suddenly seems out of control. The cornering seems very unrealistic, the car just hangs on and can whip around bends that an F1 car would have trouble negotiating. The FEEL of having the car balanced on the edge isn't there. Braking and accelerating seem not too bad (except the aforementioned problem of no interaction between steering and brakes during turn-in). Overall the game just seem too close to "arcade", even with total realism turned on. I can now turn regular 1:05 - 1:06 laps at Mid-Ohio with little feeling of pushing the car at all, and utterly thrash the opposition on highest difficulty. Now I'm FAR from the best driver around here so that needs attention for a start :-) Other things.... The HUD needs refined or lost completely, too big and unecessary. The interior graphics need to look a lot more spectacular, as do the other cars. The scenery is nice though and I kinda liked the bird that flew over :-) A little bit of immersion. The other annoying feature was no support for two joystick based control. The AI seemed a bit lame, more like people to get in your way than worthy of racing. Perhaps this would be improved with more speed. Overall I would say the game has more good things going for it than bad, and has potential. If that is an "almost finished" version then I would pronounce myself a bit disappointed. If it is a "working model ready for polishing" then it looks good, with work it has the makings of a good racer. In current form I wouldn't buy itthough. Cheers! John

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy