Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

I will wait for the CPR sim to BE CORRECTED -- then consider it!

5 posts by 4 people · 19 Dec 1997 - 20 Dec 1997

Image-inati 19 Dec 1997#388252
I just heard on the radio that the Justice Department is a little miffed about MICROSOFT'S unusual way of "attempting" to comply with the recommendations of the federal injunction against them. It seems that when they DID take the IE off the Windows 95 and associated software, the consumer got what was esentially a worthless piece of junk! BOY ------- DOES THIS SOUND FAMILIAR!!!!!!!!!!! LOL In a previous post, I read that a person bought CPR under the hopes that MS will improve the product and release the updates for it in time. Well ----------- it seems to me that if MS is so damned HEADSTRONG that they would release such a piece of software --- regards to the federal action pending --------- DO YOU HONESTLY THINK THEY ARE GOING TO BREAK THEIR NECKS TO HELP US MERE MORTALS OUT!!! ????????? I am going to wait until it IS corrected and running properly ---------- THEN decide ---------------- how much you wanna bet I WAIT FOR A ------------- L O N G TIME!!!!!!!!!!
Randy BO 19 Dec 1997#388253
Piece of friendly advice for you: don't try to compare CPR with IE4 and the Justice Department stuff. The issues are entirely separate. Microsoft is fighting a war to determine what the future of desktop computing will be, and the Justice Department is trying to ensure that Microsoft cannot leverage its near-monopoly on Windows 95 to determine that future. There is no such situation with CPR. Its a GAME. It does not threaten Ubisoft or any other company on a less than level playing field. About the only advantage Microsoft has with CPR is its marketing muscle and ability to pay whatever amount for a CART license or any other license it needs. As for the software itself, I think its pretty clear MS isn't gaining any significant advantage here for being Microsoft (one might say that they are at a disadvantage if they ARE using newer cutting edge features in D3D because they managed to somehow expose D3D problems in CERTIFIED DRIVERS that other games don't have!) Randy Randy Magruder Staff Writer Digital Sportspage http://www.digitalsports.com/
> I just heard on the radio that the Justice Department is a little > miffed about MICROSOFT'S unusual way of "attempting" to comply with > the recommendations of the federal injunction against them. <Snip> You seem to have the idea that MS is CPR, dont lose sight of the fact that CART is TRI's baby and it is they who are doing all the work of making it right, this first patch improved the sim a BUNCH :)! Trev
blah, blah, MS sucks, blah, blah, blah... I'm not quite as jaded as you are towards Microsoft but I, too will wait for a few patches before considering the purchase of CPR. I'm not really expecting a lot from a driving game, only that it be driveable. Even a game like Carmageddon is driveable, in that the car goes where you steer it. I was really disappointed with the CPR demo. It was almost but not quite as bad as the X-Car demo, IMO. The worst driving game I've tried in the past year or so was Power F1 (wow, what a stinker!). Eidos released a joystick patch but it never felt driveable with a T2, IMO. The next worst driving game was Formula 1 by Psygnosis. The graphics are nice and it's fun with a MS Sidewinder game pad. However, the AI is really, really bad, the control is terrible with a T2 and the menu system just plain sucks. I won't go on but needless to say, I've tried and owned (unfortunately) many terrible driving games in the past year. However, since I've been reading posts on the RAS the past seven or eight months, I've been clued-in to what's decent and what sucks. A few driving games that I find cool, driveable, worthy of their purchase price and existance on my computer are: 1. GPII 2. N2 3. F1RS (my current personal favorite) 4. NFS2SE 5. Screamer 2 (but only after the 3Dfx patch was released) 6. Pod 7. Carmageddon and 8. MTM. With the exception of GPII and Pod, these games are allowed to live on my computer. A person might wonder how in the world a game like Carmageddon could be considered better than CPR? I can only be honest and say that I'll be going to buy the Splat Pack today and won't even look at the CPR box. That is, until the patch is released.;-) Later, Buddha
Quoted text (29 lines)> blah, blah, MS sucks, blah, blah, blah... > I'm not quite as jaded as you are towards Microsoft but I, too will wait > for a few patches before considering the purchase of CPR. I'm not really > expecting a lot from a driving game, only that it be driveable. Even a > game like Carmageddon is driveable, in that the car goes where you steer > it. I was really disappointed with the CPR demo. It was almost but not > quite as bad as the X-Car demo, IMO. The worst driving game I've tried > in the past year or so was Power F1 (wow, what a stinker!). Eidos > released a joystick patch but it never felt driveable with a T2, IMO. > The next worst driving game was Formula 1 by Psygnosis. The graphics are > nice and it's fun with a MS Sidewinder game pad. However, the AI is > really, really bad, the control is terrible with a T2 and the menu > system just plain sucks. I won't go on but needless to say, I've tried > and owned (unfortunately) many terrible driving games in the past year. > However, since I've been reading posts on the RAS the past seven or > eight months, I've been clued-in to what's decent and what sucks. > A few driving games that I find cool, driveable, worthy of their > purchase price and existance on my computer are: 1. GPII 2. N2 3. F1RS > (my current personal favorite) 4. NFS2SE 5. Screamer 2 (but only after > the 3Dfx patch was released) 6. Pod 7. Carmageddon and 8. MTM. With the > exception of GPII and Pod, these games are allowed to live on my > computer. > A person might wonder how in the world a game like Carmageddon could be > considered better than CPR? I can only be honest and say that I'll be > going to buy the Splat Pack today and won't even look at the CPR box. > That is, until the patch is released.;-) > Later, > Buddha
Oops, I lied.:-) I found a used copy of CPR at Interact for $30 while there to buy the Splat Pack. I figured "what the heck." The patch is being beta tested, the Act Labs RS force-feedback wheel is supposed to be released next year and I'll need something besides NFS2SE to drive it with. That is, until the force-feedback patch is released for F1RS. Later, Buddha

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy