Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

MONACO in GPL -maybe

7 posts by 6 people · 01 Jun 1998 - 06 Jun 1998

s.. 01 Jun 1998#409973
During the E3 I went to see the Sierra both and talked to one of the Sierra guys who was showing GPL. When I asked him whether GPL would feature Monaco he told me that they haven't decided yet because Sierra needs yet to sign a contract with Monaco. However, he told me that the track is done and that he drove it and it looks just awesome. It would be a big loss if Sierra wouldn't be able to reach an agreement with the city of Monaco or whoever is responsible for issuing the track rights. I also was able to play parts of the Nuernburg ring (22.5 kilometers!!!) it's still not done yet but it will look great! Also, No weather changes will be included in the final game as well due to time constraints. He told me that GPL is under development since 3 years and that they have pressure to bring it to the market. There will be no force-feedback as well because accroding to Sierra its not realistic enough. Other tracks I saw were: Kyalami South Africa Ruen France Spa Belgium Zandvoort Netherlands Nuerenberg Germany Watkins Glen USA Monza Italy There may be more but I can't recall Andy
Tilus 01 Jun 1998#409974
Cool , but we have to have Monaco in the final game !!! and how about the ferrari`s?
"We have to have"? I think not....they have already obtained the two "must have" circuits :o)
Quoted text (17 lines)> >During the E3 I went to see the Sierra both and talked to one of the Sierra > guys who > >was showing GPL. When I asked him whether GPL would feature Monaco he told > me that > >they haven't decided yet because Sierra needs yet to sign a contract with > Monaco. > >However, he told me that the track is done and that he drove it and it > looks just > >awesome. It would be a big loss if Sierra wouldn't be able to reach an > agreement with > >the city of Monaco or whoever is responsible for issuing the track rights. > >I also was able to play parts of the Nuernburg ring (22.5 kilometers!!!) > it's still > >not done yet but it will look great! > Cool , but we have to have Monaco in the final game !!! > and how about the ferrari`s?
-- Regards, Bruce. ---------- The GP Legends Historic Motor Racing Club is located at:- http://www.netspeed.com.au/brucek/legends/
Without Monaco, the sim is simply NOT representative of the spirit of that time in racing. -- mark "A lot of people think racing is about going fast. But it's not. It's about going just slow enough to stay on the track." F1RS - http://www.nmia.com/~chaser/car/results.htm Remove us here and there to mail me. "We have to have"? I think not....they have already obtained the two "must have" circuits :o) > > >During the E3 I went to see the Sierra both and talked to one of the Sierra > guys who > >was showing GPL. When I asked him whether GPL would feature Monaco he told > me that > >they haven't decided yet because Sierra needs yet to sign a contract with > Monaco. > >However, he told me that the track is done and that he drove it and it > looks just > >awesome. It would be a big loss if Sierra wouldn't be able to reach an > agreement with > >the city of Monaco or whoever is responsible for issuing the track rights. > >I also was able to play parts of the Nuernburg ring (22.5 kilometers!!!) > it's still > >not done yet but it will look great! > > Cool , but we have to have Monaco in the final game !!! > and how about the ferrari`s? -- Regards, Bruce. ---------- The GP Legends Historic Motor Racing Club is located at:- http://www.netspeed.com.au/brucek/legends/
Remember, at that time, the Monaco circuit was even more heavily displaced than today! I mean, today, all the circuits have elements from Monaco (one real slow section with a couple of chicanes etc...), in 1967 they used faster tracks than the present (in comparison to the cars, that is) and Monaco was as twisted as it is today. But somehow the Monaco circuit has always had a special place in racing, and even more so in the past, perhaps because the atmosphere at Monaco was more in line with the racing attitude at the time? I'm not entirely sure if I would select the Monaco circuit or the Brands Hatch circuit... ---Asgeir---
Quoted text (52 lines)> Without Monaco, the sim is simply NOT representative of the spirit of > that time in racing. > -- > mark > "A lot of people think racing is about going fast. But it's not. It's > about going just slow enough to stay on the track." F1RS - > http://www.nmia.com/~chaser/car/results.htm > Remove us here and there to mail me. > I think not....they have already obtained the two "must > have" circuits > :o) > > >During the E3 I went to see the Sierra both and talked to > one of the Sierra > > guys who > > >was showing GPL. When I asked him whether GPL would > feature Monaco he told > > me that > > >they haven't decided yet because Sierra needs yet to sign > a contract with > > Monaco. > > >However, he told me that the track is done and that he > drove it and it > > looks just > > >awesome. It would be a big loss if Sierra wouldn't be > able to reach an > > agreement with > > >the city of Monaco or whoever is responsible for issuing > the track rights. > > >I also was able to play parts of the Nuernburg ring (22.5 > kilometers!!!) > > it's still > > >not done yet but it will look great! > > Cool , but we have to have Monaco in the final game !!! > > and how about the ferrari`s? > -- > Regards, > Bruce. > ---------- > The GP Legends Historic Motor Racing Club is located at:- > http://www.netspeed.com.au/brucek/legends/
On Thu, 4 Jun 1998 00:47:32 -0600, "mark jeangerard" >Without Monaco, the sim is simply NOT representative of the spirit of that time in racing. I never thought of Monaco as the raison d'etre of Formula 1 at that time nor any other. That's the sort of sweeping generalisation that gives this group a bad name. Nurburgring is representative, Spa is representative, Monaco is just Monaco. The former you won't see in any Cheers! John
You're right. Let me rephrase that: Without Monaco, the sim is simply NOT representative of the world view of the spirit of racing in that time. (Not from the racers perspective. I'm sure the teams abhorred racing in Monaco.) Living in the artistically desolate USA, I can tell you that the vision of the grand prix at Monaco is the *only* evidence of Formula 1 that many middle Americans have seen. (Middle being not Canada, not Mexico, not South America.) Monaco will roll off the tongue most of us before Long Beach or Watkins Glen or Phoenix. Why? Because of the spirit of the event. In those years Monaco got the publicity to be televised over here when other events didn't. Personally, and I'm willing to bet a lot of others feel this way, Monaco has a special place in my heart. The ***, harbor, and the charge up the hill past Rose's are forever embedded in my memory. Many times, when Formula 1 becomes the subject, my first thought is Monaco. Loews, Portier, and Ste. Devote are some of the most famous names in the world. Go figure. Now I have raced enough to know that if Ron came to me today and said, "You've won! You get two hours in the seat, pick a track." Spa! Spa! Spa! Then many other tracks before Monaco. But if the same offer were to be a spectator... Monaco. Finally, I think you know full well what I meant. While I'd hate to dissuade you from asking, just in case you aren't clear on my ideas, I really do take offense at the line "That's the sort of sweeping generalization that gives this group a bad name." First of all, I hope most people will read any post and say "hmm". That's all. No epiphanies. Just information. Second, I've never heard one single person ever say, "You know. That r.a.s. has too many lunkheads exchanging ideas without editing. What am I supposed to do? Try to understand the posts? I don't think I'll go back." -- Cheers back at ya! mark "A lot of people think racing is about going fast. But it's not. It's about going just slow enough to stay on the track." F1RS - http://www.nmia.com/~chaser/car/results.htm Remove us here and there to mail me. On Thu, 4 Jun 1998 00:47:32 -0600, "mark jeangerard" >Without Monaco, the sim is simply NOT representative of the spirit of that time in racing. I never thought of Monaco as the raison d'etre of Formula 1 at that time nor any other. That's the sort of sweeping generalisation that gives this group a bad name. Nurburgring is representative, Spa is representative, Monaco is just Monaco. The former you won't see in any Cheers! John

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy