Any word yet on OGL support (patch?) for OGL in NR2003? Is there an OGL
version that works better for NR2003 in the works?
I hate the way the D3D rasterizer "page flips" the mip levels....it causes
too dang much flashing! OGL blends them, you don't get all that crappy
flashing (which also tends to make the jaggies look worse than they really
are)!
Just wondering........
TP
Tom,
Funny you should mention that. Once I started running GPL in OGL, I've
never given D3D a second thought. But with N2003 it's the exact opposite.
And in D3D the jaggies are driving me crazy.
Joel
--
"If you can leave black marks on a straight from the time you exit a corner
till the time you brake for the next turn
, then you have enough horsepower."
Mark Donohue
"Tom Pabst" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:%9_ma.496267$[email hidden]...
> Any word yet on OGL support (patch?) for OGL in NR2003? Is there an OGL
> version that works better for NR2003 in the works?
>
> I hate the way the D3D rasterizer "page flips" the mip levels....it causes
> too dang much flashing! OGL blends them, you don't get all that crappy
> flashing (which also tends to make the jaggies look worse than they really
> are)!
>
> Just wondering........
>
> TP
>
>
Joel!!!! How you doing bud? Drop me a line sometime or check out the new
site.
Mike Horton
GSCL Admin
http://www.cta-racing.com/gscl
"Joel A. Willstein" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:Yw_ma.10152$[email hidden]...
> Tom,
>
> Funny you should mention that. Once I started running GPL in OGL,I've
> never given D3D a second thought. But with N2003 it's the exact opposite.
> And in D3D the jaggies are driving me crazy.
>
> Joel
>
> --
Quoted text (7 lines)
>Any word yet on OGL support (patch?) for OGL in NR2003? Is there an OGL >version that works better for NR2003 in the works? > >I hate the way the D3D rasterizer "page flips" the mip levels....it causes >too dang much flashing! OGL blends them, you don't get all that crappy >flashing (which also tends to make the jaggies look worse than they really >are)!I've been using it since day one. No problems here.
Larry
"Tom Pabst" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:%9_ma.496267$[email hidden]...


































