rec.autos.simulators

by **andre** » Sun, 25 Mar 2001 05:54:52

"graphic method"

what would you think they do?

by **Ruud van Ga** » Sun, 25 Mar 2001 06:39:14

>"graphic method"

>what would you think they do?

Think the whole day about just a better name. ;-)

And if they were serious, they would be designing graphical
interfaces. My guess. Geez, what the hell am I doing here. Back to
work. :)

Ruud van Gaal, GPL Rank +53.25
Pencil art : http://www.marketgraph.nl/gallery/
Free car sim : http://www.marketgraph.nl/gallery/racer/

by **Gerry Aitke** » Sun, 25 Mar 2001 10:55:36

> "graphic method"

> what would you think they do?

***ers?

Gerry

by **John Zumste** » Sun, 25 Mar 2001 12:55:47

Reminds me of a software company that sent me a response to a request
for information once; it was named "Resonant Mass." Never did figure out
what that meant, and I was afraid to ask.

> "graphic method"

> what would you think they do?

by **Jan Loebzie** » Sun, 25 Mar 2001 13:54:59

>"graphic method"

>what would you think they do?

I would think that they are spamming newsgroups with
offtopic, amateurish marketing research questions.

by **Tim** » Sun, 25 Mar 2001 23:59:06

>"graphic method"

>what would you think they do?

Go out of business in less than a month.

Tim

by **andre** » Sun, 25 Mar 2001 22:11:45

you'd be thinking wrong, then.

sorry if I offended you tender sensibilities.

> >"graphic method"

> >what would you think they do?

> I would think that they are spamming newsgroups with
> offtopic, amateurish marketing research questions.

by **Jan Verschuere** » Sun, 25 Mar 2001 22:44:21

Professional painting by numbers? ;-)

Jan./ Sorry for the pun, but is this leading anywhere?
=---

by **andre** » Sun, 25 Mar 2001 23:20:28

> Professional painting by numbers? ;-)

lol

I don't know!

by **use EXCITE.COM instead** » Mon, 26 Mar 2001 05:50:47

*** is a distinct possibility.

--KC

by **Klin** » Mon, 26 Mar 2001 05:54:14

"Physics", no doubt.

> "graphic method"

> what would you think they do?

by **andre** » Mon, 26 Mar 2001 07:09:39

Wow, I haven't been around this newsgroup for a while...

I remember back when that was almost as pervasive as "all your base are belong
to us"....

> "Physics", no doubt.

> > "graphic method"

> > what would you think they do?

by **Wosc** » Mon, 26 Mar 2001 08:31:39

How would he be thinking wrong? Is your message on topic? Are you not
asking for an opinion on a company name so you can find out what people
would think of it? It sounds like Jan hit this one on the head.

JB

> you'd be thinking wrong, then.

> sorry if I offended you tender sensibilities.

> > >"graphic method"

> > >what would you think they do?

> > I would think that they are spamming newsgroups with
> > offtopic, amateurish marketing research questions.

by **andre** » Mon, 26 Mar 2001 08:29:48

He is thinking wrong, because he is wrong.

Simple, huh?

I didn't ask for an opinion of the name. You need to read more carefully.

I used to read and post here a lot, by the way. I don't remember seeing your
name.

> How would he be thinking wrong? Is your message on topic? Are you not
> asking for an opinion on a company name so you can find out what people
> would think of it? It sounds like Jan hit this one on the head.

> JB

> > you'd be thinking wrong, then.

> > sorry if I offended you tender sensibilities.

> > > >"graphic method"

> > > >what would you think they do?

> > > I would think that they are spamming newsgroups with
> > > offtopic, amateurish marketing research questions.

by **Wosc** » Tue, 27 Mar 2001 02:36:20

Wait wait...so veterans of this newsgroup are allowed to post way off-topic
messages? And I have posted to this group many times. I've been here for 2
or 3 years now. You keep telling people that they are wrong, how bout you
tell us what the reason for your off-topic post was? If we are so wrong,
correct us.

JB

> He is thinking wrong, because he is wrong.

> Simple, huh?

> I didn't ask for an opinion of the name. You need to read more carefully.

> I used to read and post here a lot, by the way. I don't remember seeing
your
> name.

> > How would he be thinking wrong? Is your message on topic? Are you not
> > asking for an opinion on a company name so you can find out what people
> > would think of it? It sounds like Jan hit this one on the head.

> > JB

- Show quoted text -

> > > you'd be thinking wrong, then.

> > > sorry if I offended you tender sensibilities.

> > > > >"graphic method"

> > > > >what would you think they do?

> > > > I would think that they are spamming newsgroups with
> > > > offtopic, amateurish marketing research questions.

rec.autos.simulators

If you saw a company called...

If you saw a company called...

If you saw a company called...

If you saw a company called...

If you saw a company called...

If you saw a company called...

If you saw a company called...

If you saw a company called...

If you saw a company called...

If you saw a company called...

If you saw a company called...

If you saw a company called...

If you saw a company called...

If you saw a company called...

If you saw a company called...

If you saw a company called...