Doh, i just wanna say thank *** gp2 looks like its gonne be here
finally. I have been so desperate i resorted to indycar 2 the other
day, shite. I hope sooo much that MPS will incorporate power oversteer
and correct tracition calculation as ICR2 was hopeless at simulating
this. Any1 got any ideas of the GP2 car handling??? Hey lets pass the
time quicker by preparing ourselves for the new car :?)
Alan
ICR2 handling versus GP2 expectations, then F1 vs IndyCar
A poster who claimed real single-seater experience called ICR2's handling laughable and hoped GP2 would model power oversteer better, prompting replies that he simply could not drive it. A beta tester described GP2's throttle help and the need to feather the throttle. The thread drifted into a long off-topic argument comparing F1 and IndyCar drivers such as Hill, Mansell and Villeneuve.
Automated summary.
>Doh, i just wanna say thank *** gp2 looks like its gonne be here
>finally. I have been so desperate i resorted to indycar 2 the other
>day, shite.
God, No! It must have been a difficult condescent.
(american Translation: he couldn't keep it on the track.)
Ya, I'm sure GP2 will have many more ways that ICR2 to make racecar
driving seem easy for those not really interested in a sim.
The question is, with all of it's bells and whistles, can GP2 still
match ICR2 in being a real sim? I'm hoping so.
Quoted text (22 lines)
>>Doh, i just wanna say thank *** gp2 looks like its gonne be here >>finally. I have been so desperate i resorted to indycar 2 the other >>day, shite. >God, No! It must have been a difficult condescent. >>I hope sooo much that MPS will incorporate power oversteer >>and correct tracition calculation as ICR2 was hopeless at simulating >>this. >(american Translation: he couldn't keep it on the track.) >Ya, I'm sure GP2 will have many more ways that ICR2 to make racecar >driving seem easy for those not really interested in a sim. >The question is, with all of it's bells and whistles, can GP2 still >match ICR2 in being a real sim? I'm hoping so. >> Any1 got any ideas of the GP2 car handling??? Hey lets pass the >>time quicker by preparing ourselves for the new car :?) >>Alan[snip!]
:Oi, the American translation***is not amusing: IF you feel that ICR2
:is somin as a landmark for Sims then you are obviously a poor driver
:yourself. I have driven single seaters and high powered sports cars in
Judging by the quality and richness of language you have used in your
arguments, I didn't know nurseries allowed the kids near such big
toys.
:competition and find ICR2 laaaarfable. So enough o the smarmy Yank
:shit coz at the end of the day i have never seen a 800bhp car keep
:traction on a bend under full throttle at mid speed so what the hell
:on about? It wasn't that i couyldn't control the thing it was just
:understeer/crap. Yes i am using a T2 and i have managed 8th quickest
Have you ever thought of practising?
:at imloa in MPS Gp racing series on internet so i know what im doin.
:Up yours,
SA or NSA? If it's SA, what are you doing complaining about, with
F1GP's tramlines keeping the car on the racing line. If it's NSA, then
that's barely realistic either, and to complain about ICR2 being
uncontrolable when NSA steering is an order of magnitude harder than
ICR2 is a bit rich. And yes, I have raced F1GP for a season and a half
NSA, and was in the top 6 NSA hotlaps at most tracks on the Compuserve
league last season.
:
:And by the way if you are American, take another look, most indycar
:drivers would be pissin in the wind competing in F1 (bar JV who is
:cool, more French than Canadian)
:
:ALan. (Reply to ma thread and i will be happy to wop your Ass over
^^^^
Are you really he? From your headers:
> NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup-03-59.netcomuk.co.uk
Hmmm... I am always wary of posters with fake headers.
:Indycar/F1gp with Kali ok sunshine?
Do you know something no-one else does? Neither work, although I heard
ICR2 for Win95 has/will have IPX support.
Ken
Quoted text (7 lines)
> Doh, i just wanna say thank *** gp2 looks like its gonne be here > finally. I have been so desperate i resorted to indycar 2 the other > day, shite. I hope sooo much that MPS will incorporate power oversteer > and correct tracition calculation as ICR2 was hopeless at simulating > this. Any1 got any ideas of the GP2 car handling??? Hey lets pass the > time quicker by preparing ourselves for the new car :?) > AlanFrom a beta version I can say that there is another helper (F7) that is called
throttle help. It more or less saves you from wicked oversteer. When I first
played GP2, I could not believe the amount of power the car actually has. You
actually have to feather the throttle out of 1st and 2nd gear corners or
around you go !!!
This is a fantastic sim and I totally recommend a wheel/pedel combo. The
engine sounds are unbelievable especially when you downshift and the frame
rate on my 686-100 is >25fps in VGA. Add cars and it slows it down (140%
occupancy) but still playable.
Quoted text (38 lines)
>>>Doh, i just wanna say thank *** gp2 looks like its gonne be here >>>finally. I have been so desperate i resorted to indycar 2 the other >>>day, shite. >>God, No! It must have been a difficult condescent. >>>I hope sooo much that MPS will incorporate power oversteer >>>and correct tracition calculation as ICR2 was hopeless at simulating >>>this. >>(american Translation: he couldn't keep it on the track.) >>Ya, I'm sure GP2 will have many more ways that ICR2 to make racecar >>driving seem easy for those not really interested in a sim. >>The question is, with all of it's bells and whistles, can GP2 still >>match ICR2 in being a real sim? I'm hoping so. >>> Any1 got any ideas of the GP2 car handling??? Hey lets pass the >>>time quicker by preparing ourselves for the new car :?) >>>Alan >Oi, the American translation***is not amusing: IF you feel that ICR2 >is somin as a landmark for Sims then you are obviously a poor driver >yourself. I have driven single seaters and high powered sports cars in >competition and find ICR2 laaaarfable. So enough o the smarmy Yank >shit coz at the end of the day i have never seen a 800bhp car keep >traction on a bend under full throttle at mid speed so what the hell >on about? It wasn't that i couyldn't control the thing it was just >understeer/crap. Yes i am using a T2 and i have managed 8th quickest >at imloa in MPS Gp racing series on internet so i know what im doin. >Up yours, >And by the way if you are American, take another look, most indycar >drivers would be pissin in the wind competing in F1 (bar JV who is >cool, more French than Canadian) >ALan. (Reply to ma thread and i will be happy to wop your Ass over >Indycar/F1gp with Kali ok sunshine?Cyrix chip i take it?
have you tried svga mode, if so how bad is it with all the
objects and rear textures turned off.
Jeff
Quoted text (10 lines)
> > > [snip!] > > > : > :And by the way if you are American, take another look, most indycar > :drivers would be pissin in the wind competing in F1 (bar JV who is > :cool, more French than Canadian) > :Quoted text (10 lines)
> > [snip!] > > > : > > :And by the way if you are American, take another look, most indycar > > :drivers would be pissin in the wind competing in F1 (bar JV who is > > :cool, more French than Canadian) > > : > Oh, yeah, sure. Can you imagine Damon Hill in the traffic at Nazareth? > Now that is what I call laughable. > RoyQuoted text (10 lines)
> > [snip!] > > > : > > :And by the way if you are American, take another look, most indycar > > :drivers would be pissin in the wind competing in F1 (bar JV who is > > :cool, more French than Canadian) > > : > Oh, yeah, sure. Can you imagine Damon Hill in the traffic at Nazareth? > Now that is what I call laughable. > RoyI would imagine he would do about as well as the last english driver to>I would imagine he would have about as much trouble as the last great
>English driver that came over to CART. Remember him, Nigel Mansell,
>first year I believe he was UNDEFEATED on ovals.
Actually I believe your wrong, on the biggest oval of em all Indy500
he choked on a restart and Emmo won...(sorry off topic I know.....
but could'nt resist :-)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
MP
Scurvydog #00 Simpson-Cowlings Motorsports
http://www.netcom.com/~svydog/scms/index.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Quoted text (9 lines)
> > > > > > > > > > > [snip!] > > > > > > > : > > > :And by the way if you are American, take another look, mostQuoted text (13 lines)
>> > [snip!] >> > > : >> > :And by the way if you are American, take another look, most indycar >> > :drivers would be pissin in the wind competing in F1 (bar JV who is >> > :cool, more French than Canadian) >> > : >> Oh, yeah, sure. Can you imagine Damon Hill in the traffic at Nazareth? >> Now that is what I call laughable. >> RoyI would imagine he would do about as well as the last english driver to >make the jump over to CART. Nigel Mansell, remember him, I believe he >was 5 out of 6 on ovals that first year. Real laughable, if you're >english.Quoted text (13 lines)
> = > > Doh, i just wanna say thank *** gp2 looks like its gonne be here > > finally. I have been so desperate i resorted to indycar 2 the other > > day, shite. I hope sooo much that MPS will incorporate power oversteer > > and correct tracition calculation as ICR2 was hopeless at simulating > > this. Any1 got any ideas of the GP2 car handling??? Hey lets pass the > > time quicker by preparing ourselves for the new car :=AC) > = > > Alan > = > did someone tell ya you just can't drive??? instead of finding a new > wagon.. just learn to drive the darn thing!: I would imagine he would have about as much trouble as the last great
: English driver that came over to CART. Remember him, Nigel Mansell,
: first year I believe he was UNDEFEATED on ovals.
But look what driving Indycars did to him. He couldn't even fit into an
F1 car afterwards, let alone drive one.
For the humor-impaired -- It's a Joke, son, it's a joke!
--
**************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./. [- < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
And how did he win Phoenix from his hospital bed? I also don't remember
his picture on the Borg-Warner trophy.
--
| Dave Vollman
Cogito, ergo stipendium | Lucent Technologies, Naperville, IL
| Lucent would never let ME speak for THEM!
Actually if Schumi was driving a Williams and only won by half a lap I
would think he MUST have had a mechanical failure. Schumi in a
Wiliams...?!? Brrrrr! That would be scary.
_________________________________
__ _____| |_____ __
_________| |__| :| John Wallace | |__| |_________
\ :| |::| :| Team WW Racing TSW | |::| | /
> :| |::| :|_________________________________| |::| | < / :|__|::|____:/ Sim Racing News \.____|::|__| \
/_______:/ \::/ http://sneezy.dcn.ed.ac.uk/simnews/index.htm\::/ \._______\
Quoted text (12 lines)
>> > [snip!] >> > :And by the way if you are American, take another look, most indycar >> > :drivers would be pissin in the wind competing in F1 (bar JV who is >> > :cool, more French than Canadian) >> > : >> Oh, yeah, sure. Can you imagine Damon Hill in the traffic at Nazareth? >> Now that is what I call laughable. >I would imagine he would have about as much trouble as the last great >English driver that came over to CART. Remember him, Nigel Mansell, >first year I believe he was UNDEFEATED on ovals.Quoted text (23 lines)
> >> > [snip!] > >> > :And by the way if you are American, take another look, most indycar > >> > :drivers would be pissin in the wind competing in F1 (bar JV who is > >> > :cool, more French than Canadian) > >> > : > >> Oh, yeah, sure. Can you imagine Damon Hill in the traffic at Nazareth? > >> Now that is what I call laughable. > >I would imagine he would have about as much trouble as the last great > >English driver that came over to CART. Remember him, Nigel Mansell, > >first year I believe he was UNDEFEATED on ovals. > Yeah, but Nige never had difficulties in handling traffic. Damon Hill does, > and on a short oval, he'd be surrounded in traffic. > -- > +------------------+--------------------------------------------+ > | G. Warren Abao | Official BBL Jacksonville Jaguars Website: | > +------------------++------------------------+------------------+ > | SPOOOOOOOOOOON!!! | BBL Jacksonville 9-7 | IFL Chicago 9-6 | > +-------------------+------------------------+------------------+Since every one here is crazy think about this.>Imagine Aryton driving a big fat Indycar? he would never have done it.
>The best Drivers drive the most DRIVABLE car ie F1. Indycars are ok but
>they are not the same as F1 and should not be compared.
Yeah, right.... I'll take Villeneuve in a '96 Reynard Honda with Firestone
tires over any other F1 driver in a '96 F1 car. Let's see, how about running
a race on a 'neutral' track that neither series currently runs on, such as
Indiannapolis Motor Speedway. Yeah, those F1 cars will show just how fast
they really are.
Besides, it looks like there are only 2-3 'best' drivers in F1 and everyone
else might as well not show up for 90% of the races.
Clark
Tired of the snobbish attitude of some F1 fans (and I actually LIKE Formula 1)
> Besides, it looks like there are only 2-3 'best' drivers in F1 and everyone
> else might as well not show up for 90% of the races.
> Clark
Hi there,
In F1, it may look like there is only 2-3 best drivers but it
is not the case, not in my mind anyway... It is more like
there is so much of a gap between the best teams and the good
team, the good team and the average team. So the poor guys
driving a Forti might be as good as Hill in his William but
we'll never know because he cannot create miracle with a
Forti, and will alwaus stay in shadow. Take the Jordan not
far from McLaren, Ferrari and maybe William with their
Peugeot engine but there is a major gap comparing chassi with
the last three.
See my point.
In Indycar most cars are pretty much the same, now setup will
play a big role on oval and drivers on road course but the
cars stay the same (almost).
Yves
>Imagine Aryton driving a big fat Indycar? he would never have done it.
>The best Drivers drive the most DRIVABLE car ie F1. Indycars are ok but
>they are not the same as F1 and should not be compared.
Would have been interesting to see Senna at Indianapolis 500......
Craig
Quoted text (20 lines)
>> >> Besides, it looks like there are only 2-3 'best' drivers in F1 and everyone >> else might as well not show up for 90% of the races. >> >> Clark > >Hi there, > >In F1, it may look like there is only 2-3 best drivers but it >is not the case, not in my mind anyway... It is more like >there is so much of a gap between the best teams and the good >team, the good team and the average team. So the poor guys >driving a Forti might be as good as Hill in his William but >we'll never know because he cannot create miracle with a >Forti, and will alwaus stay in shadow. Take the Jordan not >far from McLaren, Ferrari and maybe William with their >Peugeot engine but there is a major gap comparing chassi with >the last three. > >See my point.Hey, *great* logic. Like Indiannapolis is neutral - you get a lot of
200+mph ovals in F1 <g>
Why not use Donnington or Brands hatch or numerous other F1 circuits
that aren't being used this year?
Actually, can we just drop this thread please - it's off topic &
doesn't belong here. Can't we all just accept that the best F1 drivers
and the best Indy drivers are ***y brilliant, but not necessarily
comparable (just as the best American Footballers are not the best
Rugby players & vice versa).
Follow ups to alt.flame.get.a.life
Richard
F1 cars are nimble rather than built for all out brute force speed - the
same parallels can be drawn between European and US road and performance
cars. A race on IMS would be a totally unfair comparison. Perhaps
comparing the 1000hp+ turbo F1 cars of years gone by on IMS?
Then try putting an F1 car around Laguna Seca - I doubt an Indycar could
keep up through the twists. They're different formulae for different
things and thus impossible to compare. A Lancia Integrale would be both
of them through a special stage - by a LONG way :)
The only thing you can compare are drivers, and even then it's pure
conjecture and blinkered favouritism (in my case at least!) :)
Cheers!
John
_________________________________
__ _____| |_____ __
________| |__| :| John Wallace | |__| |________
\ :| |::| :| Team WW Racing TSW | |::| | /
> :| |::| :|_________________________________| |::| | < / :|__|::|____/ * Sim Racing News * \____|::|__| \
/______:/ \::/ http://sneezy.dcn.ed.ac.uk/simnews/index.htm \::/ \._____\
http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~harmon/simnews
I think you maybe being a little over generous to Zanardi. The driver is
enormously important in F1, as can be seen from the astronomical
salaries teams were/are prepared to pay for exceptional talents such as
Senna and Schumacher.
Now, let's assume that those team managers know a little more than you
and I about Zanardi's driving ability and racing background - do you
think they would have paid to keep him in F1 if he was that good?
Cheers!
John
_________________________________
__ _____| |_____ __
________| |__| :| John Wallace | |__| |________
\ :| |::| :| Team WW Racing TSW | |::| | /
> :| |::| :|_________________________________| |::| | < / :|__|::|____/ * Sim Racing News * \____|::|__| \
/______:/ \::/ http://sneezy.dcn.ed.ac.uk/simnews/index.htm \::/ \._____\
http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~harmon/simnews
Hi there,
> >It is always interesting to me to watch F1 drivers when they come to IndyCar
> >and vice versa. Take Zanardi for example. He never had the car in F1, but
> >now that he has a decent car and team, he's actually gotten a win (almost
> >two).
....and led more races than anyone else
Actually, at Monza where Johnny Herbert qualified the newer spec Honda in
4th
place, Zanardi qualified higher with the older revision engine than Johnny
had
managed previously.
If it hadn't have been for Zanardi's horrific accident at the Eau Rouge
chicane
at the belgian Grand Prix who knows where Alex would be today ?
Here's hoping we see him in F1 again soon!
Regards,
Broady
Well... Maybe, but sometimes in F1 they overlook great talents... Take
Thierry Boutsen for example... The only guy that could keep up with
Senna in the rain... and even overtake him!!!!
He never had the time to fully get into F1...
Greets,
Tonio
Boutsen was a driver who only drove well when he felt like it, some days
he was great, other days it seemed he just couldn't be bothered.
The only race I really remember between Senna and Boutsen was at
Hungaroring in 1990, but it wasn't wet. Maybe Canada '89 was the race
you are thinking of? I'm not sure, but in that race the fastest lap was
set by Johnathon Palmer in a Tyrrell - I think that gives you some idea
that it was an unusual race!!
- Boutsen passed Senna while Senna went into the pits for slicks
- Senna took the lead again as Boutsen pitted
- Senna built a big lead
- Senna and Boutsen both took on wets again
- Boutsen has a HUGE spin as he makes a mistake at 150mph
- Boutsen back into second as Patrese has undertray damage
- Senna goes out of the race as his engine loses oil, Boutsen inherits
the lead.
At no time was Boutsen anywhere near Senna's pace, and he only won
because Senna dropped out. He certainly didn't keep up with Senna, nor
did he overtake him on the track.
Or did you mean a different race?
Cheers!
John
_________________________________
__ _____| |_____ __
________| |__| :| John Wallace | |__| |________
\ :| |::| :| Team WW Racing TSW | |::| | /
> :| |::| :|_________________________________| |::| | < / :|__|::|____/ * Sim Racing News * \____|::|__| \
/______:/ \::/ http://sneezy.dcn.ed.ac.uk/simnews/index.htm \::/ \._____\
http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~harmon/simnews
> Yeah, right.... I'll take Villeneuve in a '96 Reynard Honda with Firestone
> tires over any other F1 driver in a '96 F1 car. Let's see, how about running
> a race on a 'neutral' track that neither series currently runs on, such as
> Indiannapolis Motor Speedway. Yeah, those F1 cars will show just how fast
> they really are.
Really now, do you actually consider Indianapolis to be a "neutral"
track? That is where "Indy"car design originated from and was the focal
point of their series until this year (and would have continued so except
for the horrid indy/IRL-situation).
If you ever consider contesting an F1 car versus an Indycar on a road
circuit, forget it! The F1 car is much lighter -- therefore more nimble
and better hp/lb ratio -- and more advanced. It wouldn't be a contest.
On an oval it would be a different story, and expectantly so. Here, I
would expect the Indycars to have the home advantage (Formula one cars
are not designed with oval racing in mind), especially on the
superspeedways. But on the 1-mile ovals it may be a little more dicey
(cornering speeds and acceleration would play a bigger factor, which are
both F1 traits/advantages).
Anyway, we could theorize all year on this one. Let's just enjoy both for
what they have to offer. Personaly I think the cream of the crop rises to
join F1 at present, but both series offer their own brand of e***ment!
<<If this is so true, then why doesn't F1 ever want indycars to
race on their tracks? I remember hearing that for Brasil that F1
demanded that Indycars race elsewhere.>>
Actually, that's a sort of "agreement" between the current regimes
of each discipline. IndyCar doesn't race on any road courses or street
circuits in Europe or Asia... just North America and Austrailia.
Nick
______________________________________________________________________
#6 (will he be #28 in '97) & #94 in the *real* quest for the Cup
My home away from home... http://www.mindspring.com/~ntotoro/
______________________________________________________________________
Quoted text (7 lines)
> <<If this is so true, then why doesn't F1 ever want indycars to > race on their tracks? I remember hearing that for Brasil that F1 > demanded that Indycars race elsewhere.>> > Actually, that's a sort of "agreement" between the current regimes > of each discipline. IndyCar doesn't race on any road courses or street > circuits in Europe or Asia... just North America and Austrailia.>If you ever consider contesting an F1 car versus an Indycar on a road
>circuit, forget it! The F1 car is much lighter -- therefore more nimble
>and better hp/lb ratio -- and more advanced. It wouldn't be a contest.
If this is so true, then why doesn't F1 ever want indycars to race on
their tracks? I remember hearing that for Brasil that F1 demanded that
Indycars race elsewhere.
Remember, we would know which is faster simply by track times. But it
would be far more interesting to see them race on a "neutral course",
if one could ever be discovered.
I love both forms of racing; Indycar has ground effects downforce and
more horsepower, F1 has better hp/lb and fancy brakes. It would be
quite a spectacle to see them race at a road course deemed neutral for
both- can you imagine all the passing on the straights, followed by
the reverse at the ends-of-straights? It would be thrilling!
Agreed.
It gets very ugly, but it was playable when I overclocked to 120Mhz (P150+).
Depends on the circuit. Monaco=joke, Suzuka=full buntah.
When the full version gets out a P100 gets the nod in SVGA so should be
alright by then.
> Depends on the circuit. Monaco=joke, Suzuka=full buntah.
How about a translation into the Queen's English?
Thanks... :)
Neil
--
Meek and obedient you follow the leader
down well trodden corridors into the valley of steel..
Neil Yeatman, Ajax, Ontario, CANADA
"Full buntah" is a new one on me too, must be an English thing :) I
suppose it means the same as "full Monty", or "everything on".
Monaco is a joke with all detail on (it is too!), and Suzuka is
supersmooth (not so much scenery to shift).
Cheers!
John
PS - Monaco is fine when "toned down" a bit. Unfortunately it just looks
too gorgeous to tone down :)
_________________________________
__ _____| |_____ __
________| |__| :| John Wallace | |__| |________
\ :| |::| :| Team WW Racing TSW | |::| | /
> :| |::| :|_________________________________| |::| | < / :|__|::|____/ * Sim Racing News * \____|::|__| \
/______:/ \::/ http://sneezy.dcn.ed.ac.uk/simnews/index.htm \::/ \._____\
http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~harmon/simnews


































