rec.autos.simulators

The "Future" is here?

Steve Whitt

The "Future" is here?

by Steve Whitt » Mon, 08 Jul 2002 00:39:31


Ain't that the truth.  Maybe one day we'll have a decent sim for the Aussie
v8's

Steve

John Pancoas

The "Future" is here?

by John Pancoas » Sun, 07 Jul 2002 08:24:15




> > Heat has the smarter AI, as far as I'm concerned.

> > NR2002 suffers from "AI that turns left regardless of what's around
them"
> > worse than anything I've ever driven.

> > Try a 43 car race at Texas.  Say.... 20% at 100% strength.  I doubt
you'll
> > survive.

> > -Larry

> You mean NR2002 has AI for offline racing? LOL! :) Didn't know that
feature
> was included...that's the problem with NR2002, there is the faction that
> could care less if there even was an AI and those that think the AI is the
> only way to race it.

  AI programming equals wasted programming <G>

John

- Show quoted text -

John Pancoas

The "Future" is here?

by John Pancoas » Sun, 07 Jul 2002 08:29:34



> >   Agreed Heat wasn't a bad effort, but how many play it now compared to
the
> > Papy sims..................one has excellent multi.........one doesn't.

> As stated in other threads, MP isn't all that important to the majority
> of sim buyers, if it was you'd see a whole lot more people doing pickup
> racing on Sierra/Won/Whatever, we the enthusiasts may think it's
> important, but there's not enough of us to make a difference, if we did
> we'd have GPL2 by now

> Beers and cheers
> (uncle) Goy

> http://www.theuspits.com

> "A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
> --Groucho Marx--

  I know, but fwiw, I've never subscribed to that argument.   Only games
that keep getting played year after year are ones with quality multi.  GPL
is a perfect example.  If it wasn't for VROC, it'd be long dead.
  Or again, how come Heat is dead ?  Most likely, N2002 offline isn't that
much better.

  IMO of course<G>

John

Goy Larse

The "Future" is here?

by Goy Larse » Sun, 07 Jul 2002 08:39:29


>   I know, but fwiw, I've never subscribed to that argument.   Only games
> that keep getting played year after year are ones with quality multi.  GPL
> is a perfect example.  If it wasn't for VROC, it'd be long dead.

It's the fan base keeping it alive, and no wonder since it's an
excellent sim, for the enthusiast, probably less so for Sierra/Vivendi

As for what part keeping it alive, GP2 and GP3 has a lot of fan sites
going, well not so much GP2 anymore probably :-), but I seem to remember
from posts in this forum that they had "less than excellent MP"

Never can tell what gives a game a huge following can you, there are
plenty of stuff going on for NFS Hot Pursuit or whatever it was called,
people painting cars and stuff, Motor City Online on the other hand....,
but then again, it didn't have that good MP either, and no offline play

Heat isn't dead, it's thriving as a matter of fact with new mods popping
up right and left :-), MP Heat is dead though, but then again it was
sort of stillborn wasn't it ?

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy

http://www.theuspits.com

"A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
--Groucho Marx--

JM

The "Future" is here?

by JM » Sun, 07 Jul 2002 08:58:10


As I've mentioned elsewhere, I play heat online with 40 other people on a
weekly basis (not all at once, admittedly 10-12 in each race heats and
final)
It's the mods that make Heat worthwhile.  If N2K2 was moddable, even more
would be playing it, I am sure.

cheers
John

John Pancoas

The "Future" is here?

by John Pancoas » Sun, 07 Jul 2002 09:05:55



> >   I know, but fwiw, I've never subscribed to that argument.   Only games
> > that keep getting played year after year are ones with quality multi.
GPL
> > is a perfect example.  If it wasn't for VROC, it'd be long dead.

> It's the fan base keeping it alive, and no wonder since it's an
> excellent sim, for the enthusiast, probably less so for Sierra/Vivendi

> As for what part keeping it alive, GP2 and GP3 has a lot of fan sites
> going, well not so much GP2 anymore probably :-), but I seem to remember
> from posts in this forum that they had "less than excellent MP"

> Never can tell what gives a game a huge following can you, there are
> plenty of stuff going on for NFS Hot Pursuit or whatever it was called,
> people painting cars and stuff, Motor City Online on the other hand....,
> but then again, it didn't have that good MP either, and no offline play

> >   Or again, how come Heat is dead ?  Most likely, N2002 offline isn't
that
> > much better.

> Heat isn't dead, it's thriving as a matter of fact with new mods popping
> up right and left :-), MP Heat is dead though, but then again it was
> sort of stillborn wasn't it ?

> Beers and cheers
> (uncle) Goy

> http://www.theuspits.com

> "A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
> --Groucho Marx--

  Well, I'll never be convinced otherwise anyway, but who cares :)   I still
believe GPL and it's fanbase would be dead without it's multi ability, and
in terms of Heat, I meant the original stock car version, and it's dead as
Enron stock.

John

JM

The "Future" is here?

by JM » Sun, 07 Jul 2002 08:54:29



Not really, it's like saying Coke put all their eggs into the Cola
business, without considering fizzy orange or fizzy lemonade drinks.  Coke
would still cream the market, but then Papyrus Racing Simulations do not
have their marketing budget!  If EA Sports put a "killer" Nascar game onto
the consoles and PC, then that will affect Sierra's share of the market,
and thus Papyrus' position as developer.  They can't move into fizzy orange
(sports cars) or fizzy lemonade (historic gp sequels) because they only do
cola (nascar) then pepsi come along and papy are out of a job...

;o)

cheers
John

JM

The "Future" is here?

by JM » Sun, 07 Jul 2002 08:51:24


125164.news.dfncis.de:

Yeah, I think Heat's AI run on rails like you say.  Which proabably doesn't
work as well when the idea of the racing formula *isn't* to bump the car in
front off the racing line, but expect him (it) to adjust position
intelligently...

cheers
John

Brian Simpso

The "Future" is here?

by Brian Simpso » Sun, 07 Jul 2002 10:17:36

I think that may be true if the People at Papy are only capable of making
Nascar sims.

As I think they've proven with GPL, if they want I'm sure they can move
easily onto many different forms of drinks.

--
Brian Simpson
Big "O" Boats - www.bigoboats.com
Member Team Lightspeed! - http://www.sportplanet.com/team-lightspeed/




> > If they put all their eggs in one basic with NASCAR then how does that
> > make them vulnerable in the NASCAR sim area??
> > That's like saying Coke put all their eggs into the soda biz and thus
> > are vulnerable to some new soda company that might start up.

> Not really, it's like saying Coke put all their eggs into the Cola
> business, without considering fizzy orange or fizzy lemonade drinks.  Coke
> would still cream the market, but then Papyrus Racing Simulations do not
> have their marketing budget!  If EA Sports put a "killer" Nascar game onto
> the consoles and PC, then that will affect Sierra's share of the market,
> and thus Papyrus' position as developer.  They can't move into fizzy
orange
> (sports cars) or fizzy lemonade (historic gp sequels) because they only do
> cola (nascar) then pepsi come along and papy are out of a job...

> ;o)

> cheers
> John

The Other Larr

The "Future" is here?

by The Other Larr » Sun, 07 Jul 2002 11:46:13

I keep heat around for visitors, who always find it more enjoyable than
NR2002.

-Larry



> > Heat isn't dead, it's thriving as a matter of fact with new mods
> > popping up right and left :-), MP Heat is dead though, but then again
> > it was sort of stillborn wasn't it ?

> As I've mentioned elsewhere, I play heat online with 40 other people on a
> weekly basis (not all at once, admittedly 10-12 in each race heats and
> final)
> It's the mods that make Heat worthwhile.  If N2K2 was moddable, even more
> would be playing it, I am sure.

> cheers
> John

Goy Larse

The "Future" is here?

by Goy Larse » Sun, 07 Jul 2002 17:43:48



> > Heat isn't dead, it's thriving as a matter of fact with new mods
> > popping up right and left :-), MP Heat is dead though, but then again
> > it was sort of stillborn wasn't it ?

> As I've mentioned elsewhere, I play heat online with 40 other people on a
> weekly basis (not all at once, admittedly 10-12 in each race heats and
> final)
> It's the mods that make Heat worthwhile.  If N2K2 was moddable, even more
> would be playing it, I am sure.

Ok, not dead, but certainly low key :-)

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy

"The Pits"    http://www.theuspits.com/

"A man is only as old as the woman he feels"
--Groucho Marx--

Goy Larse

The "Future" is here?

by Goy Larse » Sun, 07 Jul 2002 17:48:43


>   Well, I'll never be convinced otherwise anyway, but who cares :)   I still
> believe GPL and it's fanbase would be dead without it's multi ability, and
> in terms of Heat, I meant the original stock car version, and it's dead as
> Enron stock.

I'm not actually disagreeing with you, just saying that I think GPL
would have had a large fan base even without MP due to the fact that it
takes a special interest to overcome the large step it was to go from
ICR2 or N2 to the physics model of GPL, and all this to be able to run
around in F1 cars from 1967 ?

And as for NHeat, I totally agree, who would want to run around in that
compared to N4 and NR2002, but I still think NHeat had a lot of promise
and I hope they come out with a 2nd effort

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy

"The Pits"    http://www.theuspits.com/

"A man is only as old as the woman he feels"
--Groucho Marx--

Steve Blankenshi

The "Future" is here?

by Steve Blankenshi » Sun, 07 Jul 2002 20:33:14

Ditto on hopes for a second shot from the guys at MGI.  Heat was a great
game IMHO, with only a few niggles and a lack of support from the publishers
(as opposed to the developers) that kept it from being more successful.  MGI
were a great help to the community in making Heat more mod-friendly with the
patches.  As for its MP, though it was more demanding of bandwidth than Papy
sims, if you had good connections you could bump and bang online with a
dozen or so cars just like offline.  Some of the most intense and enjoyable
online racing I've had was with Thomas Heineman's  DTM mod, leaning on each
other out of the turns & scraping fenders halfway down the straights at
converted tracks like Brno, Mugello  and Donington.  Looked like a bunch of
BTCC whacko's out there...  :-)

Cheers,

SB


> >   Well, I'll never be convinced otherwise anyway, but who cares :)   I
still
> > believe GPL and it's fanbase would be dead without it's multi ability,
and
> > in terms of Heat, I meant the original stock car version, and it's dead
as
> > Enron stock.

> I'm not actually disagreeing with you, just saying that I think GPL
> would have had a large fan base even without MP due to the fact that it
> takes a special interest to overcome the large step it was to go from
> ICR2 or N2 to the physics model of GPL, and all this to be able to run
> around in F1 cars from 1967 ?

> And as for NHeat, I totally agree, who would want to run around in that
> compared to N4 and NR2002, but I still think NHeat had a lot of promise
> and I hope they come out with a 2nd effort

> Beers and cheers
> (uncle) Goy

> "The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/

> "A man is only as old as the woman he feels"
> --Groucho Marx--

Dave Henri

The "Future" is here?

by Dave Henri » Sun, 07 Jul 2002 22:11:54


   Well the good news is the TPTCC league is still using the DTM mod but we
have gotten a beta of the DTM2 physics AND tweeked the damage model so you
don't get suspension damage so easily.  6 gears and slightly higher rev
limit.
Summer season is going strong.
dave henrie

David Powel

The "Future" is here?

by David Powel » Sun, 07 Jul 2002 22:58:04

the fact the game is so good has made it survive not VROC...VROC was only
made as its so good :)





> > >   Agreed Heat wasn't a bad effort, but how many play it now compared
to
> the
> > > Papy sims..................one has excellent multi.........one
doesn't.

> > As stated in other threads, MP isn't all that important to the majority
> > of sim buyers, if it was you'd see a whole lot more people doing pickup
> > racing on Sierra/Won/Whatever, we the enthusiasts may think it's
> > important, but there's not enough of us to make a difference, if we did
> > we'd have GPL2 by now

> > Beers and cheers
> > (uncle) Goy

> > http://www.theuspits.com

> > "A man is only as old as the woman he feels........"
> > --Groucho Marx--

>   I know, but fwiw, I've never subscribed to that argument.   Only games
> that keep getting played year after year are ones with quality multi.  GPL
> is a perfect example.  If it wasn't for VROC, it'd be long dead.
>   Or again, how come Heat is dead ?  Most likely, N2002 offline isn't that
> much better.

>   IMO of course<G>

> John


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.